Application of Hydroxyethyl Starch 200/0.5 Injection for Acute Ischemic Stroke and Evidencebased Medical Evaluation

GAO Bei,LIU Fang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2012.09.012
2012-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To investigate the application of hydroxyethyl NaCl injection(hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 injection for short) for acute ischemic stroke,and to perform an evidence-based medical evaluation so as to provide reference for rational use of hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 injection.METHODS: We collected the medical records of the patients with acute ischemic stroke in the department of nephrology of our hospital who were treated with hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 from June 2010 to October 2010.The indication,usage and dosage,medication time,course of treatment and safety of hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 were investigated,and the use of hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 injection was evaluated in accordance with drug package insert,treatment guidelines and clinical research evidence.RESULTS: A total of 86 cases were included.The treatment was in line with the related guidelines in 5.8%(5/86) cases in which hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 was used for cerebral watershed infarction.Evidence of class 2b level was noted in 5.8%(5/86) cases in which hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 was used for multiple-cerebral infarction,evidence of class 1a level in 55.8%(48/86) cases in which hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 was used for middle cerebral artery occlusion,and evidence of class 4 level in 2.3%(2/86) cases in which hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 was used for carotid artery occlusion.30.2%(26/86) used hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 in the absence of clinical research evidence-based indications.Hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 was used for an average of(13.66±5.81) days,and 65(75.6%) used hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 for a duration longer than 10 days as labeled in package inserts.The single dose for all cases was 500 mL at an infusion rate of 160-200 mL·h-1 that was faster than the infusion rate as described by the package inserts.CONCLUSION: In some acute ischemic stroke cases,the hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 was used in the absence of clinical research evidence and the usage and course of treatment were not in line with those labeled in package inserts.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?