Abstract:With the prevalence of low-carbon economic concepts and low-carbon lifestyles, government and enterprises around the world have taken measures to promote carbon abatement. The government encourages manufacturers to reduce carbon emissions by providing carbon abatement cost (CAC) subsidy, while also offering low-carbon consumption (LCC) subsidy to consumers to stimulate market demand and motivate manufacturers to furnish more low-carbon products. To figure out the effectiveness of each subsidy policy, this article constructs a dual-channel supply chain consisting of a single manufacturer and a single retailer. Among them, the manufacturer produces low-carbon products and sells them through both offline and online channels. The study considered four scenarios: no subsidy (the N model), only CAC subsidy (the C model), only LCC subsidy (the L model), and dual subsidy (the D model). The paper uses the Stackelberg game method to solve the equilibrium solutions of four models and compares subsidy policies from the perspectives of overall effectiveness and unit subsidy spending efficiency. The result shows that: (i) The carbon emission reductions, market demand, supply chain's profit, and consumer surplus of the dual subsidy policy are superior to those of the single subsidy policy, which in turn is superior to the no subsidy situation. In addition, under the same subsidy policy, the above indicators are better when the sales prices of offline and online channels are not consistent than when they are consistent. (ii) Compared to only CAC subsidy, the dual subsidy has lower efficiency in carbon emission reductions per unit subsidy, supply chain's profit per unit subsidy, and consumer surplus per unit subsidy. In addition, compared to only LCC subsidy, the dual subsidy results in more carbon emission reductions per unit subsidy, but supply chain's profit per unit subsidy and consumer surplus per unit subsidy show a phenomenon of first being higher and then lower. (iii) The unit subsidy spending efficiency of CAC subsidy decreases rapidly with the increase in the coefficient of CAC subsidy, while the unit subsidy spending efficiency of dual subsidy decreases rapidly with the increase in the coefficient of LCC subsidy. Finally, this study extracted management insights based on the above conclusions, providing reference for the government to formulate subsidy policies.

Dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with government consumption-subsidy.

Coordination Mechanism of Closed-loop Supply Chain under Government Intervention

Optimizing sustainability: a dual-channel supply chain model considering the carbon abatement cost subsidy and the low-carbon consumption subsidy

The government subsidy design considering the reference price effect in a green supply chain

The Impact of Different Government Subsidy Methods on Low-Carbon Emission Reduction Strategies in Dual-Channel Supply Chain

Optimal Government Subsidy Decision and Its Impact on Sustainable Development of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain

Decision-making in closed-loop supply chains: The interplay of dual government subsidies, channel Co-opetition, and brand premiums

Pricing policies of dual-channel green supply chain: Considering government subsidies and consumers' dual preferences

Research on low-carbon dual channel supply chain considering product substitution under government carbon tax and low-carbon subsidy

Impact of government subsidies on green supply chain operation under different power structures

Manufacturer vs. Retailer: A Comparative Analysis of Different Government Subsidy Strategies in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain Considering Green Quality and Channel Preferences

Impact of Government Subsidy Strategies on Supply Chains Considering Carbon Emission Reduction and Marketing Efforts

Carbon Reduction Subsidy, Remanufacturing Subsidy or Consumer Recycling Subsidy? A Low-Carbon Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Operation Decision

Optimal Pricing Strategy and Government Consumption Subsidy Policy in Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Third-Party Remanufacturer

Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models Considering Government Subsidy and Corporate Social Responsibility Investment

Accounts Receivable Financing and Supply Chain Coordination under the Government Subsidy

Firm Decisions and Government Subsidies in a Supply Chain with Consumer Surplus Consideration

Decision making and benefit analysis of closed-loop remanufacturing supply chain considering government subsidies

The Effects of a Government’s Subsidy Program: Accessibility Beyond Affordability

Dynamic Game of the Dual-Channel Supply Chain Under a Carbon Subsidy Policy

Effects of double subsidies and consumers' acceptability of remanufactured products on a closed-loop supply chain with trade-in programs