Abstract:Context: Gradually-typed languages allow typed and untyped code to interoperate, but typically come with significant drawbacks. In some languages, the types are unreliable; in others, communication across type boundaries can be extremely expensive; and still others allow only limited forms of interoperability. The research community is actively seeking a sound, fast, and expressive approach to gradual typing. Inquiry: This paper describes Static Python, a language developed by engineers at Instagram that has proven itself sound, fast, and reasonably expressive in production. Static Python's approach to gradual types is essentially a programmer-tunable combination of the concrete and transient approaches from the literature. Concrete types provide full soundness and low performance overhead, but impose nonlocal constraints. Transient types are sound in a shallow sense and easier to use; they help to bridge the gap between untyped code and typed concrete code. Approach: We evaluate the language in its current state and develop a model that captures the essence of its approach to gradual types. We draw upon personal communication, bug reports, and the Static Python regression test suite to develop this model. Knowledge: Our main finding is that the gradual soundness that arises from a mix of concrete and transient types is an effective way to lower the maintenance cost of the concrete approach. We also find that method-based JIT technology can eliminate the costs of the transient approach. On a more technical level, this paper describes two contributions: a model of Static Python and a performance evaluation of Static Python. The process of formalization found several errors in the implementation, including fatal errors. Grounding: Our model of Static Python is implemented in PLT Redex and tested using property-based soundness tests and 265 tests from the Static Python regression suite. This paper includes a small core of the model to convey the main ideas of the Static Python approach and its soundness. Our performance claims are based on production experience in the Instagram web server. Migrations to Static Python in the server have caused a 3.7\% increase in requests handled per second at maximum CPU load. Importance: Static Python is the first sound gradual language whose piece-meal application to a realistic codebase has consistently improved performance. Other language designers may wish to replicate its approach, especially those who currently maintain unsound gradual languages and are seeking a path to soundness.

TPython:An Extension of Python

Static Type Analysis for Python

Dr Wenowdis: Specializing dynamic language C extensions using type information

What Types Are Needed for Typing Dynamic Objects? A Python-Based Empirical Study.

An Empirical Study of Dynamic Types for Python Projects.

Efficiently and easily integrating differential equations with JiTCODE, JiTCDDE, and JiTCSDE

An Empirical Study on Dynamic Typing Related Practices in Python Systems

An Empirical Study on the Impact of Python Dynamic Typing on the Project Maintenance

PoTo: A Hybrid Andersen's Points-to Analysis for Python

A Constraint Based Bug Checking Approach for Python

tym: Typed Matlab

Path-sensitive Type Analysis with Backward Analysis for Quality Assurance of Dynamic Typed Language Code

How Well Static Type Checkers Work with Gradual Typing? A Case Study on Python.

Optimizing and Evaluating Transient Gradual Typing

Dynamic Slicing of Python Programs

Static Type Recommendation for Python.

Tracking Down Dynamic Feature Code Changes Against Python Software Evolution

Gradual Soundness: Lessons from Static Python

Automated Return Type Annotation for Python

Recognizing Potential Runtime Types from Python Docstrings

Python meets JIT compilers: A simple implementation and a comparative evaluation