Abstract:Since China's reform and opening up,its infrastructure has been improved dramatically,creating the so-called infrastructure miracle.As we have already known that intra-region trade costs and inter-region trade cost,which are determined by the quality of infrastructure,have crucial effects on the spatial distribution of industries across regions within a country.Adopting the footloose capital model,we investigate the effects of trade cost differences due to infrastructure quality on regional industrial agglomeration,regional gap and social welfare.The main findings of the paper are listed as follows.(1) The residents of the less developed areas will benefit both from the improvement of the intra-region infrastructure of the less developed areas and/or of the inter-region infrastructure between the developed and the less developed ones.However,the mechanisms of the two policies are different.The policy of improving the infrastructure in the less developed areas has direct and indirect effects,both of which benefit the residents within it.The direct effect is more clearly visible in the rapid improvements in the infrastructure,while the indirect effect takes more time to be fully realized.This finding explains the common phenomenon of the low utilization of the infrastructure in the backward areas.The policy of improving inter-region infrastructure benefits the residents of the less developed areas through decreasing import cost.However,when the infrastructure in developed areas is better than that in less developed areas,this kind of policy will not only widen the regional gap as industries agglomerate around developed areas,but also widen regional income inequity.A new perspective for us to consider the relationship between industrial agglomeration and regional gap is that the industrial agglomeration caused by the infrastructure differences between developed areas and less developed ones may to some extent account for the widening income gap.(2) The residents of the less developed areas will benefit from the improvement of the infrastructure as industries spread to these areas,while the residents of the developed ones may enjoy fewer welfare benefits.There is high probability that this kind of policy may cut down the total social welfare benefits when both the industrial-size gap and the infrastructure gap between regions are significant.This finding has significant implications for the central government in making policies for regional coordination.If coordinated regional development is a long term target of the central government,early investment in the infrastructure in the less developed areas is vital.If the investment is delayed until considerable gap develops between regions,an overall efficiency loss may occur and the economic development in the earlier stages will be greatly hampered.(3) The main policy implication of this paper is that the optimal policy of the central government to improve the infrastructure depends on the initial levels of industrial sizes and infrastructure of the two regions.When the size difference between regional economies is small,when the trade barriers between regions are high,and when the less developed areas have significant investment cost advantage in improving the intra-region infrastructure,the central government should choose to invest in the infrastructure in less developed areas to maximize the total social welfare. One limitation of this study is that we only assume the public expenditure on infrastructure to be exogenous.In more general and realistic situations,local governments actually rely on tax revenue to finance infrastructure investments.One interesting extension would be to introduce tax policy into our model in order to better explain the strategic behaviors of local governments and their impact on industrial agglomeration and economic development.

Product’s Homogeneity,Local Protection of Investment and Measure of the Integration of Domestic Market

Infrastructure,Industrial Agglomeration and Regional Coordination

Home Bias, Border Effect and Internal Market Integration in China: Evidence from Inter‐provincial Value‐added Tax Statistics

China's Regional Trade and Domestic Market Integrations

Home Biases,Border Effects and Market Integration:An Empirical Study Based on Inter-provincial VAT Survey

An Empirical Study on the Integration of Trade and its Effects in the Global Economy

Gravity Model,Border Effect and Interregional Trade in China:Evidence from Regional Input-output Data

Border Trade and Regional Integration

China's Intra-product Trade: Status Quo Problems and Countermeasures

The impact of market integration on the quality of export products: A study based on manufacturing enterprises

The puzzle of quality upgrading of Chinese exports from the trade liberalization perspective

Integration of Trade and Disintegration of Production: An Empirical Study Based on Two Important Hypotheses of Economic Globalization

Trade relation between China and ASEAN countries: Competition or integration? — An empirical analysis based on export similarity, trade integration and regular market share model

Dispersion of Production in the Global Economy: an Empirical Study Based on Input-Output Tables of Jiangsu Province in China

Transportation Infrastructure and Regional Economic Integration In China

The Impact of High‐standard Free Trade Areas on the Diversifi cation of China's Export Products: Expanding Market or Intensifying Competition?

Inter-National and Intra-Country Economic Integration: the Case of China

How Much Does Regional Integration Contribute to Growth? an Analysis of the Impact of Domestic Market Integration on Regional Economic Performance in China (1997–2011)

Market integration and green economic growth-recent evidence of China's city-level data from 2004-2018

A PATH-DEPENDENT MODEL OF INVESTMENT AND EMPLOYMENT FLOW IN A LARGE ECONOMY IN A PROCESS OF INTEGRATION

Spatial effects of market integration on the industrial agglomeration of agricultural products: evidence from China