Stock trading and diversification discount

Qiao Liu,Rong Qi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2007.04.004

IF: 1.469

2008-01-01

Economics Letters

Abstract:While explicitly assuming that stock price conveys valuable information to the management, we show that the value loss from diversification is a function of the stock price informativeness. More informed stock trading leads to a more efficient investment and a smaller diversification discount.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Information Production, Analyst Following and Diversification Discount: A Market Microstructure Approach

Qiao Liu,Rong Qi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.279250

2001-01-01

Abstract:This paper offers an information-based explanation for the well-documented diversification discount. While explicitly assuming that the stock prices convey valuable information to the management, our model shows that the value loss from diversification is due to the insufficient information production. If more investors are willing to follow and actively trade a certain stock, more information will be transmitted to the managers and the corresponding value loss tends to decline. Thus, our model provides a rationale for the existence and cross-sectional variation in diversification discount. Using the analyst coverage as the proxy for information production, we find empirical evidence, which supports our model implications: holding firm characteristics fixed, the analyst converge explains a significant portion of the cross-sectional variation in diversification discount during the period 1985-1999.
The Role of Bad-News Coverage and Media Environments in Crash Risk Around the World

Qigui Liu,Jinghua Tang,Donghui Li,Lu Xing

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2023.04.007

IF: 3.025

2023-01-01

Journal of Empirical Finance

Abstract:Employing a large international sample across 34 countries, we find that media coverage of bad news reduces firms' future stock price crash risk. This effect is strengthened when the country-level trust in news media and press freedom is high. Bad-news coverage not only conveys price-sensitive information that directly alleviates managers' bad-news hoarding, but also disciplines managers' opportunistic activities, such as earnings management and risk-taking, which in turn impedes the hoarding of bad news. Furthermore, the negative effect of bad-news coverage on future crash risk intensifies during the global financial crisis and weakens following the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards.
Trade Credit Financing and Stock Price Crash Risk

Feng Cao,Kangtao Ye,Ning Zhang,Sifei Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12067

2018-01-01

Abstract:This study investigates the association between trade credit financing and stock price crash risk within China's context. We find that firms using more trade credit financing have significantly lower future stock price crash risk. This negative association is more pronounced for firms with greater information asymmetry and for firms located in less developed financial markets. This finding is robust to the endogeneity concern, alternative measures of stock price crash risk, and the inclusion of other factors identified in prior studies that might affect stock price crash risk. Further evidence suggests that both the monitoring mechanism and the disclosure mechanism drive the documented relation. Our study suggests that access to trade credit can significantly reduce the likelihood of crash risk in a country like China with less developed formal bank financing. Our study also suggests that investors can effectively avoid stock price crash risk by using the trade credit information disclosed in financial statements.
The H-A Price Discount and Its Determinants

QU Baozhi,REN Lixing,WU Xiaoyu,CHEN Ling

2010-01-01

Abstract:Using a newly constructed data set that covers 59 cross-listed Chinese companies,we find that the H-A price differentials are significantly reduced by the increasing investments under the Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors(QFⅡ) and the Qualified Domestic Institutional Investors(QDⅡ) schemes after controlling for the expected exchange rate change,investor sentiment and other variables.The evidence suggests that the gradual lift of China's capital controls exert crucial impacts on the valuation of these two classes of shares.
Managerial overconfidence, diversification, and firm risk

Fuxiu Jiang,Min Zhang,Zhibiao Liu

2008-01-01

Abstract:Although prior literature argues that diversification leads to firm value discount, few studies examine the relation between diversification and firm risk. Using the data from Chinese stock markets during 2002-2005, we find that diversification significantly reduces firm risk. However, such a risk-reduction effect is weakened when managers are over-confident. Our findings lend a support to firm diversification even there exists diversification discount.
Specialization in Investor Information and the Diversification Discount

Ronaldo Carpio,Meixin Guo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3221595

2018-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:We present a theory of the diversification discount based on investor specialization in information; this is modeled by different investors having a lower belief variance for different assets. We show that a discount exists in a general multi-asset, multi-investor setting; the discount increases with the degree of information specialization among investors. We empirically test our model using corporate spinoffs from the USA, using a novel measure of industry similarity based on sell-side analyst behavior. We find that higher abnormal returns on the spinoff announcement date are associated with higher industry dissimilarity between parent and child firms.
Preliminary Version Information , Diversification , and Cost of Capital ∗ †

Jack Hughes,Jing Liu,Jun Liu

2004-01-01

Abstract:Information, Diversification, and Cost of Capital We study the pricing implications of information in a noisy rational expectations model with a factor structure for multi-asset payoffs. There are two classes of price taking investors in our model; informed investors who receive private signals on asset payoffs, and uninformed investors who draw imperfect inferences about those signals from prices. We solve the equilibrium explicitly. We show that only information about systematic factors matters in determining asset risk premiums when the number of the risky assets is large. Idiosyncratic risk as well as the asymmetric information risk associated with idiosyncratic factors is fully diversifiable.
Study on Diversification Discount in M & A Based on Chinese Stock Market

Zhong-wei HAN,Hua-long CHEN,Chao-jun YANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1006-2467.2007.12.025

2007-01-01

Shanghai Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University

Abstract:This article examined the change in the excess value of 52 China's listed companies making acquisitions in 2002. It was found that much of the excess value reduction occurs possibly because sample firms acquire already discounted units, but there is no evidence that diversification destroys value. This implies that diversification's negative effect on the firm value may be exaggerated by traditional firm theories.
The Relation Between Diversification and Cost of Capital:Evidence from Chinese Stock Market

Jiang Fuxiu,Lu Zhengfei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2006.06.008

2006-01-01

Abstract:According to the theory of Options Pricing Model,the beneficiary of firm's reduced risk caused by diversification is creditor,rather than shareholder,and this makes shareholders' wealth decreased,so diversification might not be aeeeptod by shareholder,and the cost of equity of diversified firms might be higher than specified firms.Meanwhile,the internal capital market could realloeate resources among different opera- tion units in a firm,and then reduce the degree of firm's dependent on outside capital market where the cost of capital is comparatively high, accordingly,the WACC of diversified firms might be lower than specified firms.This paper trys to test the relation between diversification and cost of equity as well as WACC,based on Chinese listed firms from 2001 to 2004.The result shows that there is a positive correlation between diversification and cost of equity,but a negative relation between diversification and WACC.
Investment Opportunities, Liquidity Premium, and Conglomerate Mergers

C Chang,XY Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.167630

2004-01-01

Abstract:In this article we show that in a finitely liquid market with asymmetrically informed investors, both the benefits and the costs of diversification vary with the return and risk of the investment opportunities of the firm's divisions. The benefits come from a reduced liquidity discount in the stock price of the merged firm when its shareholders anticipate less informed trading. The costs are the result of less efficient investment by the merged firm's divisions due to a less informative stock price. Our results provide explanations for the life cycle of diversification strategies and implications for evaluating merger and spin-off candidates.
Information-Based Stock Trading, Executive Incentives, and the Principal-Agent Problem

Qiang Kang,Qiao Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1128

IF: 5.4

2010-01-01

Management Science

Abstract:We examine the role of information-based stock trading in affecting the risk--incentive relation. By incorporating an endogenous informed trading into an optimal incentive contracting model, we analytically show that, apart from reducing incentives, a greater risk increases the level of information-based trading, which consequently enhances executive incentives and offsets the negative risk--incentive relation. We calibrate the model and find that the economic magnitude of this incentive-enhancement effect is significant. Our empirical test using real-world executive compensation data lends strong support to the model prediction. Our results suggest that principals (boards of directors) should consider underlying stock trading characteristics when structuring executive incentives.
Diversification in lottery-like features and portfolio pricing discount: Evidence from closed-end funds

Xin Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2021.02.001

IF: 3.025

2021-06-01

Journal of Empirical Finance

Abstract:<p>Why do portfolios often trade at discounts relative to the sum of their components? I provide a new explanation based on the diversification in lottery-like features. I argue that portfolios trade at discounts when their components exhibit a strong lottery-like feature but a low tendency of producing extreme payoffs together. This discount can be partially mitigated if lottery-like components tend to produce extreme payoffs at the same time. I use the closed-end fund setting to provide empirical supports for this explanation. My findings support prospect theory from an alternative perspective and provide a novel explanation for the closed-end fund puzzle.</p>

economics,business, finance
Trading Frequency and Information Efficiency: Theory and Evidence from US and Chinese Markets

Feng Gao,Zoran Ivkovich,Sophia Zhengzi Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2517801

2014-01-01

Abstract:This paper analyzes the relation between price informativeness and trading frequency. We develop a sequential trading model to capture the tradeoff between trading more frequently and acquiring more information. The key component of the model is the cost of information collection and processing. When information flow comes sequentially, traders must give up some early trading opportunities if they want to acquire more information. We show that more trading opportunities may induce informed traders to participate in more trades before obtaining more accurate information. Consequently, when informed traders trade more frequently, less information is impounded into prices. Empirical tests using stocks listed on NYSE, as well as the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, support the two testable implications of our model — a negative relation between the quality of the information environment and informed traders’ trading frequency, and a negative relation between informed traders’ trading frequency and price informativeness. One implication of our model and empirical results is that a decrease in excessive trading activities may help shift market participants’ attention from short-term price movements to companies’ fundamental information so that the information could be more efficiently impounded into prices, which, in turn, may further lead toward better resource allocation in financial markets.
Correlation Ambiguity and Under-Diversification

Jun Liu,Xudong Zeng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2692692

2017-01-01

Abstract:We study effects of correlation ambiguity on portfolio choice when the number of risky assets is large. We find that the optimal portfolio contains only a fraction of available risky assets. With 100 stocks randomly selected from the S&P 500, less than 20 stocks will be held in the optimal portfolio. Thus, correlation ambiguity provides an explanation for under-diversification documented in empirical studies. In particular, correlation ambiguity can generate anti-diversification in the sense that the optimal portfolio consists of only one risky asset. Even though the optimal portfolio under correlation ambiguity is less diversified, it is less risky in the sense that it has smaller variance and fewer extremely large positions than the standard mean-variance portfolio. Our results suggest that correlation ambiguity has important implications for portfolio choice.
CEO Compensation, Diversification and Incentives

Li Jin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.254260

2001-01-01

Abstract:This paper studies how firms tie CEO compensation to firms' stock market performance. I demonstrate that in theory and in practice there is a tradeoff between giving CEOs incentives and forcing them to hold an un-diversified position in the firm. Unlike the results of the existing literature, market risk is not necessarily a cost of providing incentives. The cost of giving incentives is the potential loss of diversification for the CEO. As a result, CEO incentive decreases with firm-specific risk, but may not decrease with market risk. This paper also incorporates the recent critique by Prendergast (2000), which argues that the relation between risk and incentive level is unreliably estimated when we fail to consider the effect of risk on the benefit of giving incentives. I study both sides of the incentive-diversification tradeoff simultaneously. I am able to show that after controlling for the other side of the tradeoff, higher incentive is observed when CEOs' efforts have higher productivity, or when firm has lower firm-specific risk level.
Diversification and Correlation Ambiguity

Jun Liu,Xudong Zeng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2692692

2015-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:One of the most important insights of modern finance is the diversification of the optimal portfolio that usually contains all available risky assets. In this paper, we show that correlation ambiguity can generate anti-diversification in the sense that the optimal portfolio has exactly one risky asset even though there are N > 1 available risky assets. Generally, correlation ambiguity leads to under-diversification in the sense that the optimal portfolio contains only a portion of the available risky assets. With 100 stocks randomly selected from S&P 500, on average, approximately 20 stocks will be held in the optimal portfolio when the sets of ambiguous correlations are given by 95% confidence intervals. Our results suggest that aversion to correlation ambiguity may provide an explanation for the under-diversification documented in empirical studies. JEL classification: G11 We thank seminar participants at Shanghai Advanced Institute of Finance (SAIF) and Southwestern University of Finance and Economics for helpful comments. Address correspondence to Jun Liu, Rady School of Management, University of California at San Diego, Otterson Hall, 4S148, 9500 Gilman Dr, #0553, La Jolla, CA 92093-0553; E-mail: junliu@ucsd.edu. Xudong Zeng is affiliated to School of Finance, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics; E-mail: zeng.xudong@mail.shufe.edu.cn
Diversification and heterogeneity of investor beliefs

Jie Jiao,Bin Qiu,An Yan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.028

IF: 3.539

2013-01-01

Journal of Banking & Finance

Abstract:•Our study is based on both the firm sample and the merger sample.•Diversification reduces the heterogeneity of investor beliefs.•Diversified firms’ lower heterogeneity of beliefs affects their excess values.•Diversification affects firm value by affecting investors’ belief heterogeneity.
The Adverse Selection about the Diversification of Committed Investment Projects of Chinese Listed Companies

LI Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-9952.2005.04.003

2005-01-01

Abstract:By descriptive statistics and multivariate linear regression on the database of 162 listed companies, the paper draws a conclusion that diversification is positively correlated with the changes of committed investment projects, and negatively with the performances after IPO of listed companies, which indicates that the “simplification preference” of the market to committed investment projects is reasonable. Furthermore, committed investment projects of listed companies have an abnormal “simplification tendency” because of adverse selection. The game between the market and listed companies on information disclosure may result in a bad Nash Equilibrium. Therefore, an idea of moderate regulation is advised because excessive restriction will increase the probability of adverse selection.
Can enhanced stock price informativeness improve the investment efficiency of Chinese listed companies?

Zhizhu Yuan,Xiaofeng Jü,NaiKun Hou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/WiCom.2008.2376

2008-01-01

Abstract:Although stock price informativeness has been posited to improve investment efficiency, there has been little empirical evidence supporting this claim to date. By the use of Chinese listed companies from 2002 to 2006 as the research sample, the effect of stock price informativeness on investment efficiency was empirically studied based on corporate level for the first time. The empirical results indicate: stock price informativeness is strongly negatively associated with both firm overinvestment and underinvestment. Further, stock price informativeness also can notably decrease the sensitivity of overinvestment to free cash flow and the sensitivity of underinvestment to financing constraints. It finally eliminates the possibility that the negative correlation is caused by the case that managers decrease stock price informativeness to conceal the investment losses. © 2008 IEEE.
An Empirical Study on Diversification and Finn Performance

Zhang Yi,Liu Wei,Gong Liutang

2005-01-01

Abstract:This paper investigates the impact of diversification on the performance of 1032 firms listed in China. We show that the return on assets (ROA) and firm diversification are negatively related. The finding is consistent with the hypothesis that diversification results in significant costs for firms. However we find Tobin's Q and firm performance are positively related. This finding is inconsistent with the study in developed countries due to the incomplete transition market in China. We also find diversification does not reduce the risk of the firm to be financially distressed (ST, FT or delisted). Our findings suggest that overall the diversification strategy is not beneficial for listed firms in China.

Stock trading and diversification discount

Information Production, Analyst Following and Diversification Discount: A Market Microstructure Approach

The Role of Bad-News Coverage and Media Environments in Crash Risk Around the World

Trade Credit Financing and Stock Price Crash Risk

The H-A Price Discount and Its Determinants

Managerial overconfidence, diversification, and firm risk

Specialization in Investor Information and the Diversification Discount

Preliminary Version Information , Diversification , and Cost of Capital ∗ †

Study on Diversification Discount in M & A Based on Chinese Stock Market

The Relation Between Diversification and Cost of Capital:Evidence from Chinese Stock Market

Investment Opportunities, Liquidity Premium, and Conglomerate Mergers

Information-Based Stock Trading, Executive Incentives, and the Principal-Agent Problem

Diversification in lottery-like features and portfolio pricing discount: Evidence from closed-end funds

Trading Frequency and Information Efficiency: Theory and Evidence from US and Chinese Markets

Correlation Ambiguity and Under-Diversification

CEO Compensation, Diversification and Incentives

Diversification and Correlation Ambiguity

Diversification and heterogeneity of investor beliefs

The Adverse Selection about the Diversification of Committed Investment Projects of Chinese Listed Companies

Can enhanced stock price informativeness improve the investment efficiency of Chinese listed companies?

An Empirical Study on Diversification and Finn Performance