Several Questions on Using Formality

ZHAO Qian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2007.05.060

2007-01-01

Abstract:Equivalency verification and the application of Formality are introduced which is a famous equivalency verification tool used in ASIC design flow. The problem of simulation/synthesis mismatches is discussed which are found during the equivalency verification, then is given the solution.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Combinational Equivalence Checking Based on Circuit Topology Analysis

Guanghui Li,Dongqin Feng,Songwei Zeng

2008-01-01

Abstract:With the increasing of VLSI circuit size, using multiple verification engines has been an important methodology of formal equivalence checking for combinational circuits. A combinational equivalence checking method based on circuit topology analysis is presented. This method can correlate the circuit topology to the complexity of verification algorithm, thus decide the optimal verification engine beforehand and improve the efficiency of equivalence checking. The experimental results on ISCAS'85 benchmark circuits show the efficiency and the feasibility of the proposed method.
A Formal Verification Methodology for Checking Data Integrity

Yasushi Umezawa,Takeshi Shimizu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0710.4848

2007-10-25

Logic in Computer Science

Abstract:Formal verification techniques have been playing an important role in pre-silicon validation processes. One of the most important points considered in performing formal verification is to define good verification scopes; we should define clearly what to be verified formally upon designs under tests. We considered the following three practical requirements when we defined the scope of formal verification. They are (a) hard to verify (b) small to handle, and (c) easy to understand. Our novel approach is to break down generic properties for system into stereotype properties in block level and to define requirements for Verifiable RTL. Consequently, each designer instead of verification experts can describe properties of the design easily, and formal model checking can be applied systematically and thoroughly to all the leaf modules. During the development of a component chip for server platforms, we focused on RAS (Reliability, Availability, and Serviceability) features and described more than 2000 properties in PSL. As a result of the formal verification, we found several critical logic bugs in a short time with limited resources, and successfully verified all of them. This paper presents a study of the functional verification methodology.
A Method Of Formal Verification For Logic Circuits With "Don'T Care" Information

Zm Wang,Jn Bian,Hx Xue

1999-01-01

Abstract:In the logic synthesis phase, "don't care" information is used to optimize logic circuits. Different usage of "don't care" information may cause the synthesis results to be different, although ail of the circuits satisfy the design requirement. When two of the circuits are verified their equivalency, the above fact might cause the verification result inconsistent. Fn this paper, a method for verifying the circuit equivalency with "don't care" information is presented. Using the method, the system can exclude the improper verification results caused by different use of "don't care" information. It uses OBDD to represent "don't care" vectors of circuits.
Analogous Alignments: Digital "Formally" meets Analog

Hansa Mohanty,Deepak Narayan Gadde

2024-09-23

Abstract:The complexity of modern-day System-on-Chips (SoCs) is continually increasing, and it becomes increasingly challenging to deliver dependable and credible chips in a short time-to-market. Especially, in the case of test chips, where the aim is to study the feasibility of the design, time is a crucial factor. Pre-silicon functional verification is one of the main contributors that makes up a large portion of the product development cycle. Verification engineers often loosely verify test chips that turn out to be non-functional on the silicon, ultimately resulting in expensive re-spins. To left-shift the verification efforts, formal verification is a powerful methodology that aims to exhaustively verify designs, giving better confidence in the overall quality. This paper focuses on the pragmatic formal verification of a mixed signal Intellectual Property (IP) that has a combination of digital and analog blocks. This paper discusses a novel approach of including the analog behavioral model into the formal verification setup. Digital and Analog Mixed-Signal (AMS) designs, which are fundamentally different in nature, are integrated seamlessly in a formal verification setup, a concept that can be referred to as "Analogous Alignments". Our formal setup leverages powerful formal techniques such as FPV, CSR verification, and connectivity checks. The properties used for FPV are auto-generated using a metamodeling framework. The paper also discusses the challenges faced especially related to state-space explosion, non-compatibility of formal with AMS models, and techniques to mitigate them such as k-induction. With this verification approach, we were able to exhaustively verify the design within a reasonable time and with sufficient coverage. We also reported several bugs at an early stage, making the complete design verification process iterative and effective.

Artificial Intelligence,Hardware Architecture
Verifying Non-friendly Formal Verification Designs: Can We Start Earlier?

Bryan Olmos,Daniel Gerl,Aman Kumar,Djones Lettnin

2024-10-24

Abstract:The design of Systems on Chips (SoCs) is becoming more and more complex due to technological advancements. Missed bugs can cause drastic failures in safety-critical environments leading to the endangerment of lives. To overcome these drastic failures, formal property verification (FPV) has been applied in the industry. However, there exist multiple hardware designs where the results of FPV are not conclusive even for long runtimes of model-checking tools. For this reason, the use of High-level Equivalence Checking (HLEC) tools has been proposed in the last few years. However, the procedure for how to use it inside an industrial toolchain has not been defined. For this reason, we proposed an automated methodology based on metamodeling techniques which consist of two main steps. First, an untimed algorithmic description written in C++ is verified in an early stage using generated assertions; the advantage of this step is that the assertions at the software level run in seconds and we can start our analysis with conclusive results about our algorithm before starting to write the RTL (Register Transfer Level) design. Second, this algorithmic description is verified against its sequential design using HLEC and the respective metamodel parameters. The results show that the presented methodology can find bugs early related to the algorithmic description and prepare the setup for the HLEC verification. This helps to reduce the verification efforts to set up the tool and write the properties manually which is always error-prone. The proposed framework can help teams working on datapaths to verify and make decisions in an early stage of the verification flow.

Hardware Architecture,Artificial Intelligence
Functional verification of complete sequential behaviors: A formal treatment of discrepancies between system-level and RTL descriptions

Carlos Ivan Castro Marquez,M. Strum,J. Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IDT.2013.6727074

2013-12-01

Abstract:Formal techniques allow exhaustive verification on circuit design (at least in theory), but due to actual computational limitations, workarounds must always be adopted to check only a portion of the design at a time. Sequential equivalence checking is an effective approach, but it can only be applied between circuit descriptions where a one-to-one correspondence for states, as well as for memory elements, is expected. This paper presents a formal methodology to verify RTL descriptions through direct comparison with high-level reference models. By doing so, there is no need to specify or analyze formal properties, as the complete behavior is already contained in the reference model. We also consider the natural discrepancies between system level and RTL code, including non-matching interface and memory elements, and state mapping. In this manner, we are able to prove the functional coherence for the overall sequential behavior of the design under verification.

Engineering,Computer Science
Verification Framework for UML-Based Design of Embedded Systems.

Martin Kardos,Yuhong Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8149-9_3

2004-01-01

Abstract:System level design incorporating system modeling and formal specification in combination with formal verification can substantially contribute to the correctness and quality of the embedded systems and consequently help reduce the development costs. Ensuring the correctness of the designed system is, of course, a crucial design criterion especially when complex distributed (realtime) embedded systems are considered. Therefore, this paper aims at presenting a verification framework designated for formal verification and validation of UML-based design of embedded systems. It first introduces an approach of using the AsmL language for acquiring formal models of the UML semantics and consequently presents an on-the-fly model checking technique designed to run the formal verification directly over those semantic models.
Equivalence Checking a Floating-point Unit against a High-level C Model (Extended Version)

Rajdeep Mukherjee,Saurabh Joshi,Andreas Griesmayer,Daniel Kroening,Tom Melham

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1609.00169

2016-09-01

Abstract:Semiconductor companies have increasingly adopted a methodology that starts with a system-level design specification in C/C++/SystemC. This model is extensively simulated to ensure correct functionality and performance. Later, a Register Transfer Level (RTL) implementation is created in Verilog, either manually by a designer or automatically by a high-level synthesis tool. It is essential to check that the C and Verilog programs are consistent. In this paper, we present a two-step approach, embodied in two equivalence checking tools, VERIFOX and HW-CBMC, to validate designs at the software and RTL levels, respectively. VERIFOX is used for equivalence checking of an untimed software model in C against a high-level reference model in C. HW-CBMC verifies the equivalence of a Verilog RTL implementation against an untimed software model in C. To evaluate our tools, we applied them to a commercial floating-point arithmetic unit (FPU) from ARM and an open-source dual-path floating-point adder.

Software Engineering,Logic in Computer Science
A formal verification method: model checking

YANG Jun,GE Hai-tong,ZHENG Fei-jun,YAN Xiao-lang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1008-9497.2006.04.012

2006-01-01

Abstract:Being a formal verification method,model checking is used frequently in hardware and software design.Firstey the Kripke structure which is used to describe the behavior of a system and the CTL logic which is used to describe the property of a system were introduced.Then two model checking algorithms were introduced: one is the labeling algorithm,the other is the algorithm based on fixpoint.In the end,the symbolic model checking which can reduce the possibility of memory explosion was introduced.
Formal Verification of Hybrid Systems and Its Application on Chemical Process Control

张学军,谢剑英,张苗苗

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1001-0920.2001.02.017

2001-01-01

Abstract:Aiming at reliability of programmable logic controller forcontinuous plants, an approach is presented to make the hybrid systems′ formal verification. The model is given out by using hybrid rectangular automata and the analysis of its quotient transition system′s reachability is presented. The principles of verification are given. The method is illustrated by an example of chemical process control.
RTL2RTL Formal Equivalence: Boosting the Design Confidence

M V Achutha Kiran Kumar,Aarti Gupta,S S Bindumadhava

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.156.7

2014-07-15

Abstract:Increasing design complexity driven by feature and performance requirements and the Time to Market (TTM) constraints force a faster design and validation closure. This in turn enforces novel ways of identifying and debugging behavioral inconsistencies early in the design cycle. Addition of incremental features and timing fixes may alter the legacy design behavior and would inadvertently result in undesirable bugs. The most common method of verifying the correctness of the changed design is to run a dynamic regression test suite before and after the intended changes and compare the results, a method which is not exhaustive. Modern Formal Verification (FV) techniques involving new methods of proving Sequential Hardware Equivalence enabled a new set of solutions for the given problem, with complete coverage guarantee. Formal Equivalence can be applied for proving functional integrity after design changes resulting from a wide variety of reasons, ranging from simple pipeline optimizations to complex logic redistributions. We present here our experience of successfully applying the RTL to RTL (RTL2RTL) Formal Verification across a wide spectrum of problems on a Graphics design. The RTL2RTL FV enabled checking the design sanity in a very short time, thus enabling faster and safer design churn. The techniques presented in this paper are applicable to any complex hardware design.

Software Engineering,Hardware Architecture
Formal methods in software development: A road less travelled

John A van der Poll,John A Van der Poll

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18489/sacj.v45i0.33

2010-08-03

South African Computer Journal

Abstract:An integration of traditional verification techniques and formal specifications in software engineering is presented. Advocates of such techniques claim that mathematical formalisms allow them to produce quality, verifiably correct, or at least highly dependable software and that the testing and maintenance phases are shortened. Critics on the other hand maintain that software formalisms are hard to master, tedious to use and not well suited for the fast turnaround times demanded by industry. In this paper some popular formalisms and the advantages of using these during the early phases of the software development life cycle are presented. Employing the Floyd-Hoare verification principles during the formal specification phase facilitates reasoning about the properties of a specification. Some observations that may help to alleviate the formal-methods controversy are established and a number of formal methods successes is presented. Possible conditions for an increased acceptance of formalisms in oftware development are discussed.
From Statecharts to Verilog: a Formal Approach to Hardware/software Co-Specification

Shengchao Qin,Wei-Ngan Chin,Jifeng He,Zongyan Qiu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-005-0020-2

2006-01-01

Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering

Abstract:Hardware/software co-specification is a critical phase in co-design. Our co-specification process starts with a high level graphical description in Statecharts and ends with an equivalent parallel composition of hardware and software descriptions in Verilog. In this paper, we first investigate the Statecharts formalism by providing it a formal syntax and a compositional operational semantics. Based on that, a semantics-preserving linking function is designed to compile specifications written in Statecharts into Verilog. The obtained Verilog specifications are then passed to a partitioning process to generate hardware and software subspecifications, where the correctness is guaranteed by algebraic laws of Verilog.
A Semi-Formal Verification Methodology for Efficient Configuration Coverage of Highly Configurable Digital Designs

Aman Kumar,Sebastian Simon

2024-04-20

Abstract:Nowadays, a majority of System-on-Chips (SoCs) make use of Intellectual Property (IP) in order to shorten development cycles. When such IPs are developed, one of the main focuses lies in the high configurability of the design. This flexibility on the design side introduces the challenge of covering a huge state space of IP configurations on the verification side to ensure the functional correctness under every possible parameter setting. The vast number of possibilities does not allow a brute-force approach, and therefore, only a selected number of settings based on typical and extreme assumptions are usually verified. Especially in automotive applications, which need to follow the ISO 26262 functional safety standard, the requirement of covering all significant variants needs to be fulfilled in any case. State-of-the-Art existing verification techniques such as simulation-based verification and formal verification have challenges such as time-space explosion and state-space explosion respectively and therefore, lack behind in verifying highly configurable digital designs efficiently. This paper is focused on a semi-formal verification methodology for efficient configuration coverage of highly configurable digital designs. The methodology focuses on reduced runtime based on simulative and formal methods that allow high configuration coverage. The paper also presents the results when the developed methodology was applied on a highly configurable microprocessor IP and discusses the gained benefits.

Software Engineering,Artificial Intelligence,Hardware Architecture
Hierarchical Verification of AMS Systems With Affine Arithmetic Decision Diagrams

Carna Zivkovic,Christoph Grimm,Markus Olbrich,Oliver Scharf,Erich Barke

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tcad.2018.2864238

2019-10-01

Abstract:Formal methods are a promising alternative to simulation-based verification of mixed-signal systems. However, in practice, such methods fail to scale with heterogeneity and complexity of today’s analog/mixed-signal systems. Furthermore, it is unclear how they can be integrated into existing verification flows. This paper shows a path to overcome these obstacles. The idea is to use a hierarchical verification flow, in which components can be verified by formal methods or by multirun simulation. To transport verification results across hierarchies, we represent parameters and properties by affine arithmetic decision diagrams. We study to which extent this approach fulfills the needs of practical application by the verification of a phase-locked loop of an IEEE 802.15.4 transceiver system.

engineering, electrical & electronic,computer science, interdisciplinary applications, hardware & architecture
Designing Software with Complex Configurations

Alcino Cunha

2024-07-19

Abstract:In this paper I discuss how can lightweight formal methods be used to specify and verify software with complex configurations (for example, distributed protocols that work on specific network configurations). More specifically, I briefly present two popular formal methods - TLA+ and Alloy - and discuss the pros and cons of both in this particular context.

Software Engineering
Formal Verification for C Program

Junyan Qian,Baowen Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/informatica.2007.178

2007-01-01

Informatica

Abstract:Iterative abstraction refinement has emerged in the last few years as the leading approach to software model checking. We present an approach for automatically verifying C programs against safety specifications based on finite state machine. The approach eliminates unneeded variables using program slicing technique, and then automatically extracts an initial abstract model from C source code using predicate abstraction and theorem proving. In order to reduce time complexities, we partition the set of candidate predicates into subsets, and construct abstract model independently. On the basis of a counterexample-guided abstraction refinement scheme, the abstraction refines incrementally until the specification is either satisfied or refuted. Our methods can be extended to verifying concurrency C programs by parallel composition.
Functional Verification of High Performance Adders in COQ

Qian Wang,Xiaoyu Song,Ming Gu,Jiaguang Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/197252

2014-01-01

Journal of Applied Mathematics

Abstract:Addition arithmetic design plays a crucial role in high performance digital systems. The paper proposes a systematic method to formalize and verify adders in a formal proof assistant COQ. The proposed approach succeeds in formalizing the gate-level implementations and verifying the functional correctness of the most important adders of interest in industry, in a faithful, scalable, and modularized way. The methodology can be extended to other adder architectures as well.
Industrial Strength Formal Using Abstractions

Ashish Darbari,Iain Singleton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1606.02347

2017-04-30

Abstract:Verification of concurrent systems with thousands of multiple threads and transactions is a challenging problem not just for simulation or emulation but also for formal. To get designs to work correctly and provide optimal PPA the designers often use complex optimizations requiring sharing of multiple resources amongst active threads and transactions using FIFOs, stallers, pipelining, out-of-order scheduling, and complex layered arbitration. This is true of most non-trivial designs irrespective of a specific application domain such as CPU, GPU or communication. At the outset a lot of these application domains look diverse and complex; however at some level of detail all of these employ common design principles of sequencing, load balancing, arbitration and hazard prevention. We present in this paper a key abstraction based methodology for verifying ordering correctness and arbitration across a range of designs which are derived from different application domains. We show how by using abstractions and supporting them with invariants one can not only find deep corner case bugs in sequentially very deep designs; we can also build exhaustive proofs to prove the absence of critical bugs such as deadlock, starvation, and loss of data integrity. We present experimental results on a range of different designs and show that on some of the designs such as FIFOs we can verify over 100 different types of FIFOs for ordering correctness using a single assertion in a single testbench. We also show how the methodology of FIFO verification can be adapted to verify over half-a-dozen different types of arbiters including a very complex memory subsystem arbiter. We verify a multi-clocked synchronizer and a packet based design from a networking domain using the same abstraction as used in FIFO verification. The results demonstrate the strength of our methodology which is both reusable and compact.

Software Engineering,Logic in Computer Science
A Novel Collaborative Scheme of Simulation and Model Checking for System Properties Verification

M Zhu,JN Bian,WM Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2006.04.006

IF: 10

2006-01-01

Computers in Industry

Abstract:The conventional methods cannot easily handle the verification task of increasingly complex hardware designs. This research proposes a novel collaborative scheme for verifying functional properties of a design. The classified properties are designed for three verification engines, i.e. module simulation, BDD-based (Binary Decision Diagram) model checking and CDFG (Control Data Flow Graph) static analysis. The cooperative scheme is performed on a refined model from CDFG structure and three methods are employed to complete the properties verification interactively and collectively. For speeding up the verification process, optimization techniques are introduced, such as variables reordering, properties pre-grouping, and model refining. The benchmarks ITC'99 (International Test Conference) are used to demonstrate the validity and practicality of the collaborative scheme.

Several Questions on Using Formality

Combinational Equivalence Checking Based on Circuit Topology Analysis

A Formal Verification Methodology for Checking Data Integrity

A Method Of Formal Verification For Logic Circuits With "Don'T Care" Information

Analogous Alignments: Digital "Formally" meets Analog

Verifying Non-friendly Formal Verification Designs: Can We Start Earlier?

Functional verification of complete sequential behaviors: A formal treatment of discrepancies between system-level and RTL descriptions

Verification Framework for UML-Based Design of Embedded Systems.

Equivalence Checking a Floating-point Unit against a High-level C Model (Extended Version)

A formal verification method: model checking

Formal Verification of Hybrid Systems and Its Application on Chemical Process Control

RTL2RTL Formal Equivalence: Boosting the Design Confidence

Formal methods in software development: A road less travelled

From Statecharts to Verilog: a Formal Approach to Hardware/software Co-Specification

A Semi-Formal Verification Methodology for Efficient Configuration Coverage of Highly Configurable Digital Designs

Hierarchical Verification of AMS Systems With Affine Arithmetic Decision Diagrams

Designing Software with Complex Configurations

Formal Verification for C Program

Functional Verification of High Performance Adders in COQ

Industrial Strength Formal Using Abstractions

A Novel Collaborative Scheme of Simulation and Model Checking for System Properties Verification