Intravenous Low-Dose Erythromycin for the Prevention and Treatment of Feeding Intolerance in Preterm Infants:A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

张志群,李慧萍,朱建幸
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5501.2009.03.008
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficacy of intravenous low-dose erythromycin for the prevention and treatment of feeding intolerance in preterm infants.Methods The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, China Biological Medicine Database, VIP,WangFang and CMAC were searched up to the year of 2008. Handsearches and additional searches were also conducted. RCTs of erythromycin for feeding intolerance in preterm infants were included.Two reviewers independently extracted data from eligible studies and evaluated the quality of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed for the results of homogeneous studies by the Cochrane Collaboration′s software RevMan 5.0.17.Results 18 RCTs involving a total of 1200 premature infants were included.The meta-analysis showed: ①Primary outcomes:erythromycin prevention group(WMD= -4.18,95%CI:-6.29 to -2.08) and treatment group(WMD= -4.69,95%CI:-6.38 to -3.00) could achieve full enteral feeding earlier.However,there was no significant difference in the treatment group by sub-group analysis(WMD=-5.15,95%CI:-12.60 to 2.30) and between the treatment group and the control group by sensitivity analysis(WMD= -5.48,95%CI:-11.66 to 0.69).②Secondary outcomes:There was no significant difference in the duration of hospitalization(WMD=-1.10,95%CI:-3.65 to 1.37) and the incidence of NEC(OR=1.01,95%CI:0.24 to 4.22) between the erythromycin prevention group and the control group.In comparison of daily average weight gain(WMD=4.29,95%CI:-2.06 to 10.64) and the incidence of NEC(OR=0.68,95%CI:0.18 to 2.56),the meta-analysis showed no significant difference between the erythromycin treatment group and the control group; Some advantages were shown from erythromycin treatment group in resumption of birth weight(WMD=-2.45, 95%CI:-2.87 to -2.04), time of symptom disappeareing(WMD=-1.22, 95%CI:-1.33 to -1.11) and the duration of hospitalization(WMD=-9.70,95%CI:-11.92 to -7.49) compared with the control group.Conclusions There is no enough evidence to recommend the use of intravenous low-dose erythromycin for preterm infants ≤32 weeks′GA with or preterm infants at risk of feeding intolerance. Future research is needed to determine if there is a more precise dose range where erythromycin might be effective in shortening the time for parenteral nutrition and duration of hospitalization in preterm infants 32 weeks′GA. Erythromycin may have a role in improving the symptoms of feeding intolerance .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?