Comparison of Two Screening Tools for Osteoporosis

张浩,章振林,黄琪仁,胡伟伟,陆敬辉,胡云秋,李森,刘玉娟
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-7108.2009.06.001
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To estimate the relationship of the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians(OSTA) and a simple screening tool for low bone mass of Shanghai(STLBMS) with bone mineral density(BMD) and vertebral fracture in Shanghai postmenopausal women.We also compared the ability of these two screening tools to predict osteoporosis and vertebral fracture.Methods 988 postmenopausal women were included: 494 with vertebral fractures and the other 494 without.BMD at spine and proximal femur were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.OSTA and STLBMS indices were calculated.Results Both indices demonstrated that the fracture group had higher risk indices(P0.001).Both groups showed that higher risk indices with STLBMS index(P0.001).BMD at the L_1-4 and proximal femur showed positive correlation with OSTA and STLBMS index(r=0.336-0.562 and r=0.383-0.57,all P0.001).These two methods correlated more significantly(r=0.974,P0.001).The OSTA values of ≤-1 and STLBMS values of ≤5 could diagnose osteoporosis with an area under curve(AUC) of 0.73 and 0.74.They could predict postmenopausal vertebral fracture with an AUC of 0.55 and 0.57.Conclusions We concluded that OSTA and STLBMS positively correlated with BMD and might be helpful to identify postmenopausal women increased risk of vertebral fracture.Our data showed no difference between the ability of these two screening tools to predict osteoporosis and vertebral fracture.Both of them were ideal tools for screening osteoporosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?