Clinical Investigation of Familial Focal Segmental Glomerular Sclerosis

王朝晖,马骏,朱斌,潘晓霞,任红,张文,王伟铭,孙尉倩,朱杰,杨俪,陈楠
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-298x.2009.01.006
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To discuss the characteristics of familial patients with FSGS through pedigree investigation.Methodology:From January,2006 to December,2007,pedigree investigation was taken for all patients with non-secondary FSGS who admitted in our department of nephology.A total of ninteen patients were found with family history.The clinical screening examinations were taken for their family members,type IV collagen and α-galactosidae activity were also tested to exclude Alport syndrome and Fabry disease.The clinical characteristics of familial and sporadic FSGS patients were compared.Results:During the above period,totally 213 patients were non-secondary FSGS diagnosed by renal biopsy.Among them,19 patients had family history,ten men and nine women,accounting for 8.9% in all FSGS.The gender construction has no significant difference compared with sporadic cases(M :F=100 :94,P 0.05).The average level of 24-hours urine protein was(1.6±1.6)g in familial FSGS patients,compared with(1.8±1.7)g in sporadic FSGS patients,with no significant difference(P0.05).The average level of serum creatinine was(167.5±166.6) μmol/L in familial FSGS proband,while(198.4±190.6) μmol/L in sporadic FSGS patients,with no significant difference(P0.05).Among the 19 FSGS families,five had two members confirmed as FSGS by renal biopsy,seven families had one cases of renal biopsy confirmed FSGS and more than one cases with ESRF,others had one cases of renal biopsy confirmed FSGS and one or more relatives with proteinuria or unexplained renal insufficiency.Conclusion:Familial FSGS has a high incidence in all FSGS.With respect to clinical manifestations there was no significant difference between sporadic patients and familial ones,so it was easy for missed diagnosis.Careful pedigree investigation can significantly improve the diagnostic rate.Paying attention to familial FSGS screening will also contribute to the further study of genetic renal diseases.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?