Expression of CD137 in Tumor Cells of Hodgkin Lymphoma from Northern China and Its Application in Pathological Differential Diagnosis
Y F Shi,Z F Gao,C L Liu,X Huang,Y Q Song,C Zhang,D M Lin,L X Zhou,M Zhao,Y M Lai,M Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2016.06.009
2016-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To investigate the expression of CD137 in HRS cells of classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL), and its application in the pathological differential diagnosis. METHODS:54 cases of cHL with "HRS" cells, and 55 cases of non-cHL with "HRS-like" cells as control group were collected. "HRS" cells and "HRS-like" cells rich areas in slides were selected from relevant groups to produce two tissue microarrays. This study focused solely on "HRS" cells and "HRS-like" cells, immunohistochemical staining for antibodies including CD30, CD15, CD20, CD3, and PAX5 were performed on CHL cases, CD137 (clone BBK-2) immunostaining and EBER in situ hybridization were detected in both groups. RESULTS:All cHL cases aged 22.0-68.0 (median 45.5) years with the male to female ratio as about 1.7∶1 primarily involved lymph nodes; while in the control group, 54 cases aged 12.0-81.0 (median 50.0) years with male∶female=1.9∶1 primarily located in nodes with only 1 case in skin. In the cHL group, CD30, CD15, CD20 and CD3 were positive in 100.0%, 70.4%, 18.5% and 0 cases in order, and PAX5 showed weak to moderate positive in 70.4% cases; the positive rate of EBER was 25.9% in cHL group, and 21.8% in the control group; The CD137 positive rates were 57.4% in cHL and 14.5% in the control groups with a significant difference (P<0.001). There were no significant differences when CD137 expressions were further compared according to the differences in age [elder group (aged 60) /non elderly group], gender (male/female), EBV infection (yes/no), histological subtype and the expression of those major diagnostic markers (positive/negative) in either cHL or control groups (all P valued>0.05). The positive rates of CD137 expression in cHL were significantly different when sub-grouped according to accession year before or after 2013 (39.4% vs 85.7%, P=0.001); However, no difference was seen in the control group (12.5% vs 16.1% , P=0.705). For those cases after 2013, the CD137 positive ratio of cHL group was more significantly different with the control one (85.7% vs 16.1%, P<0.001). CONCLUSION:Frequent expression of CD137 in "HRS" cells of cHL cases from Northern China could be detected by IHC method, while the CD137 expression was much lower in "HRS-like" cells of the control group. The positive rate of CD137 expression by immunohistochemical staining significantly increased in this cohort stored less than 3 years, which might be more reliable. CD137 might be potentially applied on pathological differential diagnosis of cHL.