Abstract:Metanormative theory is, in part, about the meaning of sentences such as “One ought always act for reasons for which one could consistently allow everyone else to act as well,” and “One should proportion degree of belief solely in accordance with evidence.” There are other normative terms, of course, but ‘ought’ (≈ ‘should’), is clearly one of the handful of core normative terms, and I will focus on it here.1 Given this focus, here is a way to put an idea that I think many philosophers find attractive: ought-claims prescribe possible action, thought, and feeling, rather than describing how things actually stand in reality. Arguably, this idea underwrites the popularity of the is/ought divide, explains some of the attraction in Moore’s Open Question Argument, and motivates some of the interest philosophers have had in noncognitivist, emotivist, prescriptivist, projectivist, and expressivist accounts of normative thought and discourse. Here is another popular line of thought that has sometimes seemed to be in tension with that initial idea: A central part of the best overall account of the meaning of declarative sentences will explain how their truth conditions can be derived from the semantic values of their basic components and their logical form. The word ‘ought’ can, of course, figure in nondeclarative sentences, but the ought-sentences primarily at issue in metanormative theory are grammatically declarative. This implies that our overall theory of meaning should provide a compositional assignment of truth conditions to ought-sentences as a part of its treatment of declarative sentences more generally. This seems necessary for accounting for the fact that it is obviously meaningful to embed ought-sentences in propositional contexts, such as under the truth

On the jurisprudential meaning and realm of normative words:Reflection based on the transformation from new analytical jurisprudence to deontic logic

On Jurisprudence Leading to Judicial Path——the Realism Path of China's Jurisprudence

Deontic Meaning Making in Legislative Discourse

A Sociosemiotic Interpretation of Linguistic Modality in Legal Settings

Legal interpretation: Meaning as social construction

Development of Deontic Modality in Chinese Civil Laws

Revisiting Legal Terms: A Semiotic Perspective

Deontic Logic And Preference Change

Law As a Culturally Constituted Sign-System – A Space for Interpretation

Semiotics, language, and law: the linguistic turn in Western jurisprudence

Modals and Modality in Legal Discourse: A Corpus-Based Sociosemiotic Interpretation

A Pragmatic Turn In The Interpretation Of Court Judgments

Modals and Modality in Legal Discourse

Prioritized Norms in Formal Argumentation

On the justice as a high-level codes of ethics

Preamble of Applied Legal Philosophy: Its Attribute and Methods

On the Positive Analysis of the Justice

Metanormative theory and the meaning of deontic modals

Philosophy Of Law And The Development Of Law As A Normative Legal Science

Functions Of Chinese Modal Verbs In The Civil Legislation Of The People'S Republic Of China: A Sociosemiotic Perspective

The Role of Pragmatics in Legal Norm Representation