Abstract:Purpose: A large multicenter study has recently questioned the overall clinical efficacy of vena caval filters, especially when inserted prophylactically, because of the subsequent development of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) at the insertion site. We examined the incidence of this complication with newer, smaller diameter percutaneous devices. Methods: We reviewed our vascular surgery and interventional radiology clinical registries to identify patients in whom a femoral percutaneous vena caval filter had been placed from 1993 to 1998. This list was cross referenced with patients who had undergone lower extremity venous ultrasound scan examinations for the diagnosis of DVT in the vascular laboratory within a 60-day period before and after the insertion of the filter device. Results: A total of 35 patients during this 5-year period had timely follow-up venous duplex scan studies performed. The indications for filter placement were DVT in 16 patients (46%), pulmonary embolus in 13 patients (37%), DVT and pulmonary embolus in three patients (9%), and prophylactically in three patients (9%) at high risk for thromboembolization. Of the patients with documented thromboembolic events, 91% (29 of 32) had contraindications to anticoagulation therapy, and the remaining 9% (3 of 32) represented failure of anticoagulation therapy. A Greenfield filter was used in 13 patients (37%), a Simon Nitinol filter was used in 11 patients (31%), and a VenaTech filter was used in nine patients (26%). The other two patients (6%) had a Bird's Nest filter inserted. At a mean follow-up period of 12 +/- 2 days (median, 6 days), there was a 40% (14 of 35) incidence of proximal DVT in venous segments without evidence of thrombus before filter insertion. The majority (71%; 10 of 14) occurred in the common femoral vein, with three located in the superficial femoral vein and one in the external iliac vein. The lowest incidence of DVT was seen with the Greenfield and Bird's Nest filters as compared with the smaller Simon Nitinol and VenaTech filters (20% vs 55%; P < .05). The highest incidence of thrombosis occurred in patients with pre-insertion pulmonary emboli (50%; 8 of 16) as compared with those patients with DVT (38%; 6 of 16) and prophylactic insertion (0%; 0 of 3). However, the subgroups were too small to attain statistical significance. Conclusion: There is a continuing and significant incidence of new DVT development ipsilateral to the percutaneous femoral insertion site of vena caval filters. The smaller diameter filters are not associated with a lower incidence of femoral thrombosis.

Clinical application of Tempofilter Ⅱ temporary caval filter

The Usefulness of Inferior Vena Caval Temporal Filter Insertion Guided by Ultrasonogrphy

Permanent Inferior Vena Cava Filter in the Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis of Lower Limb: Mid-Term and Long-Term Outcome and the Clinical Significance

[Therapy of Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Inferior Vena Cava Thrombosis after Filter Implantation].

Application of inferior vena cava filter in patients with tumor thrombus secondary to malignant renal tumor

[Applications of the inferior vena cava filter for the prevention of the risk for pulmonary emboli]

Treatment for Thrombosis Secondary to the Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement

Temporary inferior vena cava filters factors associated with non-removal

Retrievable inferior vena cava filter to prevent pulmonary embolism in patients with fractures and deep venous thrombosis of lower extremities: a single-center experience

Therapeutic effect of inferior vena cava filter implantation on aged patients with deep venous thrombosis of lower limbs and multiple organ diseases

The application of retrievable vena cava filters in patients of bone fracture combined with deep venous thrombosis

Initial experience of color Doppler ultrasound-guided interior vena caval filter placement

Clinical analysis of endovascular treatment of filter-related inferior vena cava thrombosis

[A Single-Center Retrospective Study on the Intraluminal Implantation of Inferior Vena Cava Filter for the Lower Extremity Trauma Patients with Deep Venous Thrombosis].

Implantation of Inferior Vena Cava Filter in Preventing Pulmonary Embolism

Inferior Vena Cava Filter Long Term Complications and Retrieval Techniques: A Case Series and Literature Review

Clinical follow-up of patients with percutaneously inserted inferior vena caval filters

Deep venous thrombosis after percutaneous insertion of vena caval filters

Application of Inferior Vena Cava Filters in Prevention of Peri-Operative Pulmonary Embolism in Patients with Bone Fracture Combined with Deep Venous Thrombosis: a Report of 572 Cases

[Efficacy of Anticoagulation on Patency Post-Permanent Inferior Vena Caval Filter Placements].

Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Before Inferior Vena Cava Filter Recovery