Abstract:To introduce crown ethers into the struts of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), general approaches have been developed for the syntheses of dicarboxylic acid dibenzo[30]crown‐10 (DB30C10DA), dicarboxylic acid di‐2,3‐naphtho[30]crown‐10 (DN30C10DA), dicarboxylic acid bisparaphenylene[34]crown‐10 (BPP34C10DA), and dicarboxylic acid 1,5‐naphthoparaphenylene[36]crown‐10 (NPP36C10DA). These novel crown ethers not only retain the characteristics of their parent crown ethers since they can 1) bind cationic guests and 2) serve as templates for making mechanically interlocked molecules (MIMs), such as catenanes and rotaxanes, but they also present coordination sites to connect with secondary building units (SBUs) in MOFs. The binding behavior of BPP34C10DA with 1,1′‐dimethyl‐4,4′‐bipyridinium bis(hexafluorophosphate) (DMBP ⋅ 2 PF 6 ) has been investigated by means of UV/Vis, fluorescence, and NMR spectroscopic techniques. The crystal superstructure of the complex DMBP ⋅ 2 PF 6 ⊂ BPP34C10DA was determined by X‐ray crystallography. The NPP36C10DA‐based [2]catenane (H 2 NPP36C10DC‐CAT ⋅ 4 PF 6 ) and the BPP34C10DA‐based [2]catenane (H 2 BPP34C10DC‐CAT ⋅ 4 PF 6 ) were prepared in DMF at room temperature by the template‐directed clipping reactions of the planarly chiral NPP36C10DA and BPP34C10DA with 1,1′‐[1,4‐phenylenebis(methylene)]di‐4,4′‐bipyridin‐1‐ium bis(hexafluorophosphate) and 1,4‐bis(bromomethyl)benzene, respectively. The crystal structure of the dimethyl ester (BPP34C10DE‐CAT ⋅ 4 PF 6 ) of the [2]catenane H 2 BPP34C10DC‐CAT ⋅ 4 PF 6 was investigated by X‐ray crystallography, which revealed racemic R and S isomers with planar chirality present in the crystal in a 1:1 ratio. These crown ether based struts serve as excellent organic ligands to bind with transition metal ions in the construction of MOFs: the crown ethers BPP34C10DA and NPP36C10DA in the presence of Zn(NO 3 ) 2 ⋅ 4 H 2 O afforded the MOF‐1001 and MOF‐1002 frameworks, respectively. The crystal structures of MOF‐1001 and MOF‐1002 are both cubic and display Fm $\bar 3$ m symmetry. The unit cell parameter of the metal–organic frameworks is a =52.9345 Å. Since such MOFs, containing electron‐donating crown ethers are capable of docking incoming electron‐accepting substrates in a stereoelectronically controlled fashion, the present work opens a new access to the preparation and application of MOFs.

A catenated strut in a catenated metal-organic framework.

A Metal-Organic Framework Replete with Ordered Donor-Acceptor Catenanes.

Transient Catenation In A Zirconium-Based Metal-Organic Framework And Its Effect On Mechanical Stability And Sorption Properties

Ordered [2]catenanes in Covalent Organic Frameworks: from Molecules to Materials

Catenated covalent organic frameworks constructed from polyhedra

Innenrücktitelbild: Puffing Up Energetic Metal–Organic Frameworks to Large Carbon Networks with Hierarchical Porosity and Atomically Dispersed Metal Sites (angew. Chem. 7/2019)

Heterogeneity Within a Mesoporous Metal-Organic Framework with Three Distinct Metal-Containing Building Units.

Regulation of Catenation in Metal-Organic Frameworks with Tunable Clathrochelate-Based Building Blocks

Rigid‐Strut‐Containing Crown Ethers and [2]catenanes for Incorporation into Metal–Organic Frameworks

Face-Sharing Archimedean Solids Stacking For The Construction Of Mixed-Ligand Metal-Organic Frameworks

One Ligand, Two Roles: Novel Pillar-Layer Metal-Organic Frameworks Built with a 3D ligand and Asymmetric Inorganic Nodes

Interweaving of single-helical and equal double-helical chains with the same helical axis in a 3D metal–organic framework

A Solvent-Assisted Ligand Exchange Approach Enables Metal-Organic Frameworks with Diverse and Complex Architectures

Unprecedented Interweaving of Single-Helical and Unequal Double-Helical Chains into Chiral Metal-Organic Open Frameworks with Multiwalled Tubular Structures

Cross-catenation between position-isomeric metallacages

Metal-organic frameworks with designed chiral recognition sites.

Single‐Crystal to Single‐Crystal Cross‐Linking of an Interpenetrating Chiral Metal–Organic Framework and Implications in Asymmetric Catalysis

Step-by-step Route for the Synthesis of Metal-Organic Frameworks.

Preparation, Adsorption Properties, and Catalytic Activity of 3D Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks Composed of Cubic Building Blocks and Alkali‐Metal Ions

Highly Specific Coordination-Driven Self-Assembly of 2D Heterometallic Metal–Organic Frameworks with Unprecedented Johnson-type ( J 51 ) Nonanuclear Zr-Oxocarboxylate Clusters

Docking in Metal-Organic Frameworks