Abstract:Active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) can be summarized as follows: it inherits from proportional–integral–derivative (PID) the quality that makes it such a success: the error driven, rather than model-based, control law; it takes from modern control theory its best offering: the state observer; it embraces the power of nonlinear feedback and puts it to full use; it is a useful digital control technology developed out of an experimental platform rooted in computer simulations. ADRC is made possible only when control is taken as an experimental science, instead of a mathematical one. It is motivated by the ever increasing demands from industry that requires the control technology to move beyond PID, which has dominated the practice for over 80 years. Specifically, there are four areas of weakness in PID that we strive to address: 1) the error computation; 2) noise degradation in the derivative control; 3) oversimplification and the loss of performance in the control law in the form of a linear weighted sum; and 4) complications brought by the integral control. Correspondingly, we propose four distinct measures: 1) a simple differential equation as a transient trajectory generator; 2) a noise-tolerant tracking differentiator; 3) the nonlinear control laws; and 4) the concept and method of total disturbance estimation and rejection. Together, they form a new set of tools and a new way of control design. Times and again in experiments and on factory floors, ADRC proves to be a capable replacement of PID with unmistakable advantage in performance and practicality, providing solutions to pressing engineering problems of today. With the new outlook and possibilities that ADRC represents, we further believe that control engineering may very well break the hold of classical PID and enter a new era, an era that brings back the spirit of innovations.

On Convergence of Nonlinear Active Disturbance Rejection Control for SISO Nonlinear Systems

Asymptotic Stability of Active Disturbance Rejection Control for Linear SISO Plants with Low Observer Gains

Robust Compensation for Active Disturbance Rejection Control of a Class of High‐order Systems with Large Time Delay: Simulation and Experimental Studies

Development status of active disturbance rejection control

Event-Triggered Active Disturbance Rejection Control for Uncertain Random Nonlinear Systems

Active Disturbance Rejection Control Design for High-Order Integral Systems

Frequency-Domain Analysis of Nonlinear Active Disturbance Rejection Control Via the Describing Function Method.

A fast-response active disturbance rejection control for a class of nonlinear uncertain systems

Active Disturbance Rejection Control For A Nonlinear System Subject To Actuator Saturation

From PID to Active Disturbance Rejection Control

Simulation Study on Auto-disturbance rejection Control for Unstable Systems and Non-minimum Phase Systems

On the Stability of Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Control: Virtual Equivalent System Approach

Active disturbance rejection controller design for distributed parameter systems

Active Disturbance Rejection Control for a class of parallel systems

Lower-order linear active disturbance rejection control for electro-hydraulic servo system based on structural invariance compensation

Active Disturbance Rejection Control Design Based on Probabilistic Robustness for Uncertain Systems

Active Disturbance Rejection Control for Hydraulic Width Control System for Rough Mill

On Stability Analysis of Active Disturbance Rejection Disturbance Control for General MIMO Motion Control Systems

COORDINATED AUTO-DISTURBANCE-REJECTION CONTROL OF STATIC PHASE SHIFER AND EXCITATION SYSTEM

A Robust Control Methodology Based on Active Disturbance Rejection Control and Input Shaping

Active Disturbance Rejection Controller for High-Order System