A Dual Role of Erk Signaling in Embryonic Stem Cells
Xinwei Ma,Hạixia Chen,Lingyi Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exphem.2015.12.008
IF: 3.249
2016-01-01
Experimental Hematology
Abstract:•High levels of Erk signaling promote differentiation of embryonic stem cells.•A minimal level of Erk signaling is required for cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, suppression of cell death, and telomere length maintenance in embryonic stem cells.•An optimal level of Erk signaling should be maintained for the self-renewal of embryonic stem cells. Erk signaling plays a critical role in maintaining the pluripotency of mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Inhibition of Mek/Erk signaling by pharmacologic Mek inhibitor promotes self-renewal and pluripotency of mouse ESCs. However, knockout of Erk1/2 genes compromises the self-renewal and genomic stability of mouse ESCs. In this review, we summarize recent progress in understanding the role of Erk signaling in pluripotency maintenance, discuss the dual role of Erk in mouse ESCs, and provide explanations for the conflicting data regarding Mek inhibition and Erk knockout. Remaining questions and the prospects of Erk signaling in pluripotency maintenance are also discussed. Erk signaling plays a critical role in maintaining the pluripotency of mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Inhibition of Mek/Erk signaling by pharmacologic Mek inhibitor promotes self-renewal and pluripotency of mouse ESCs. However, knockout of Erk1/2 genes compromises the self-renewal and genomic stability of mouse ESCs. In this review, we summarize recent progress in understanding the role of Erk signaling in pluripotency maintenance, discuss the dual role of Erk in mouse ESCs, and provide explanations for the conflicting data regarding Mek inhibition and Erk knockout. Remaining questions and the prospects of Erk signaling in pluripotency maintenance are also discussed. Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) have two unique properties: the ability to self-renew indefinitely under proper conditions, and the potential to differentiate into all cell types in the body [1Martin G.R. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1981; 78: 7634-7638Crossref PubMed Scopus (4320) Google Scholar, 2Evans M. Kaufman M.H. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos.Nature. 1981; 292: 154-156Crossref PubMed Scopus (6469) Google Scholar]. Because of these two unique properties (also referred to as pluripotency), ESCs are promising donor cell sources for regenerative medicine. Hence, ESCs become a hot focus of the scientific and medical research. One fundamental question in the ESC field is how pluripotency is maintained in ESCs. Extensive studies have revealed that transcriptional regulation and epigenetic regulation play essential roles in pluripotency maintenance [3Jaenisch R. Young R. Stem cells, the molecular circuitry of pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming.Cell. 2008; 132: 567-582Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1117) Google Scholar, 4Young R.A. Control of the embryonic stem cell state.Cell. 2011; 144: 940-954Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (857) Google Scholar, 5Chen L. Zhang L. A balanced network: Transcriptional regulation in pluripotent stem cells.J Stem Cell Res Ther. 2012; : S10Google Scholar]. A transcriptional regulatory network for pluripotency, which is composed of a feed-forward self-regulating circuitry formed by Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog, and additional pluripotency-associated transcriptional factors, such as Klf4, Tbx3, and Esrrb, maintains the unique transcriptional profile of ESCs, by activating the expression of pluripotency-associated genes and suppressing the transcription of differentiation-related genes [3Jaenisch R. Young R. Stem cells, the molecular circuitry of pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming.Cell. 2008; 132: 567-582Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1117) Google Scholar, 4Young R.A. Control of the embryonic stem cell state.Cell. 2011; 144: 940-954Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (857) Google Scholar, 6Boyer L.A. Lee T.I. Cole M.F. et al.Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells.Cell. 2005; 122: 947-956Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3518) Google Scholar, 7Loh Y.H. Wu Q. Chew J.L. et al.The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells.Nat Genet. 2006; 38: 431-440Crossref PubMed Scopus (1931) Google Scholar, 8Dunn S.J. Martello G. Yordanov B. Emmott S. Smith A.G. Defining an essential transcription factor program for naive pluripotency.Science. 2014; 344: 1156-1160Crossref PubMed Scopus (265) Google Scholar]. Meanwhile, ESCs have to sense environmental cues and determine their cell fates accordingly. This is achieved by integrating environmental cues into the transcriptional regulatory network for pluripotency through signaling pathways. For example, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling promotes the self-renewal of mouse ESCs by activating the transcriptional activities of the downstream effectors Stat3 and Smad1, respectively [9Raz R. Lee C.K. Cannizzaro L.A. d'Eustachio P. Levy D.E. Essential role of STAT3 for embryonic stem cell pluripotency.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999; 96: 2846-2851Crossref PubMed Scopus (325) Google Scholar, 10Niwa H. Burdon T. Chambers I. Smith A. Self-renewal of pluripotent embryonic stem cells is mediated via activation of STAT3.Genes Dev. 1998; 12: 2048-2060Crossref PubMed Scopus (1252) Google Scholar, 11Ying Q.L. Nichols J. Chambers I. Smith A. BMP induction of Id proteins suppresses differentiation and sustains embryonic stem cell self-renewal in collaboration with STAT3.Cell. 2003; 115: 281-292Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1716) Google Scholar]. The extracellular signal-regulated kinase (Erk)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signal transduction cascade is a well-studied signaling pathway involved in cell cycle progression, proliferation, differentiation, and carcinogenesis. Through sequential activation of Ras-like GTPase, Raf, Mek, and Erk, the Erk/MAPK pathway transduces the signal of growth factors across the cell membrane [12Shaul Y.D. Seger R. The MEK/ERK cascade: From signaling specificity to diverse functions.Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007; 1773: 1213-1226Crossref PubMed Scopus (702) Google Scholar, 13Pearson G. Robinson F. Beers Gibson T. et al.Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways: Regulation and physiological functions.Endocr Rev. 2001; 22: 153-183Crossref PubMed Scopus (3543) Google Scholar]. Subsequently, activated Erk phosphorylates its downstream targets, such as Elk1, c-Fos, p53, and c-Jun, to modulate transcriptional output [14Gille H. Sharrocks A.D. Shaw P.E. Phosphorylation of transcription factor p62TCF by MAP kinase stimulates ternary complex formation at c-fos promoter.Nature. 1992; 358: 414-417Crossref PubMed Scopus (815) Google Scholar, 15Murphy L.O. Smith S. Chen R.H. Fingar D.C. Blenis J. Molecular interpretation of ERK signal duration by immediate early gene products.Nat Cell Biol. 2002; 4: 556-564Crossref PubMed Scopus (761) Google Scholar, 16Milne D.M. Campbell D.G. Caudwell F.B. Meek D.W. Phosphorylation of the tumor suppressor protein p53 by mitogen-activated protein kinases.J Biol Chem. 1994; 269: 9253-9260Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 17Morton S. Davis R.J. McLaren A. Cohen P. A reinvestigation of the multisite phosphorylation of the transcription factor c-Jun.EMBO J. 2003; 22: 3876-3886Crossref PubMed Scopus (232) Google Scholar]. Erk signaling is required for cell cycle progression and cell proliferation in differentiated somatic cells, as well as normal development [13Pearson G. Robinson F. Beers Gibson T. et al.Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways: Regulation and physiological functions.Endocr Rev. 2001; 22: 153-183Crossref PubMed Scopus (3543) Google Scholar, 18Chang L. Karin M. Mammalian MAP kinase signalling cascades.Nature. 2001; 410: 37-40Crossref PubMed Scopus (4393) Google Scholar]. Erk2 knockout mice die soon after implantation because of a failure in proper development of extra-embryonic tissues [19Hamilton W.B. Brickman J.M. Erk signaling suppresses embryonic stem cell self-renewal to specify endoderm.Cell Rep. 2014; 9: 2056-2070Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (60) Google Scholar]. Erk1 null mice are viable, fertile, and of normal size, but with compromised proliferation and maturation of thymocytes [20Pages G. Guerin S. Grall D. et al.Defective thymocyte maturation in p44 MAP kinase (Erk 1) knockout mice.Science. 1999; 286: 1374-1377Crossref PubMed Scopus (543) Google Scholar]. Erk signaling also plays important roles in regulating the self-renewal and differentiation of ESCs. In this review, we discuss the role of Erk signaling in pluripotency maintenance. There are two types of pluripotency, namely, naïve and primed. The key differences between naïve and primed pluripotency are developmental potential and signaling requirements for long-term culture. Naïve pluripotent cells, such as mouse ESCs, contribute to chimera with high efficiency and are competent for germ line transmission. However, mouse epiblast stem cells (epiSCs) with primed pluripotency exhibit only limited capacity in chimera contribution and no germ line transmission. LIF signaling is required for the maintenance of naïve pluripotency, whereas primed pluripotent cells depend on activin and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling [21Brons I.G. Smithers L.E. Trotter M.W. et al.Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos.Nature. 2007; 448: 191-195Crossref PubMed Scopus (1556) Google Scholar, 22Tesar P.J. Chenoweth J.G. Brook F.A. et al.New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells.Nature. 2007; 448: 196-199Crossref PubMed Scopus (1686) Google Scholar]. Erk signaling has been considered to be dispensable for the maintenance of naïve pluripotency. The proliferation rates of wild-type and Erk2 null mouse ESCs are not reduced by Mek inhibitors PD184352 and PD098051 [23Yao Y. Li W. Wu J. et al.Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 is necessary for mesoderm differentiation.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003; 100: 12759-12764Crossref PubMed Scopus (252) Google Scholar, 24Burdon T. Stracey C. Chambers I. Nichols J. Smith A. Suppression of SHP-2 and ERK signalling promotes self-renewal of mouse embryonic stem cells.Dev Biol. 1999; 210: 30-43Crossref PubMed Scopus (471) Google Scholar]. Moreover, inhibition of Mek facilitates maintenance of naive pluripotency. A chemically defined medium supplemented with inhibitors of Mek, Gsk3, and FGF receptor tyrosine kinases (3i) has been developed for mouse ESCs [25Ying Q.L. Wray J. Nichols J. et al.The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal.Nature. 2008; 453: 519-523Crossref PubMed Scopus (2544) Google Scholar]. Compared with the traditional mouse ESC medium with serum and LIF, the 3i culture system is indeed more permissive for ESC derivation and maintenance, allowing the derivation of germ line-competent rat ESCs [26Li P. Tong C. Mehrian-Shai R. et al.Germline competent embryonic stem cells derived from rat blastocysts.Cell. 2008; 135: 1299-1310Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (536) Google Scholar]. Mek inhibition is also widely applied in somatic cell reprogramming and establishment of naïve pluripotency. Rat induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), as well as monkey naïve iPSCs, were established in the presence of the Mek inhibitor PD0325901 [27Fang R. Liu K. Zhao Y. et al.Generation of naive induced pluripotent stem cells from rhesus monkey fibroblasts.Cell Stem Cell. 2014; 15: 488-496Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (92) Google Scholar, 28Li W. Wei W. Zhu S. et al.Generation of rat and human induced pluripotent stem cells by combining genetic reprogramming and chemical inhibitors.Cell Stem Cell. 2009; 4: 16-19Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (467) Google Scholar]. The 2i (Meki and Gsk3i) medium was used in the late stage of reprogramming mouse somatic cells by small-molecule compounds [29Hou P. Li Y. Zhang X. et al.Pluripotent stem cells induced from mouse somatic cells by small-molecule compounds.Science. 2013; 341: 651-654Crossref PubMed Scopus (990) Google Scholar]. In addition, Mek inhibitor promotes the conversion of mouse epiSCs to ESC-like cells [30Zhou H. Li W. Zhu S. et al.Conversion of mouse epiblast stem cells to an earlier pluripotency state by small molecules.J Biol Chem. 2010; 285: 29676-29680Crossref PubMed Scopus (102) Google Scholar]. Conventional human ESCs, similar to mouse epiSCs, are in the primed pluripotent state. Several groups have succeeded in establishing and maintaining human naïve pluripotent stem cells. Despite the variations in medium recipes for human naïve pluripotent stem cells among different groups, the MEK inhibitor PD0325901 is used in all studies [31Gafni O. Weinberger L. Mansour A.A. et al.Derivation of novel human ground state naive pluripotent stem cells.Nature. 2013; 520: 282-286Crossref Scopus (769) Google Scholar, 32Chan Y.S. Goke J. Ng J.H. et al.Induction of a human pluripotent state with distinct regulatory circuitry that resembles preimplantation epiblast.Cell Stem Cell. 2013; 13: 663-675Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (300) Google Scholar, 33Takashima Y. Guo G. Loos R. et al.Resetting transcription factor control circuitry toward ground-state pluripotency in human.Cell. 2014; 158: 1254-1269Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (613) Google Scholar, 34Theunissen T.W. Powell B.E. Wang H. et al.Systematic identification of culture conditions for induction and maintenance of naive human pluripotency.Cell Stem Cell. 2014; 15: 471-487Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (546) Google Scholar, 35Hanna J. Cheng A.W. Saha K. et al.Human embryonic stem cells with biological and epigenetic characteristics similar to those of mouse ESCs.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010; 107: 9222-9227Crossref PubMed Scopus (668) Google Scholar]. Conversely, activation of Mek/Erk signaling is required for ESC differentiation. Mek inhibition or knockout of the upstream activator Fgf4 for Erk signaling impairs the neural differentiation of ESCs [36Kunath T. Saba-El-Leil M.K. Almousailleakh M. Wray J. Meloche S. Smith A. FGF stimulation of the Erk1/2 signalling cascade triggers transition of pluripotent embryonic stem cells from self-renewal to lineage commitment.Development. 2007; 134: 2895-2902Crossref PubMed Scopus (597) Google Scholar, 37Stavridis M.P. Lunn J.S. Collins B.J. Storey K.G. A discrete period of FGF-induced Erk1/2 signalling is required for vertebrate neural specification.Development. 2007; 134: 2889-2894Crossref PubMed Scopus (230) Google Scholar]. Grb2 is another upstream activator for Erk signaling. Grb2 null ESCs fail to differentiate into endodermal cells during embryoid body differentiation and cannot support the formation of epiblast after injection into the blastocyst [38Cheng A.M. Saxton T.M. Sakai R. et al.Mammalian Grb2 regulates multiple steps in embryonic development and malignant transformation.Cell. 1998; 95: 793-803Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (310) Google Scholar]. Overexpression of an activated H-RAS mutant induces the trophectodermal differentiation of mouse ESCs through activation of the Mek/Erk signaling pathway [39Lu C.W. Yabuuchi A. Chen L. Viswanathan S. Kim K. Daley G.Q. Ras-MAPK signaling promotes trophectoderm formation from embryonic stem cells and mouse embryos.Nat Genet. 2008; 40: 921-926Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar]. In contrast to its role in naïve ESCs, Erk signaling is essential for maintaining primed pluripotency. Both conventional human ESCs and mouse epiSCs are cultured in the presence of FGF2, which activates the Erk signaling pathway [21Brons I.G. Smithers L.E. Trotter M.W. et al.Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos.Nature. 2007; 448: 191-195Crossref PubMed Scopus (1556) Google Scholar, 22Tesar P.J. Chenoweth J.G. Brook F.A. et al.New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells.Nature. 2007; 448: 196-199Crossref PubMed Scopus (1686) Google Scholar, 40Thomson J.A. Itskovitz-Eldor J. Shapiro S.S. et al.Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts.Science. 1998; 282: 1145-1147Crossref PubMed Scopus (12344) Google Scholar]. Importantly, ERK2 knockdown in conventional human ESCs compromises the typical human ESC colony morphology and the expression of pluripotency markers, such as NANOG, TRA1-60, TRA1-80, and SSEA4, indicating the loss of pluripotency [41Goke J. Chan Y.S. Yan J. Vingron M. Ng H.H. Genome-wide kinase-chromatin interactions reveal the regulatory network of ERK signaling in human embryonic stem cells.Mol Cell. 2013; 50: 844-855Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (70) Google Scholar]. However, as mentioned above, Mek inhibitor PD0325901 facilitates the conversion of ESCs from the primed state to the naïve pluripotent state [30Zhou H. Li W. Zhu S. et al.Conversion of mouse epiblast stem cells to an earlier pluripotency state by small molecules.J Biol Chem. 2010; 285: 29676-29680Crossref PubMed Scopus (102) Google Scholar, 31Gafni O. Weinberger L. Mansour A.A. et al.Derivation of novel human ground state naive pluripotent stem cells.Nature. 2013; 520: 282-286Crossref Scopus (769) Google Scholar, 32Chan Y.S. Goke J. Ng J.H. et al.Induction of a human pluripotent state with distinct regulatory circuitry that resembles preimplantation epiblast.Cell Stem Cell. 2013; 13: 663-675Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (300) Google Scholar, 33Takashima Y. Guo G. Loos R. et al.Resetting transcription factor control circuitry toward ground-state pluripotency in human.Cell. 2014; 158: 1254-1269Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (613) Google Scholar, 34Theunissen T.W. Powell B.E. Wang H. et al.Systematic identification of culture conditions for induction and maintenance of naive human pluripotency.Cell Stem Cell. 2014; 15: 471-487Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (546) Google Scholar, 35Hanna J. Cheng A.W. Saha K. et al.Human embryonic stem cells with biological and epigenetic characteristics similar to those of mouse ESCs.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010; 107: 9222-9227Crossref PubMed Scopus (668) Google Scholar]. It appears that Mek inhibition and ERK knockdown have opposite effects on pluripotency maintenance in conventional human ESCs, even though they both attenuate Erk signaling. It raises the concern that the conclusion based on the pharmacologic inhibitor approach might be misleading. The prevailing view, that Erk signaling is dispensable for the self-renewal of mouse ESCs, is based mainly on experiments using pharmacologic inhibitors for Mek. However, when genetic approaches are applied to study the role of Erk signaling in mouse ESCs, conflicting results emerge. Simultaneous knockdown of Raf-A, Raf-B, and Raf-C, upstream activators of Mek/Erk signaling, inhibits the survival and proliferation of mouse ESCs, implying Erk signaling is required for mouse ESCs [42Guo W. Hao B. Wang Q. Lu Y. Yue J. Requirement of B-Raf, C-Raf, and A-Raf for the growth and survival of mouse embryonic stem cells.Exp Cell Res. 2013; 319: 2801-2811Crossref Scopus (11) Google Scholar]. To clarify the role of Erk signaling in mouse ESCs and rule out the concerns over pharmacologic inhibitor, we attempted to knock out both alleles of Erk1 and Erk2 genes in mouse ESCs with TALENs and CRISPR/Cas. Even though Erk1 or Erk2 can be knocked out efficiently in WT ESCs, two alleles of Erk1 cannot be disrupted simultaneously in Erk2−/− ESCs, or vice versa [43Chen H. Guo R. Zhang Q. et al.Erk signaling is indispensable for genomic stability and self-renewal of mouse embryonic stem cells.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015; 112: E5936-E5943Crossref Scopus (70) Google Scholar]. These data imply that Erk is required for the self-renewal and proliferation of mouse ESCs. Next, both endogenous Erk1 and Erk2 genes were disrupted in an ESC line harboring a doxycycline (Dox)-inducible Erk1 transgene, resulting in iErk1, Erk KO ESCs. In the presence of Dox, iErk1, Erk KO ESCs grow like WT ESCs, because of the expression of exogenous Erk1. On Dox withdrawal, Erk1 expression diminishes, achieving the knockout of Erk. With iErk1, Erk KO ESCs, we demonstrated that Erk depletion reduces proliferation rate, alters the cell cycle structure, induces cell apoptosis, compromises the expression of pluripotency genes, and leads to rapid telomere shortening and genomic instability [43Chen H. Guo R. Zhang Q. et al.Erk signaling is indispensable for genomic stability and self-renewal of mouse embryonic stem cells.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015; 112: E5936-E5943Crossref Scopus (70) Google Scholar]. Thus, genetic manipulation of Erk signaling clearly demonstrates that Erk signaling is essential for the self-renewal and genomic stability of mouse ESCs. Experiments using pharmacologic inhibitors for Mek support the prevailing view that Erk signaling is dispensable for the self-renewal of mouse ESCs. Yet, our genetic experiments reveal the essential role of Erk signaling in mouse ESCs. The discrepancy may be caused by differential suppression effects on Erk signaling by Mek inhibition and Erk knockout. We indeed noticed that phosphorylation of Erk is not completely blocked by PD0325901 in mouse ESCs. Rather, Mek inhibition only reduces Erk phosphorylation (p-Erk) transiently, and the level of p-Erk bounces back to a level similar to or even slightly higher than that in untreated cells [43Chen H. Guo R. Zhang Q. et al.Erk signaling is indispensable for genomic stability and self-renewal of mouse embryonic stem cells.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015; 112: E5936-E5943Crossref Scopus (70) Google Scholar]. It is likely due to the negative feedback regulation between Mek and Erk [44Fritsche-Guenther R. Witzel F. Sieber A. et al.Strong negative feedback from Erk to Raf confers robustness to MAPK signalling.Mol Syst Biol. 2011; 7: 489Crossref PubMed Scopus (142) Google Scholar, 45Sturm O.E. Orton R. Grindlay J. et al.The mammalian MAPK/ERK pathway exhibits properties of a negative feedback amplifier.Sci Signal. 2010; 3: ra90Crossref PubMed Scopus (194) Google Scholar]. In contrast, on Dox withdrawal, Erk and p-Erk are diminished in iErk1, Erk KO ESCs. Thus, the complete loss of Erk might compromise the self-renewal and genomic stability of mouse ESCs, whereas Mek inhibition promotes self-renewal. The next question is how Mek inhibition facilitates pluripotency maintenance, given that p-Erk level is not reduced by PD0325901. One possibility is that the off-target effect of Mek inhibitor, but not Mek inhibition itself, promotes pluripotency maintenance. Nevertheless, multiple Mek inhibitors, including U0126, PD98059, PD184352, and PD0325901, have been reported to promote pluripotency maintenance [24Burdon T. Stracey C. Chambers I. Nichols J. Smith A. Suppression of SHP-2 and ERK signalling promotes self-renewal of mouse embryonic stem cells.Dev Biol. 1999; 210: 30-43Crossref PubMed Scopus (471) Google Scholar, 25Ying Q.L. Wray J. Nichols J. et al.The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal.Nature. 2008; 453: 519-523Crossref PubMed Scopus (2544) Google Scholar, 46Niwa H. Ogawa K. Shimosato D. Adachi K. A parallel circuit of LIF signalling pathways maintains pluripotency of mouse ES cells.Nature. 2009; 460: 118-122Crossref PubMed Scopus (677) Google Scholar]. Therefore, it rules out the possibility that the off-target effects of Mek inhibitors account for their function in pluripotency maintenance. Alternatively, Mek might regulate downstream effector(s) other than Erk (Fig. 1). Erk1/2 has been conceived as the only downstream targets for Mek kinases [12Shaul Y.D. Seger R. The MEK/ERK cascade: From signaling specificity to diverse functions.Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007; 1773: 1213-1226Crossref PubMed Scopus (702) Google Scholar, 13Pearson G. Robinson F. Beers Gibson T. et al.Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways: Regulation and physiological functions.Endocr Rev. 2001; 22: 153-183Crossref PubMed Scopus (3543) Google Scholar]. Yet, a recent study challenged this view. HSF1 is identified as a novel MEK substrate [47Tang Z. Dai S. He Y. et al.MEK guards proteome stability and inhibits tumor-suppressive amyloidogenesis via HSF1.Cell. 2015; 160: 729-744Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (111) Google Scholar]. Our RNA sequencing data also reveal that a significant group of genes are regulated by Mek inhibitors in mouse ESCs, regardless of the presence or absence of Erk, suggesting an Erk-independent function of Mek [43Chen H. Guo R. Zhang Q. et al.Erk signaling is indispensable for genomic stability and self-renewal of mouse embryonic stem cells.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015; 112: E5936-E5943Crossref Scopus (70) Google Scholar]. The Erk-independent function of Mek might contribute to pluripotency maintenance. What are the additional downstream target(s) of Mek? How do they promote pluripotency maintenance? Further studies are required to address these questions. Our genetic data suggest an essential role of Erk signaling in mouse ESCs. Is Erk signaling always beneficial for pluripotency maintenance? The answer is no. It is noticeable that within the first 48 hours after Erk depletion, pluripotency genes Nanog and Oct4 are upregulated, even though the expression levels of Nanog and Oct4 drop at passage 3 after Erk depletion [43Chen H. Guo R. Zhang Q. et al.Erk signaling is indispensable for genomic stability and self-renewal of mouse embryonic stem cells.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015; 112: E5936-E5943Crossref Scopus (70) Google Scholar]. These data suggest that Erk signaling also suppresses the self-renewal of mouse ESCs. Indeed, many factors, including Dusp2, Dusp7, Dusp9, and March5, suppress Erk signaling to promote pluripotency maintenance [48Gu H. Li Q. Huang S. et al.Mitochondrial E3 ligase March5 maintains stemness of mouse ES cells via suppression of ERK signalling.Nat Commun. 2015; 6: 7112Crossref Scopus (24) Google Scholar, 49Li Z. Fei T. Zhang J. et al.BMP4 signaling acts via dual-specificity phosphatase 9 to control ERK activity in mouse embryonic stem cells.Cell Stem Cell. 2012; 10: 171-182Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (112) Google Scholar, 50Chappell J. Sun Y. Singh A. Dalton S. MYC/MAX control ERK signaling and pluripotency by regulation of dual-specificity phosphatases 2 and 7.Genes Dev. 2013; 27: 725-733Crossref PubMed Scopus (50) Google Scholar]. It has been found that Erk signaling negatively regulates ESC self-renewal by phosphorylating pluripotency factors. For example, Klf4 is phosphorylated by Erk1 and Erk2 at Ser123, leading to recruitment of ubiquitin E3 ligase mediated by βTrCP1 and βTrCP2, Klf4 ubiquitination and degradation [51Kim M.O. Kim S.H. Cho Y.Y. et al.ERK1 and ERK2 regulate embryonic stem cell self-renewal through phosphorylation of Klf4.Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012; 19: 283-290Crossref PubMed Scopus (125) Google Scholar]. Erk signaling stimulates Parp1 auto-poly(ADP)-ribosylation, which in turn stabilizes the interaction between Parp1 and Sox2. Consequently, the binding of Sox2 to Oct4/Sox2 enhancers is inhibited [52Lai Y.S. Chang C.W. Pawlik K.M. Zhou D. Renfrow M.B. Townes T.M. SRY (sex determining region Y)–box2 (Sox2)/poly ADP-ribose polymerase 1 (Parp1) complexes regulate pluripotency.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012; 109: 3772-3777Crossref PubMed Scopus (44) Google Scholar]. Erk kinases also phosphorylate Nanog, resulting in reduced Nanog transactivation activity and protein stability [53Brumbaugh J. Russell J.D. Yu P. Westphall M.S. Coon J.J. Thomson J.A. NANOG is multiply phosphorylated and directly modified by ERK2 and CDK1 in vitro.Stem Cell Rep. 2014; 2: 18-25Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (36) Google Scholar, 54Kim S.H. Kim M.O. Cho Y.Y. et al.ERK1 phosphorylates Nanog to regulate protein stability and stem cell self-renewal.Stem Cell Res. 2014; 13: 1-11Crossref Scopus (69) Google Scholar]. Moreover, Erk is involved in maintaining the poised transcription status of developmental genes in mouse ESCs. At the promoters of some developmental genes, Erk1/2 binding may exclude the recruitment of TFIIH and phosphorylate RNA polymerase II at Ser5 to maintain a poised transcription status. Subsequently, Erk facilitates the recruitment of PRC2 complex to maintain the permissive chromatin environment at these developmental genes. Inactivation of Erk1/2 leads to a more “inert” chromatin status for developmental genes, thus preventing ESC differentiation [55Tee W.W. Shen S.S. Oksuz O. Narendra V. Reinberg D. Erk1/2 activity promotes chromatin features and RNAPII phosphorylation at developmental promoters in mouse ESCs.Cell. 2014; 156: 678-690Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (109) Google Scholar]. Thus, Erk signaling has a dual role in mouse ESCs. On one hand, minimum activity of Erk signaling is necessary for cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, suppression of apoptosis, telomere length maintenance, and genomic stability. On the other hand, Erk signaling may repress self-renewal of mouse ESCs, through downregulation of pluripotency factors and activation of developmental genes (Fig. 1). On LIF withdrawal, spontaneous differentiation of mouse ESCs is associated with Erk activation [56Lee E.R. McCool K.W. Murdoch F.E. Fritsch M.K. Dynamic changes in histone H3 phosphoacetylation during early embryonic stem cell differentiation are directly mediated by mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase 1 via activation of MAPK pathways.J Biol Chem. 2006; 281: 21162-21172Crossref PubMed Scopus (43) Google Scholar]. For ESCs cultured in 2i medium, withdrawal of PD0325901 induces not only Erk activation, but also the exit from pluripotency [57Yang S.H. Kalkan T. Morrisroe C. Smith A. Sharrocks A.D. A genome-wide RNAi screen reveals MAP kinase phosphatases as key ERK pathway regulators during embryonic stem cell differentiation.PLoS Genet. 2012; 8: e1003112Crossref PubMed Scopus (58) Google Scholar]. Therefore, an optimal level of Erk signaling balancing these two opposing effects has to be maintained for the self-renewal of mouse ESCs (Fig. 2). It becomes clear that Erk signaling is essential for the self-renewal of mouse ESCs. However, how Erk signaling regulates the self-renewal and genomic stability of mouse ESCs remains to be explored. In particular, Erk depletion leads to DNA damage at telomeres and rapid telomere shortening. How does Erk protect the integrity of telomeres and maintain the length of telomeres? Maintaining genomic stability of ESCs is essential for minimizing the risk of tumorigenesis in therapeutic application of ESC-derived cells. Thus, an understanding of the mechanism underlying Erk signaling in genomic stability maintenance will be beneficial for cell replacement therapies. Other than Erk1/2 and HSF1, what are the Mek immediate downstream targets? How do they function in pluripotency maintenance? These are key questions. Characterization of the Erk-independent function of Mek will not only shed light on molecular mechanism of pluripotency maintenance, but also have a huge impact on cancer therapy targeting the Mek/Erk signaling pathway. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 31271547 and 31470081), the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin, China (Grant 14JCYBJC23600), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents (Grant NCET-13-0293), and the 111 Project Grant (B08011).