Abstract:BackgroundSurfactants are widely used across the globe both in industrial and consumer products. The n-octanol/water partition ratio or coefficient (log Kow) and n-octanol/water distribution coefficient (log D) are key parameters in environmental risk assessment of chemicals as they are often used to estimate the environmental fate and bioavailability and thus exposure and toxicity of a compound. Determining log Kow data for surfactants is a technical challenge due to their amphiphilic properties. Currently several existing experimental OECD methods (e.g. slow-stirring, HPLC, solubility ratio) and QSPR models are available for log Kow/D measurement or prediction. However, there are concerns that these methods have not been fully validated for surfactants and may not be applicable due to the specific phase behaviour of surfactants.ResultsThe current methods were evaluated for the four surfactant classes (non-ionic, anionic, cationic and amphoteric). The solubility ratio approach, based on comparative n-octanol and water solubility measurements, did not generate robust or accurate data. The HPLC method generates consistently higher log Kow values than the slow-stirring method for non-ionics, but this positive bias could be removed using reference surfactants with log Kow values determined using the slow-stirring method. The slow-stirring method is the most widely applicable experimental method for generating log Kow/D data for all the surface-active test compounds. Generally, QSPR-predicted log Kow/D values do not correlate well with experimental values, apart for the group of non-ionic surfactants. Relatively, large differences in predicted log Kow/D values were observed when comparing various QSPR models, which were most noticeable for the ionised surfactants.ConclusionsThe slow-stirring method is the most widely applicable experimental method for generating log Kow/D data for all the four surfactant classes. A weight of evidence approach is considered appropriate for non-ionic surfactants using experimental and model predications. However, it is more difficult to apply this approach to ionisable surfactants. Recommendations are made for the preferred existing QSPR predictive methods for determination of log Kow/D values for the surfactant classes. Investigation of newer alternative experimental log Kow methods as well as more biologically relevant and methodologically defensible alternative methods for describing partitioning of surfactants are recommended.

Partitioning of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons to Solid-Sorbed Nonionic Surfactants

The Partitioning Of Pahs To Egg Phospholipids Facilitated By Copper And Proton Binding Via Cation-Pi Interactions

Effect of Soil Components on the Surfactant-Enhanced Soil Sorption of PAHs

Solubilization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by anionic–nonionic mixed surfactant

Solubility enhancement of dioxins and PCBs by surfactant monomers and micelles quantified with polymer depletion techniques

Sorption Behavior of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil–Water System Containing Nonionic Surfactant

[Characterization of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Dissolved in Nonionic Surfactants].

Partitioning regularity of nonionic organic mixtures in organic phase/water system

Distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil-water system containing a nonionic surfactant.

Effect of Surfactant on Sorption of Polar Organic Compounds in Sediment

Sorption Characteristics of Phenanthrene and Pyrene to Surfactant-Modified Peat from Aqueous Solution: the Contribution of Partition and Adsorption

Equilibrium partition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in cloud point extraction with a silicone surfactant.

Surface-Bulk Partition of Surfactants Predicted by Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Hydrophobic Sorption Properties of an Extended Series of Anionic Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Characterized by C18 Chromatographic Retention Measurement

Gas/particle Partitioning of PAHs Based on Equilibrium-State Model and Steady-State Model.

A comparison of log Kow (n-octanol–water partition coefficient) values for non-ionic, anionic, cationic and amphoteric surfactants determined using predictions and experimental methods

A Promising Surfactant for Enhanced Sorption and Desorption of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Predictive Models of Gas/Particulate Partition Coefficients (KP) for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Their Oxygen/Nitrogen Derivatives

Determination and Prediction of Partitioning Properties for O,O'‐dialkyl, O?‐(substituted Phenylglyoxylonitrile‐oximino) Phosphates and Thiophosphates

Interactions of Organic Contaminants with Mineral-Adsorbed Surfactants.

Partitioning behavior and mechanism of polyhalogenated carbazoles in water and suspended particulate matter