Abstract:Purpose The paper seeks to provide academic researchers and practitioners with a better understanding about purchasing strategies through an integrated approach to supplier selection and purchasing decisions. Design/methodology/approach This paper views supplier selection as a multi‐criteria problem. Through the analytical hierarchy process (AHP), in consideration of both quantitative and qualitative criteria, a set of candidate suppliers is identified. A multi‐objective linear programming (MOLP) model, with multiple objectives and a set of system constraints, is then formulated and solved to allocate the optimum order quantities to the candidate suppliers. Findings The paper provides tradeoffs among different objectives, which are more consistent with the complexity and nature of the real‐world decision‐making environment. It also offers better information and solutions supporting effective purchasing decisions. Research limitations/implications The main concept of the proposed approach can be applicable to any organization with a purchasing function. However, its implementation will be very specific to a particular organization of interest, as each individual organization must define its own subjective criteria and constraints. The area of decision support system development, which automates (or computerizes) the input process of the proposed models and integrates with other databases in a company, will provide great opportunities for future research. Practical implications The paper provides practitioners with flexibility and effectiveness in their supplier selection and purchasing decision process and with a better understanding about their future purchasing strategies. The results from the application of the proposed models to the supplier selection problem at a high‐technology firm in Taiwan show that the models are effective and applicable. Originality/value This paper takes an integrated approach to problem analysis (i.e. multi‐objectives with both quantitative and qualitative information), uses a sound scientific methodology in model development (i.e. integrating AHP with MOLP), and provides practical use of the models. It offers additional knowledge and value to both academics and practitioners.

An AHP /PROMETHEE Based Method of Selecting Supplier

Application of PROMETHEE method for green supplier selection: a comparative result based on preference functions

A Method of Suppliers Evaluation Based on Fuzzy Decision and AHP in SCM

Integration of Data Envelopment Analysis with Analytical Hierarchy Process and Entropy Measurement in the Optimization of Supplier Selection

An integrated approach for supplier selection and purchasing decisions

Supplier selection using combined analytical hierarchy process and grey relational analysis

A Decision Support Tool for Supplier Evaluation and Selection

An Integrated Methodology using Linguistic PROMETHEE and Maximum Deviation Method for Third-party Logistics Supplier Selection

Double quantitative fuzzy rough set-based improved AHP method and application to supplier selection decision making

An effective AHP-based metaheuristic approach to solve supplier selection problem

Multicriteria Decision Making in Supply Chain Management Using FMEA and Hybrid AHP-PROMETHEE Algorithms

Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Application in Supplier Selection

Green supplier selection using an AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS framework

Developing a supplier selection system through integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy DEA: a case study on an auto lighting system company in Taiwan

An AHP/DEA Methodology for 3PL Vendor Selection in 4PL

Supplier selection using analytic network process and data envelopment analysis

Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach

New hybrid AHP-QFD-PROMETHEE decision-making support method in the hesitant fuzzy environment: an application in packaging design selection

An integrated decision-making approach for global supplier selection and order allocation to create an environment-friendly supply chain

Supplier Selection Problem by Applying Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) Methodology