Study on the effect of the complement in the discordant heart xenotransplantation produced by intrathymic inoculation with xenogeneic antigen and whole-body γ-radiation using the model of pig to monkey

QU Ji-Chen,SHEN Zhen-Ya,JIANG Ge-Ning,DING Jia-An,GAO Wen,NI Bin,ZHANG Zhi,HE Jian-Ming,YU Yun-Sheng,YE Wen-Xue
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the validation of the complement in the discordant heart xenotransplantation produced by intrathymic inoculation with xenogeneic antigen and whole-body γ-radiation using the model of pig to monkey.Methods:In this experiment,pig and monkey were selected as donor and recipient respectively.And were divided randomly into three groups.The blank group(group A):recipients didn't accept any treatments but heart xenotransplantation;Whole body irradiation group(group B):received 3 Gy(60Co)WBI on 28 day before transplantation;Irradiation and intrathymic injection group(group C):the monkeys pretreated by WBI and the intrathymic injection of pig spleen cells.In erery group,monkeys were performed heterotopic heart xenotransplantation in order to observe the survival time of cardiac xenografts.Results:The experimental results of this study showed that the survival time of donor heart in the irradiation and intrathymic injection(IT and WBI)group (91.1±22.8) was significantly longer than the blank group (36.6±5.8)(P<0.01).The results of MLR showed that there was significant reduction in the IT and WBI group than in the blank group.After xenotransplantation,the level of elicited xenorecative antibody(EXA) IgM and IgG in the group C ascended slower than that in group A and group B obviously(P<0.01).After rejection the level of CD46 declined greaterly than that before transplantation.Conclusion:These results suggest that pretreatment with IT and WBI could induce T cells immune suppression,and restrain the production of elicited xenorecative antibody IgM and IgG.But it could not restrain the activation of complement via the classical pathway in the hyperacute rejection and delayed xenograft rejection.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?