Constructing Security "Threats":U.S. Strategy and Political Options

Liu Yongtao
2010-01-01
Abstract:There is a constant phenomenon in international politics that hyper-powerful states like the United States often seek and construct for themselves external (and potential) security "threats" ,including repeatedly narrating (potential) "competitors/rivals" and "enemies" that they (will) encounter. Such practices of (re)structuring national security "threats" and "enemies" ,however,seem to be in contradiction with the conventional logics and knowledge in international politics. Besides providing "legitimacy" and "justification" of governments' foreign policy acts,do these practices have other hidden or untold political ends? The insights of causal relationship between the construction of "threats" and social control highlighted by modern European sociologists offer a point of departure for the comprehension of the practices. This article assumes that if judging,recognizing and identifying national security threats,diplomatic crises,and enemies are determined in the end by the U.S. statesmen and decision-makers,the construction of national security "threats" and "enemies" can be a political option in U.S. strategy. As the narration of security cultures is a political process,discourses on national security "threats" and "enemies" are not necessarily the real reflections of objective reality,nor the products of contingent or isolated discursive representation. A series of national security "threats" and "enemies" produced by U.S. governments over the past decades have revealed and illustrated empirically how the construction of national security "threats" and "enemies" has been taken as political options in U.S. strategy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?