Reactivity Differences Between Nickel and Palladium Complexes Bearing 1,2-Diphosphino-1,2-dicarba-dodecaborane Ligand

Xu-Qiong Xiao,Guo-Xin Jin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorganchem.2010.08.054
IF: 2.345
2011-01-01
Journal of Organometallic Chemistry
Abstract:AgOTf (OTf = trifluoromethanesulfonate) shows the reactivity differences when it reacts with carborane complexes [MCl2{(PPh2)(2)(C2B10H10)}] (M = Ni (2), Pd (3)). The reaction of AgOTf with the palladium complex 3 affords [Pd-2(mu-OTf)(2){(PPh2)(2)(C2B9H10)}(2)] (4) in high yields, while corresponding reaction between the nickel complex 2 and AgOTf leads to the formation of binuclear complexes [Ni {(PPh2)(2)(C2B9H10)}](mu-Cl)(2)[Ag{(PPh2)(2)(C2B10H10)}] (5) and [Ag-2(mu-Cl)(2) {(PPh2)(2) (C2B10H10)}2] (6). The carborane cage of complexes 4 and 5 were broken to form nido-carboranes. It is believed the group 10 metals themselves play an important role in opening the closo-carborane skeleton. Directly stirring [(PPh2)(2)(C2B10H10)] with AgOTf afforded [Ag-2(mu-OTf)(2){(PPh2)(2)(C2B10H10)}(2)] (7), which is also used to react with 2 and 3. The reaction between 2 and 7 gives only 4 in high yields, however, stirring the mixture of 3 and 7 affords [Pd-2(mu-Cl)(2){(PPh2)(2)(C2B9H10)}(2)] (8), [Pd{(PPh2)(2)(C2B9H10)}(2)] (9) and 6. All these complexes have been characterized by IR, H-1 NMR, B-11 NMR and elemental analyses. Complexes 2, 4-9 have also been determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses. (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?