Forty Years of Open and Reform: in Restrospect and in Prospect
Yan Shen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2018.1529876
2018-01-01
China Economic Journal
Abstract:The Third Plenary Session of the 11th Central Committee, held between December 18 and 22, 1978, marked the prelude to China’s reform and opening-up policy. Since then, the world has witnessed China’s economic growthmiracle of the past 40 years. With an average real growth rate of gross domestic product (GDP) of around 9 percent, China’s GDP share over world total GDP increased from 2.5 percent in 1978 to over 15 percent in 2017. However, in recent years, China has entered the “new normal” stage in which economic growth has appeared to slow down. The after-tax return to capital dropped to 4.17 percent in 2013 (Bai and Zhang 2014). The demographic dividend contributed 26.8 percent to the growth of per capita GDP during 1982 to 2000, but the dividend is disappearing (Cai and Wang 2005). Demand for exports decreased sharply after the 2008 financial crisis and may decrease further under a looming trade war. China is at a crossroads: the growth strategy that relies on exports, cheap labor, and often at the price of sacrificing the environment is no longer sustainable. To avoid the middleincome trap, new sustainable growth strategies are imperative. As deepening the unfinished reform to tackle the challenge has been the consensus, it is time to summarize what China has done right over the past 40 years and what can be further reformed in the future. We devote this special issue to this goal. The issue covers six topics: the political economy background of the reform and opening-up policy, the population dividend, changes in rural institutions and village governance, development of the exchange rate scheme, international trade during the opening-up process, and the trade war with the United States. Yang Yao’s paper, “An Anatomy of the Chinese Selectocracy,” provides a political economy explanation of China’s economic success, as opening to international trade and investment alone cannot ensure successful growth. The paper depicts the reform as an interactive process between local experiments and changes in the ideology of the central government. The changes in ideology are characterized as a de-politicization process of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Yao characterizes the central government as disinterested, that is, the government favors the social or political group that can bring success to the economic reforms, but not any specific group consistently. The “selectocracy” selects local officials largely based on merit, evaluated based on the officials’ ability to develop the economy and their loyalty to the central government. Consequently, the CCP is no longer a conventional political party but an institution of China’s constitutional setup, molded by successful economic reforms. After comparing