Comparison of analgesic effect and delivery outcome of three intraspinal labor analgesia methods used in latent phase of the first stage of labor

LI Jingzhu,WANG Yan,JI Xianghong,KANG Linping,LIU Yuqiu,SHI Fei,BI Yanlin,WANG Mingshan,ZHAO Shengjun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-7210.2012.27.038
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the analgesic effect and delivery outcome of three intraspinal labor analgesia methods used in latent phase of the first stage of labor.Methods A retrospective analysis was made to 1 365 cases of singleton full-month primipara who were treated with latent phase labor analgesia in our hospital during 5 years.In accordance with the analgesic methods,those primiparas were divided into double pipes epidural block group(group A) of 423 cases,single pipe epidural block group(group B) of 436 cases,combined spinal epidural block group(group C) of 506 cases.Analysis index: ①time of the active phase of the first stage of labor,the second stage of labor,the third stage of labor;②maternal pain visual analogue score(VAS);③interim cesarean section rate,rate of oxytocin use,lateral episiotomy rate,instrumental delivery rate;④related complications discharged 6 weeks.Results ①Time of the active phase of the first stage of labor and the second stage of group A was shorter than that of group B and group C(P < 0.05).Time of the third stage was not different among group A,group B and group C(P > 0.05).Labor time of group B and group C had no difference(P > 0.05).②VAS score of group A was significantly reduced than group B and group C(P < 0.05),VAS score of group B and group C had no difference(P > 0.05).③Cesarean section rate,rate of oxytocin use,lateral episiotomy rate,instrumental delivery rate of group A were significantly lower than those of group B and group C(P < 0.05),those between group B and group C had no differences(P > 0.05).④Incidence of pregnant backache and lumbago among three groups had no differences(P > 0.05),and there was no other related complication.Conclusion Analgesic effect and delivery outcome of double pipes epidural block is superior to single pipe epidural block and combined spinal epidural block.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?