Abstract:BACKGROUNDThe global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) guidelines classify patients into four groups according to the number of symptoms and the level of future risk of acute exacerbation COPD (AECOPD). This study aimed to compare the results of different methods used in diagnosis of COPD and evaluate the accuracy of the assessment methods in guiding clinical practice.METHODSA survey was conducted of 194 COPD outpatients between March and September 2012. Demographic characteristics, the number of exacerbations the patient has had within the previous 12 months, COPD assessment test (CAT), Modified British Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale, and results of the lung function tests were recorded.RESULTSOf the 194 patients assessed, 21 had a CAT score ≥10 and an mMRC grade ≤1, 13 had a CAT score <10 and an mMRC grade ≥2. A predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1%) of <50% with less than two acute exacerbations was observed in 39 patients, while a predicted FEV1% of ≥50% was noted in 20 patients with two or more acute exacerbations. The sensitivity of a predicted FEV1% <50% in predicting the risk of AECOPD in the future was 80.9%, while that in the real number of AECOPD events recorded was 62.8%, the difference being statistically significant (P = 0.004). The sensitivity of CAT in predicting the severity of symptoms was 90%, while that of mMRC was 83.8%, and the difference was not statistically significant.CONCLUSIONSThe COPD assessment method recommended by the global initiative for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (GOLD) 2011 is complicated and should be simplified. CAT is more comprehensive and accurate than mMRC. The lung function classification is a better tool for predicting the risk of AECOPD in the future, and the number of AECOPD can be referred to when required.

The Comparison of The efficarcy Assessment Indexes from Recurrent Event Data

Evaluating dynamic and predictive discrimination for recurrent event models: use of a time-dependent C-index

Applied analysis of recurrent events: a practical overview

Statistical Model of Scientific Research Evaluation

Evaluation Methods and Empirical Analysis for Non-Experimental Data

Experimental Comparison of Ensemble Methods and Time-to-Event Analysis Models Through Integrated Brier Score and Concordance Index

Efficient estimation of Cox model with random change point

Methods to Analyze Time-to-Event Data: The Cox Regression Analysis

Comparison of cause specific rate functions of panel count data with multiple modes of recurrence

Interim monitoring of longitudinal comparative studies with recurrent event responses

A Comparison Of Exponentially Weighted Moving Average- Based Methods For Monitoring Increases In Incidence Rate With Varying Population Size

A Nonparametric Statistical Method for Two Crossing Survival Curves

Comparison of cumulative incidence functions of current status competing risks data with discrete observation times

Recurrent Events Analysis With Data Collected at Informative Clinical Visits in Electronic Health Records

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON EVALUATION METHODS OF EMERGENCY VENTILATION STRATEGIES

Assessing Cardiovascular Function Status with Non-linear Indexes from HRV of Exercise Testing

A Threshold-free Prospective Prediction Accuracy Measure for Censored Time to Event Data

Comparison of Objective Weight Determination Methods in Network Performance Evaluation

Comparison of Symptom and Risk Assessment Methods among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Nonparametric comparison of survival functions based on interval-censored data with unequal censoring.

Alternative Analysis Methods for Time to Event Endpoints under Non-proportional Hazards: A Comparative Analysis