Determination of flavonoids in propolis-rich functional foods by reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection

Chunying Luo,Xiaoli Zou,Yuanqian Li,Chengjun Sun,Yan Jiang,Zhiyun Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.01.006

IF: 8.8

2011-01-01

Food Chemistry

Abstract:A method of reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) coupled with a diode array detector (DAD) was developed for the simultaneous determination of 10 common flavonoids in propolis-rich functional foods. Flavonoids in a sample were extracted with methanol in an ultrasonic bath for 15 min and then chromatographically separated on a C 18 column. The binary mobile phase, composed of water with 1% tetrahydrofuran (pH = 2.5) and acetonitrile, was used for gradient elution. The proposed method revealed a good linearity between the peak area of each analyte and its concentration. The intra- and inter-day relative standard deviations (RSDs) were less than 1.90% and 4.91%, respectively. Recoveries were within the range of 84.2–118.7%. LODs and LOQs were 0.043–0.232 μg mL −1 ( S / N = 3) and 0.007–0.039 mg g −1 ( S / N = 10), respectively. The proposed method provided a simple and rapid routine analysis of common flavonoids in propolis-rich functional foods which are popular on the market nowadays. Keywords Flavonoids Propolis Functional foods High performance liquid chromatography 1 Introduction Propolis is a resinous material that honeybees (mainly Apis mellifera L.) collect from leaf buds and cracks in the bark of the poplar ( Populus ) genus and other tree species ( Burdock, 1998 ). Propolis has been recognized and employed extensively as an effective natural remedy over the centuries ( Castaldo & Capasso, 2002 ). There is further evidence based on modern scientific studies that propolis exhibits a wide range of biological and pharmacological properties, such as hepatoprotective, antitumor, antioxidative, antimicrobial and antiinflammatory properties ( Banskota, Tezuka, & Kadota, 2001 ). Although more than 300 constituents have been identified in propolis during the past few years, these functional properties are mainly ascribed to a few substances, principally polyphenols of flavonoids, phenolic acids and their esters, etc., of which flavonoids in particular are considered as top contributors ( de Vecchi & Drago, 2007 ). Flavonoids, existing in the form of aglycones and glycosides, are a large family of secondary metabolites commonly found in plants. The flavonoids in propolis were also confirmed as having botanical origins ( Kumazawa et al., 2003 ). In recent years, there has been increasing interest in flavonoids, promoted by their visible beneficial effects on health, such as antioxidant properties, estrogenic action, and a wide spectrum of antimicrobial and pharmacological activities ( Stobiecki, 2000 ). Unfortunately, flavonoids cannot be biologically synthesized in the human body, and our diet, i.e., vegetables, fruits and beverages, naturally, acts as the principal supplier of flavonoids for us though the total flavonoid consumption per person varies markedly around the world ( Beecher, 2003 ). Today, more and more people also rely on functional foods for nutrient supplement. Propolis and its products, because of their high flavonoid content, are attracting even more attention. For example, in China, dozens of new propolis-rich functional foods have been approved by the Ministry of Health, launched into the market in every recent year and consumed by large populations for higher intakes of flavonoids with the purpose of improving health and preventing diseases such as inflammation, heart disease, diabetes, and even cancer ( Banskota et al., 2001 ). To ensure the reliability of pharmacological and clinical research, to understand their bioactivities, and to enhance product quality control and assessment, it is of great significance and necessity to establish an appropriate analytical method for the routine assay of flavonoids in functional foods ( Cao, Wang, & Yuan, 2004 ). Many different methods, e.g., spectrophotometry ( Alencar et al., 2007; de Funari, de Oliveira Ferro, & Mathor, 2007; Kalogeropoulos, Konteles, Troullidou, Mourtzinos, & Karathanos, 2009 ), thin layer chromatography (TLC) ( Alencar et al., 2007; Park, Alencar, & Aguiar, 2002; Park et al., 1998 ), gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) ( Alencar et al., 2007; Fernández et al., 2008; Kalogeropoulos et al., 2009 ), high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) ( Alencar et al., 2007; de Funari et al., 2007; Kumazawa, Hamasaka, & Nakayama, 2004; Kumazawa et al., 2003; Lima et al., 2009; Park et al., 1998, 2002; Pietta, Gardana, & Pietta, 2002; Zhou et al., 2008 ), HPLC–MS ( Gardana, Scaglianti, Pietta, & Simonetti, 2007; Kumazawa et al., 2003; Medana, Carbone, Aigotti, Appendino, & Baiocchi, 2008; Pietta et al., 2002; Volpi & Bergonzini, 2006 ) and capillary electrophoresis (CE) ( Cao et al., 2004; Fu, Yang, Wen, & Chern, 2005; Jiang, Fang, Zhang, Cao, & Wang, 2008 ), have been developed to analyse propolis flavonoids. Spectrophotometry based on the colour reaction is frequently applied to evaluate the total content of flavonoids. TLC is especially useful for the rapid screening of propolis for bioactive components before detailed instrumental analysis. GC provides excellent resolution but usually needs an extra derivatization step, prior to analysis, to make flavonoids suitable for analysis. CE is a relatively novel separation technique and considered an alternative to HPLC for flavonoid analysis, with the advantages of rapidity, high separation efficiency and low cost ( Jiang et al., 2008 ), but the repeatability seems inferior to that of HPLC. Among the methods mentioned above, HPLC currently represents, without a doubt, the most prevalent and reliable analytical technique for the characterization of polyphenolic compounds ( Gómez-Caravaca, Gómez-Romero, Arráez-Román, Segura-Carretero, & Fernández-Gutiérrez, 2006 ), as witnessed by a list of papers cited above. However, of the previously reported studies on the assay of propolis, the majority were, to the best of our knowledge, focused on identification and quantification of flavonoids in merely samples of raw propolis. In other words, very few practical applications were adopted for the assay of commercial propolis products ( Cao et al., 2004; Fu et al., 2005; Jiang et al., 2008; Pietta et al., 2002 ), and HPLC was reported even less ( Pietta et al., 2002 ). In addition, many analytical methods contained complex elution procedures and/or required a long analysis time ( Alencar et al., 2007; de Funari et al., 2007; Gardana et al., 2007; Kumazawa et al., 2004; Lima et al., 2009; Park et al., 1998, 2002 ). Traditionally, extraction of flavonoids in raw propolis is carried out by means of marinated, shaking, reflux and Soxhlet extraction ( Alencar et al., 2007; de Funari et al., 2007; Fernández et al., 2008; Fu et al., 2005 ), which usually are time- and solvent-consuming. Ultrasonic-assisted extraction has the advantages of less extraction time and high extraction efficiency ( Jiang et al., 2008; Zhou et al., 2008 ). Therefore the rapid and efficient ultrasonic-assisted extraction was used for extraction of functional foods in this work. Consequently, this study was intended to establish a practical, simple and rapid procedure for the simultaneous determination of individual flavonoids so as to provide technical support for quality appraisal of propolis-rich functional foods. With respect to detection systems employed in HPLC, UV absorbance detection, usually involving a diode array detector (DAD), and coupled MS detection are undoubtedly the two most important ones. HPLC–MS, indeed, represents a very powerful tool for the characterization of the complex propolis composition, but it is quite expensive and not readily available in most local laboratories. Diode array detection, more common and less costly, also plays a key role in confirmation of the analyte identity, as it enables simultaneous acquisition of chromatograms at any wavelength accompanied by the absorption spectrum of each eluted band and verification of separation quality with peak purity analysis. As a result, a routinely manageable HPLC–DAD procedure was proposed in the present study, with chromatographic conditions and method validation as well as sample preparation discussed at length. Concerning flavonoids in propolis of different origins, it is demonstrated that at least 87 molecular species have been identified ( Guo & Zhou, 2000a,b,c; Nan, Guo, Zheng, & Zhou, 2006 ), but most of them are not commercially available. For this reason, 10 flavonoids including flavones (baicalin, luteolin, apigenin and chrysin) and flavonols (rutin, quercitrin, quercetin, kaempferol, isorhamnetin and galangin), which are more commonly seen and/or relatively abundant in propolis-rich functional foods, were selected as markers for qualitative and quantitative determination. 2 Experimental 2.1 Samples The various functional food samples in the form of propolis softgel capsules were acquired from local pharmacies. 2.2 Chemicals and reagents Rutin, quercitrin, baicalin, luteolin, quercetin, kaempferol, isorhamnetin, chrysin and galangin were purchased from the National Institute for the Control of Pharmaceutical and Biological Products (Beijing, China), while apigenin was purchased from Shanghai U-sea Biotech Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The HPLC-grade methanol and acetonitrile both were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (MA, USA), and HPLC-grade tetrahydrofuran was from Chengdu Kelong Chemical Reagent Company (Chengdu, China). Phosphoric acid (analytical grade, ⩾85%) was purchased from Chengdu Chemicals Company (Chengdu, China). All the other commercial reagents were of analytical grade. Water used throughout the experiment was produced by a Synergy 185 Ultrapure Water System (Millipore, MA, USA). 2.3 Chromatographic system Chromatographic analysis was carried out on a high performance liquid chromatograph (Agilent 1100, Agilent Technologies Inc., CA, USA), equipped with a quat pump (G1311A), a degasser (G1322A), a thermostatted column compartment (G1316A), a diode array detector (G1315D), and a ChemStation for LC 3D Systems software (Version B.03.01). The separation was achieved on a Gemini C 18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm, 110 Å, Phenomenex, USA). The binary mobile phase was composed of water with 1% tetrahydrofuran (pH 2.5) (A) and acetonitrile (B). The pH of A was adjusted with phosphoric acid. The HPLC mode was performed by means of linear gradient elution as follows: 20–29% B in 10 min, 29% B for 20 min, 29–100% B in 10 min. Good repeatability was achieved by flushing the column with 100% B for 5 min and then balancing it with the initial mobile phase for 5 min between runs. A 10 μL aliquot of a sample was injected into the HPLC system and the analysis was carried out at 1.2 mL min −1 and at 30 °C. Chromatographic data were acquired within the 210–400 nm range and integrated at 265 nm, and for certain samples, at 360 nm, as described below. 2.4 Standard solutions and calibration All standard solutions were prepared in methanol. Standards of rutin, quercitrin, quercetin, and kaempferol were accurately weighed and dissolved in volumetric flasks to obtain stock solutions of 1 mg mL −1 , respectively, while stock solutions of baicalin, luteolin, apigenin, isorhamnetin, chrysin, and galangin were prepared in the same way with concentrations of 300 μg mL −1 , respectively. These stock solutions were diluted with methanol to prepare a series of mixed working solutions with different concentrations. All the standard solutions were stored at 4 °C in darkness and remained stable for at least one month; the stability was verified by re-assaying the standard solutions. Calibration curves were established based on six levels for each flavonoid in triplicate. 2.5 Preparation of samples The content of softgel capsules was well-mixed. Fifty millilitres of methanol was added to a 1 g aliquot of a sample, and extraction was subsequently performed in an ultrasonic bath for 15 min. The methanol extract was centrifuged (4000× g ) and filtered through a 0.45 μm syringe filter prior to analysis. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Optimization of HPLC conditions 3.1.1 Optimal pH of the mobile phase The p K a values, obtained from the SciFinder Scholar 2007 database, of the studied flavonoids with hydroxyl groups of various numbers and positions generally range from 6 to 7, except for baicalin, which presents a p K a of only 2.72. That means baicalin would act as an anionic particle in slightly acidic media. Therefore, the effect of acidity of the mobile phase on separation was the first factor to be evaluated, with expectations of enhancing the resolution, restraining the ionization, and eliminating the peak tailing of the analytes. The mobile phases composed of water (pH 2.1–3.5) and methanol (or acetonitrile) were tested. The results indicated that, in acetonitrile-based solvents, all compounds except luteolin and quercetin exhibited favourable peak symmetry and resolution under acidic conditions, while the retention time of baicalin fluctuated from 12 to 19 min when the pH values varied from 2.9 to 3.5; this finding could possibly be attributable to a glucopyranuronic acid group in the molecular structure of baicalin. The situation for methanol-based solvents was somewhat alike. With both acid endurance of the C 18 column and the repeatability requirement of retention time taken into account, the pH of the aqueous phase was controlled at 2.5. 3.1.2 Composition of the mobile phase Several mobile phases have been used but the most common are binary systems consisting of an aqueous component and a less polar organic solvent for flavonoid separation ( Gómez-Caravaca et al., 2006 ). Firstly, a mixture of water (pH 2.5) and methanol was tested as the mobile phase. Kaempferol, apigenin and isorhamnetin were difficult to distinguish by either isocratic (40–60% methanol) or gradient elution, and the whole elution was time-consuming. Hence, acetonitrile was substituted for methanol as a test. This time, on one hand, apigenin was eluted ahead of kaempferol and isorhamnetin, thus successful separation occurred; on the other hand, luteolin and quercetin could not be completely dissolved, and, by the way, their eluotropic sequence reversed as compared to that when a methanol-based solvent was used as the mobile phase. According to a previous study ( Wang & Huang, 2004 ), addition of a small amount of tetrahydrofuran (THF) to the mobile phase would give a better resolution to luteolin and quercetin. Therefore, in this work, the influence of the THF concentration on the resolution was investigated under the condition of water (pH 2.5)-acetonitrile (71:29). The results suggested that 1–1.5% THF was suitable ( R s ⩾ 1.50) ( Table 1 ). As there existed just a little luteolin in samples, 1% THF was adequate for separation in the present analysis. In addition, for the sake of avoiding interference with rutin by the system peak and quickening elution of baicalin and galangin, gradient modes were taken during the first and the last 10 minutes, respectively. Compared with methanol, acetonitrile was observed to have the advantages of strong eluting capacity, little UV absorption, low effect of column pressure, and slight baseline drift in the gradient elution. The chromatograms of the mixed standard solution and a sample under the optimal conditions are shown in Fig. 1 . 3.1.3 Optimization of diode array detection Flavones and flavonols contain two aromatic rings in different positions and thus suggest two absorption maxima ( de Rijke et al., 2006 ), which fell within the ranges of 254–277 nm and 312–371 nm for the 10 studied flavonoids respectively, recorded by the DAD detection in this work. As their UV absorption spectra showed, the two maxima of each flavonoid were of similar absorption intensity, except that the second maxima, 316 nm of baicalin and 312 nm of chrysin, were much less than their first maxima of 277 nm and 268 nm, respectively. To ensure high sensitivity for all analytes and to make quantification easier, the detection was monitored at 265 nm. Absorbance was, too, measured at 360 nm so as to eliminate the interference with luteolin and quercetin by unknown matrices of certain samples. Each analyte in the sample was identified by comparing its absorption spectrum and retention time with those of the corresponding standard. 3.2 Preparation of samples According to literature, commercial propolis preparations are usually made from ethanol extracts of propolis (EEP) in many countries ( Volpi & Bergonzini, 2006 ). Ethanol, at concentrations of 70% and 80%, is the most commonly used solvent to obtain dewaxed propolis extracts ( Gómez-Caravaca et al., 2006 ). For propolis products, however, ethanol may not always be the most appropriate extracting solvent. To release flavonoids efficiently from the matrices (edible gelatin, glycerin and plant oil, etc.) of functional food samples, extraction capacities of different solvents, including absolute methanol, ethanol, ethyl acetate, acetonitrile and dichloromethane, were investigated by spiking samples, which were proved to contain no quercitrin or baicalin and a little luteolin through trial determinations, with standards of the three compounds and then carrying out the extraction in an ultrasonic bath. It was found that methanol exhibited the best performance; ethanol showed lower extraction efficiency for the three glycosides (rutin, quercitrin and baicalin), just 63.9–83.5% compared with methanol; ethyl acetate, acetonitrile, and dichloromethane showed unacceptable extraction efficiency for several flavonoids, especially for the glycosides. Taking into account that methanol (ethanol) of other concentrations might extract higher quantities of flavonoids, further studies on 60–90% methanol (ethanol) were conducted. The extraction efficiency for different flavonoids is seen in Fig. 2 . The results indicated that 60% methanol (ethanol) showed high extraction efficiency for glycosides but relatively low extraction efficiency of 71.7% (83.4%) and 64.0% (72.4%) for less polar chrysin and galangin, respectively, and concentrations of 70–90% showed almost the same efficiency as absolute methanol for all analytes. But emulsification developed to a certain extent in aqueous methanol (ethanol) during the sample extraction, probably due to the presence of emulsifier (Tween 80, PEG-40 hydrogenated castor oil, etc.) in samples, and this gave rise to interferences in the HPLC analysis. Accordingly, absolute methanol was chosen as the extracting solvent throughout the experiment. Moreover, duration and cycles of extraction were studied. The results showed that the extraction efficiency could reach above 95% after a single operation of 15 min in an ultrasonic bath. 3.3 Validation of the method 3.3.1 Calibration, limit of detection and limit of quantification Calibration curves were constructed by plotting the peak areas y (mAU min) against the concentrations x (μg mL −1 ) for all analytes. The optimal linear ranges and their correlation coefficients are presented in Table 2 . When the calibration method was applied to simultaneously determine these compounds, appropriate dilution of the sample solution was necessary in some cases to ensure that the analyte concentration was within the corresponding range of the standard calibration set. Limit of detection (LOD) was defined as the analyte concentration for which the signal-to-noise was equal to 3 ( S / N = 3). Limit of quantification (LOQ) was defined as the analyte content for which S / N = 10. As shown in Table 2 , LODs are 0.043–0.232 μg mL −1 , and LOQs are 0.007–0.039 mg g −1 for a 1 g sample extracted with 50 mL of methanol. 3.3.2 Precision and accuracy The intra- and inter-day precisions were estimated by the relative standard deviations (RSDs) of peak areas through replicate injections of standard solutions during one day and one month, respectively. The intra-day precision of 0.67–1.90% ( n = 7) and the inter-day precision of 3.43–4.91% ( n = 7) are given in Table 2 . To evaluate the accuracy of the proposed method, the spiked sample solutions of low, medium, and high concentrations were determined according to the experimental procedure described. The repeatability of the method was also evaluated by analysis of the spiked samples in triplicate. The results of recovery and repeatability tests are shown in Table 3 . 3.4 Application to real sample assays The validated procedure was employed for simultaneous determination of flavonoids in 12 brands of propolis softgel capsules. The results of quantitative analysis are shown in Table 4 . All samples had a characteristic of fairly similar chromatogram profiles that are potentially useful for judging propolis-derived flavonoids, except that sample No.1 which also contained another ingredient of Ginkgo biloba L . leaves exhibited a different profile. Most samples showed high percentages of chrysin and galangin (approximately 32.7–46.1% and 36.1–51.6% of the total identified flavonoids, respectively), apart from samples No.1 and No.8 showing 18.8% and 20.3% (sample No.1), 17.9% and 17.0% (sample No.8) of chrysin and galangin respectively, in good agreement with the previous studies that also proved chrysin and galangin were the prominent flavonoids in propolis ( Gardana et al., 2007; Kumazawa et al., 2004; Pietta et al., 2002; Zhou et al., 2008 ). In addition, according to the Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China (2005), the contents of chrysin and galangin were, too, adopted as indicators to evaluate the quality of raw propolis. 4 Conclusions Although a large number of studies on raw propolis, its chemical composition and biological properties, have been carried out over the past several decades, very few studies focus on the assay of principal components, such as flavonoids, of propolis products. In this work, a HPLC–DAD method was developed for the simultaneous determination of 10 common flavonoids in propolis-rich functional foods. Chromatographic conditions, i.e. the pH value, the THF concentration, the programmed gradient elution and the detection wavelength, were optimized carefully, and thus favourable peak symmetry and resolution were achieved within 40 min. The analysis time was much shorter and the elution was even simpler than those of some previous studies. The preparation of commercial samples that possessed different matrices from the raw propolis was also investigated in detail. Absolute methanol exhibited the best performance in an ultrasonic bath for 15 min. The proposed method was successfully applied to the qualitative and quantitative assay of 12 brands of real samples. It proved rapid, simple and routinely manageable, and would provide technical support for quality appraisal and pharmacological and clinical research. Acknowledgements This work was supported financially by a grant-in-aid from the Ministry of Sciences and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (No. 2006BAD27B02 ). Appendix A Supplementary data Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.01.006 . Appendix A Supplementary data Supplementary Figure 1 The structures of the studied flavones (a) and flavonols (b). Supplementary Figure 2 Absorption spectra of flavones (a) and flavonols (b) at 210–400 nm wavelengths. References Alencar et al., 2007 S.M. Alencar T.L.C. Oldoni M.L. Castro I.S.R. Cabral C.M. Costa-Neto J.A. Cury Chemical composition and biological activity of a new type of Brazilian propolis: Red propolis Journal of Ethnopharmacology 113 2 2007 278 283 Banskota et al., 2001 A.H. Banskota Y. Tezuka S. Kadota Recent progress in pharmacological research of propolis Phytotherapy Research 15 7 2001 561 571 Beecher, 2003 G.R. Beecher Overview of dietary flavonoids: nomenclature, occurrence and intake Journal of Nutrition 133 10 2003 3248S 3254S Burdock, 1998 G.A. Burdock Review of the biological properties and toxicity of bee propolis (propolis) Food and Chemical Toxicology 36 4 1998 347 363 Cao et al., 2004 Y.H. Cao Y. Wang Q. Yuan Analysis of flavonoids and phenolic acid in propolis by capillary electrophoresis Chromatographia 59 1–2 2004 135 140 Castaldo and Capasso, 2002 S. Castaldo F. Capasso Propolis, an old remedy used in modern medicine Fitoterapia 73 Suppl. 1 2002 S1 S6 de Funari et al., 2007 C.S. de Funari V. de Oliveira Ferro M.B. Mathor Analysis of propolis from Baccharis dracunculifolia DC. (Compositae) and its effects on mouse fibroblasts Journal of Ethnopharmacology 111 2 2007 206 212 de Rijke et al., 2006 E. de Rijke P. Out W.M.A. Niessen F. Ariese C. Gooijer U.A.T. Brinkman Analytical separation and detection methods for flavonoids Journal of Chromatography 1112 1–2 2006 31 63 de Vecchi and Drago, 2007 E. de Vecchi L. Drago Propolis antimicrobial activity: What’s new? Le Infezioni in Medicina 15 1 2007 7 15 Fernández et al., 2008 M.C. Fernández O. Cuesta-Rubio A.R. Perez R.M. de Oca Porto M.I. Hernández A.L. Piccinelli GC–MS determination of isoflavonoids in seven red Cuban propolis samples Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56 21 2008 9927 9932 Fu et al., 2005 S.H. Fu M.H. Yang H.M. Wen J.C. Chern Analysis of flavonoids in propolis by capillary electrophoresis Journal of Food and Drug Analysis 13 1 2005 43 50 Gómez-Caravaca et al., 2006 A.M. Gómez-Caravaca M. Gómez-Romero D. Arráez-Román A. Segura-Carretero A. Fernández-Gutiérrez Advances in the analysis of phenolic compounds in products derived from bees Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 41 4 2006 1220 1234 Gardana et al., 2007 C. Gardana M. Scaglianti P. Pietta P. Simonetti Analysis of the polyphenolic fraction of propolis from different sources by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 45 3 2007 390 399 Guo and Zhou, 2000 J. Guo L.D. Zhou Advances in studies on chemical constituents of propolis Apiculture of China 51 02 2000 17 18 Guo and Zhou, 2000b Guo, J., & Zhou, L. D. (2000b). Advances in studies on chemical constituents of propolis. Apiculture of China , 51 (03), 21–22, 32. Guo and Zhou, 2000c J. Guo L.D. Zhou Advances in studies on chemical constituents of propolis Apiculture of China 51 04 2000 18 20 Jiang et al., 2008 L.Q. Jiang G.Z. Fang Y. Zhang G.J. Cao S. Wang Analysis of flavonoids in propolis and Ginkgo biloba by micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56 24 2008 11571 11577 Kalogeropoulos et al., 2009 N. Kalogeropoulos S.J. Konteles E. Troullidou I. Mourtzinos V.T. Karathanos Chemical composition, antioxidant activity and antimicrobial properties of propolis extracts from Greece and Cyprus Food Chemistry 116 2 2009 452 461 Kumazawa et al., 2004 S. Kumazawa T. Hamasaka T. Nakayama Antioxidant activity of propolis of various geographic origins Food Chemistry 84 3 2004 329 339 Kumazawa et al., 2003 S. Kumazawa M. Yoneda I. Shibata J. Kanaeda T. Hamasaka T. Nakayama Direct evidence for the plant origin of Brazilian propolis by the observation of honeybee behavior and phytochemical analysis Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin 51 6 2003 740 742 Lima et al., 2009 B. Lima A. Tapia L. Luna M.P. Fabani G. Schmeda-Hirschmann N.S. Podio D.A. Wunderlin G.E. Feresin Main flavonoids, DPPH activity, and metal content allow determination of the geographical origin of propolis from the province of San Juan (Argentina) Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 57 7 2009 2691 2698 Medana et al., 2008 C. Medana F. Carbone R. Aigotti G. Appendino C. Baiocchi Selective analysis of phenolic compounds in propolis by HPLC–MS/MS Phytochemical Analysis 19 1 2008 32 39 Nan et al., 2006 Nan, Y., Guo, J., Zheng, L. X., & Zhou, L. D. (2006). Advances in studies on chemical constituents of propolis. World Science and Technology-Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Materia Medica , 8 (1), 56, 61–71. Park et al., 2002 Y.K. Park S.M. Alencar C.L. Aguiar Botanical origin and chemical composition of Brazilian propolis Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50 9 2002 2502 2506 Park et al., 1998 Y.K. Park M.H. Koo J.A.S. Abreu M. Ikegaki J.A. Cury P.L. Rosalen Antimicrobial activity of propolis on oral microorganisms Current Microbiology 36 1 1998 24 28 Pietta et al., 2002 P.G. Pietta C. Gardana A.M. Pietta Analytical methods for quality control of propolis Fitoterapia 73 Suppl. 1 2002 S7 S20 Stobiecki, 2000 M. Stobiecki Application of mass spectrometry for identification and structural studies of flavonoid glycosides Phytochemistry 54 3 2000 237 256 Volpi and Bergonzini, 2006 N. Volpi G. Bergonzini Analysis of flavonoids from propolis by on-line HPLC–electrospray mass spectrometry Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 42 3 2006 354 361 Wang and Huang, 2004 S.P. Wang K.J. Huang Determination of flavonoids by high-performance liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis Journal of Chromatography A 1032 1–2 2004 273 279 Zhou et al., 2008 J. Zhou Y. Li J. Zhao X. Xue L. Wu F. Chen Geographical traceability of propolis by high-performance liquid-chromatography fingerprints Food Chemistry 108 2 2008 749 759