Abstract:Current sensing methods often ignore the fact that their sensing targets are dynamic and can change over time. As a result, to build an accurate model should not always be of the first priority. What we need is to establish an adaptive modelling framework. Lack of this adaptability hinders us from building a more intelligent sensing system. In this paper, we try to apply inspirations from human cognition to design a more intelligent sensing and modelling system, which can adaptively detect anomalies. Based on our understanding of free-energy and Infomax principle, the target of sensing and modelling is not to get as much data as possible, or to build the most accurate model, but to establish an adaptive representation of target and achieve balance between sensing performance and system resource consumption. Formally speaking, from the perspective of free energy minimization, this corresponds to a balance between accuracy and the minimization of complexity costs. To achieve this goal, we adopt a working memory mechanism to help the model evolve with the target; we use deep autoencoder network as model representation, which models complex data with its nonlinear and hierarchical architecture. Since we typically only have partial observations from sensed target, we design a variance of autoencoder that can reconstruct corrupted input. We utilize attentional surprise mechanism to control model update. Training of the deep network is driven by surprises detected (anomalies), which indicates model failure or target's new behaviour. Due to partial observations, we are not able to minimize free-energy in a single update, but iteratively minimize it by finding new optimization bounds. While both random and non-random sensor selection can create new optimization bounds, non-random methods like surprise minimization used in this paper demonstrate better performance. In our system, the model update frequency is controlled by several parameters, including surprise threshold and memory size. These parameters control the alertness as well as the resource consumption of the system in a top-down manner. For evaluation, we conducted experiments on simulated data to test whether our methodology makes the model more adaptive. The result showed that we achieved this aim. We also applied our method to a real application, which is EEG (Electroencephalography) seizure detection. This application shows features that we desired.

Visualizing Anomalies in Sensor Networks.

SAVE: Sensor anomaly visualization engine

Cognitive Sensing: Adaptive Anomalies Detection with Deep Networks

SensorAware: Visual Analysis of Both Static and Mobile Sensor Information

A Survey of Network Anomaly Visualization

Enhancing Visibility of Network Performance in Large-Scale Sensor Networks

Visual Analytics of the Spatio-temporal Multidimensional Air Monitoring Data

Distributed Online One-Class Support Vector Machine for Anomaly Detection over Networks

Distributed and explainable GHSOM for anomaly detection in sensor networks

Learning the Dynamics for Anomaly Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks.

An Interactive Visual Analytics Approach for Network Anomaly Detection Through Smart Labeling

Self-Supervised Variational Graph Autoencoder for System-Level Anomaly Detection

Self-Diagnosis for Detecting System Failures in Large-Scale Wireless Sensor Networks.

STAD-HD : Spatial Temporal Anomaly Detection for Heterogeneous Data through Visual Analytics

An Unsupervised Spatiotemporal Graphical Modeling Approach to Anomaly Detection in Distributed CPS

Mining and Visualising Wireless Sensor Network Data.

Visualization-based monitoring in early warning systems with wireless sensor networks

Enhancing anomaly detection with adaptive node inspection in large-scale networks with binary sensors

A real-time network security visualization system based on incremental learning (ChinaVis 2018)

A task of anomaly detection for a smart satellite Internet of things system

Does Feature Matter: Anomaly Detection in Sensor Networks