Abstract:Youyou Tu won the Nobel Prize, yet she failed to be nominated for China's own State Science and Technology (S&T) Awards. This has triggered a fierce debate on the S&T Award evaluation system in China. S&T awards are determined by bureaucrats and social circles (“guanxi”) ([ 1 ][1]). Because the system lacks transparency and allows no input from citizens or scientists, it is prone to opaque operations and influence by cronyism, favoritism, and bureaucracy. This has contaminated the science culture in China. Scientists feel obligated to develop “guanxi” networks instead of focusing on scientific discovery. A large portion of the country's science budget was estimated to have been wasted on networking dinners instead of invested in research labs ([ 1 ][1], [ 2 ][2]). Such priorities lead to scientific corruption and fraud ([ 3 ][3]). If nothing changes, talented scientists and scientific breakthroughs will continue to be suppressed. It is time for China to reform its S&T evaluation system. It should depend on merit, transparency, peer reviews, and objective measures. True participation by the science community should be institutionalized. The government should detach itself from the process. Decision-makers should consult with international academic circles and nongovernmental organizations. This new system is feasible with the availability of the Internet and social media. Making these changes will set an example for other countries that suffer from issues similar to China's. 1. [↵][4]1. Y. G. Shi, 2. Y. Rao , Science 329, 1128 (2010). [OpenUrl][5][Abstract/FREE Full Text][6] 2. [↵][7]1. Y. Xie, 2. C. Zhang, 3. Q. Lai , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 9437 (2014). [OpenUrl][8][Abstract/FREE Full Text][9] 3. [↵][10]1. C. Cao, 2. N. Li, 3. X. Li, 4. L. Liu , Science 341, 460 (2013). [OpenUrl][11][Abstract/FREE Full Text][12] [1]: #ref-1 [2]: #ref-2 [3]: #ref-3 [4]: #xref-ref-1-1 "View reference 1 in text" [5]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DScience%26rft.stitle%253DScience%26rft.aulast%253DShi%26rft.auinit1%253DY.%26rft.volume%253D329%26rft.issue%253D5996%26rft.spage%253D1128%26rft.epage%253D1128%26rft.atitle%253DChina%2527s%2BResearch%2BCulture%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1126%252Fscience.1196916%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F20813923%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [6]: /lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6Mzoic2NpIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEzOiIzMjkvNTk5Ni8xMTI4IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjU6Ii9zY2kvMzUxLzYyNzgvMTE2MS4xLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ== [7]: #xref-ref-2-1 "View reference 2 in text" [8]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DProc.%2BNatl.%2BAcad.%2BSci.%2BU.S.A.%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1073%252Fpnas.1407709111%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F24979796%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [9]: /lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoicG5hcyI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMToiMTExLzI2Lzk0MzciO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyNToiL3NjaS8zNTEvNjI3OC8xMTYxLjEuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9 [10]: #xref-ref-3-1 "View reference 3 in text" [11]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DScience%26rft.stitle%253DScience%26rft.aulast%253DCao%26rft.auinit1%253DC.%26rft.volume%253D341%26rft.issue%253D6145%26rft.spage%253D460%26rft.epage%253D462%26rft.atitle%253DReforming%2BChina%2527s%2BS%2526T%2BSystem%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1126%252Fscience.1234206%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F23908209%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [12]: /lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6Mzoic2NpIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEyOiIzNDEvNjE0NS80NjAiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyNToiL3NjaS8zNTEvNjI3OC8xMTYxLjEuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9

The Cause and Effect of the Research Misconduct in ＂Bubble Fusion＂

Research misconduct: definitions, manifestations and extent

Research Misconduct Investigations in China's Science Funding System

Causes and countermeasures of research-integrity problems in the new era: From the perspective of the culture of science

The Reflect on Scientific Fraud

Editorial reflections about two cases of academic misconduct

A retrospective analysis based on the investigation and handling results of 310 medical research integrity cases

Research Misconduct in Business and Management Studies: Causes, Consequences, and Possible Remedies

Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case

[Scientific misconduct: A major threat for medical research]

Productivity Patterns, Collaboration and Scientific Careers of Authors with Retracted Publications in Clinical Medicine

On the Negative Impacts Resulting from Disputes over Science Discovery Priority

Reforming China's Science Awards.

Disclosing the Misconduct in Chiang and Yang's 'A Bibliometric Study of Financial Risk Literature: A Historic Approach'

[Research Misconduct in Japan and How It Is Covered by the Media]

Who should be held accountable? An analysis of academic misconduct cases in Chinese higher education and the challenges of the transformative process

The Replication Crisis in Psychological Research:The Solution of It

Research misconduct as a challenge for academic institutions and scientific journals

Research Misconduct in the Age of Open Science: The Case of STAP Stem Cells

Rooting out scientific misconduct

Finding the truth in science