Abstract:In his discussion on action, Searle combines intentionality with action closely, pointing out that intentionality causes action and action satisfies intentionality. To analyze the structure of action, he differentiates prior intention from action (including intention-in-action and bodily movement). Prior intention refers to action and the whole action is its intentional object. But intention-in-action only refers to bodily movement. Despite this difference, prior intention and intention-in-action are causally selfreferential. The claim that intentions are causally self-referential means that it is part of the content of a prior intention that it causes the corresponding action by producing a representation of its own conditions of satisfaction. Similarly, it is part of the content of an intention-in-action that it causes a body movement by producing a presentation of its own conditions of satisfaction. With these, prior intention causes intention-in-action which in turn causes body movement. Conversely, body movement satisfies intention-in-action which in turn satisfies prior intention. It is mental causation that shapes the relationship between intentionality and action. It is noted that the logical form of the explanation of human behavior in terms of mental causation is radically different from the standard forms of causation. That is to say that mental causation isn’t sufficient and cannot determine action. An essential feature of mental causation is that the mental state itself functions causally in the production of its own conditions of satisfaction or its conditions of satisfaction function causally in its production. Because of these, we should postulate an irreducible Non-human Self. Besides body and experience which Hume attributed to the self, the Non-human Self contains a conscious agent.Searle’s philosophy of action, in our analysis, demonstrates a Kantian question: how is voluntary action possible? It includes three sub-class questions: What is the relationship between intentionality and action? Why does the relationship exist in them? What does the relationship depend on? Searle gives us his own answers: intentionality causes action and it is satisfied by action; the relationship results from mental causation; the relationship must depend on a Non-human Self. The method of this survey avoids the defects of introspectionism and behaviorism, prompting the discussion of action.

The Intentional Structure of Collective Action

Intention regulates conflicting desires in human decision making

Intentional commitment as a spontaneous presentation of self

Searle:A Critical Examination

How Could Collectivity Possible?——Review of Gilberts Plural Subject Theory

Action, Causation and Self: Some Remarks on Searle’s Philosophy of Action

EFFICIENCY OF COLLECTIVE ACTIONS UNDER THE VISION OF PUBLIC CHOICE AND ITS INSTITUTIONAL CONNOTATION

Origins of Intentionality: Identity, Self-creativity and Meaning

Conversation,Mind,and Reality:The Three Dimensions of Searle's Speech Act Theory

Intention Beyond Desire: Spontaneous Intentional Commitment Regulates Conflicting Desires.

Intention Beyond Desire: Humans Spontaneously Commit to Future Actions.

Collective action control: Ubiquitous processes and cultural differences

Varieties of collective action: a multidimensional and paradigmatic methodology for their study

The Reasons that Agents Act: Intention and Instrumental Goals

Integrating Individual Preferences into Collective Argumentation

Zhuangzi and collaboration in animals: a critical conceptual analysis of shared intentionality

On Computational Mechanisms for Shared Intentionality, and Speculation on Rationality and Consciousness

Communicative Acts: Intentionality, Contextuality and Reciprocity

Intention as Hierarchical Constraints in Human Planning

Speech Acts, Criteria and Intentions

The Computational Structure of Unintentional Meaning