Retrospective clinical study on 48 cases with severe traumatic lacrimal passage deformation

TAO Hai,WU Hai-Yang,HOU Shi-Ke,WANG Peng,HAN Cui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2010.01.020
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the feasihility,efficacy and safety of autogeneic great saphenous vein or labial mucosa transplantation and reconstruction of lacrimal lake-nasal lacrimal passage for patients with severe traumatic lacrimal passage deformation.Methods Retrospective analysis was taken on causes of injury,concomitant injury of 48 patients(48 eyes) with severe traumatic lacrimal passage deformation. According to the style of operation,patients were divided into 4 groups: patients were treated with reconstruction of lacrimal passage and autogeneic great saphenous vein transplantation via endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy in group A(5 cases,5 eyes),patients underwent construction of lacrimal passage and labial mucosa transplantation via endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy in group B(6 cases,6 eyes),patients underwent construction of lacrimal passage and autogeneic great saphenous vein transplantation via skin in group C(17 cases,17 eyes),and patients underwent construction of lacrimal passage and labial mucosa transplantation via skin in group D(20 cases,20 eyes).A silicone tube (diameter was 2.5 mm) was intubated into each reconstructed lacrimal passage,and removed 3 months later. The following up period was 3 months to 10 months (averaged in 5 months). The drainability of reconstructed lacrimal passage and the alleveliation of epiphora were evaluated,the advantages and disadvantages of different operation were analyzed and summaried.Results In 48 patients (48 eyes) with severe traumatic lacrimal passage deformation,28 cases(58.33%) were injuried in traffic accident,37 cases(77.08%) were concomitanted with traumatic deformation of eyelids and inner canthus. Epiphora of patients in 4 groups were alleveliated in various degrees during the period with silicone tube at postoperative 3 months. The drainability of lacrimal passage was improved for patients in 4 groups at 1 week after removing the tube. There were 1 case in group B,1 case in group C and 2 cases in group D with obstruction of lacrimal passage at 12 weeks after removing the tube. At the 12th week after removing silicone tube,radioactive 99mm TcO4-scintigraphy showed that eye-nose time were (8.4±5.2)minutes,(9.0±5.9)minutes,(6.6±5.2)minutes,(6.9±5.6)minutes in group A,B,C,D,respectively,the eye-nose time of group C was the shortest,the eye-nose time of group B was the longest,and there was significant difference(P<0.05). The primarily results showed 5 cases were cured or meliorated in group A and group B,15 cases and 18 cases were cured or meliorated in group C and group D,respectively.Conclusion Reconstruction of lacrimal-lake-nasal lacrimal passage and autogenetic great saphenous vein or labial mucosa transplantation is practical,effective and safe for patients with severe traumatic lacrimal passage deformation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?