Size characteristics and ageing of the environmental tobacco smoke

Lidia Morawska,Milan Jamriska,Neville D. Bofinger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(96)05388-0
1997-01-01
Abstract:The work presented here is a study of the behaviour of the particulate phase of ETS under controlled laboratory conditions and in real indoor environments with the aim of providing information for assessment of human exposure to ETS. This paper reports investigations of the size distribution of ETS and changes to the distribution with time under a range of environmental conditions. Measurements were performed using two instruments, the Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer and the Aerodynamic Particle Sizer, which enabled the determination of the precise locations of ETS peaks at frequent short time intervals. While total particle concentrations or changes in concentrations are not specific markers of ETS, peaks related to ETS in the spectral distribution of atmospheric particles, for a properly designed experiment, are. The presence and locations of these peaks are characteristic of ETS in indoor environments and are clearly distinguishable from the background particle distribution. It is demonstrated that an initial ETS size distribution in an indoor environment about 10 min after generation by a human smoker has a major peak in the submicron range between 60 and 90 nm. The location of the peak does not depend on the relative humidity, but does depend on the way the cigarette is smoked. An increase in particle size in the range of 20 to 50%, takes place in the first 30 to 60 min after ETS generation and then remains unchanged for the duration of the experiment. A decrease in particle size (shrinkage), was not observed during these experiments. Particle shrinkage has been reported in the literature. Both the SS and the MS smoke reveal bimodal size distribution. In both cases the most significant, in terms of particle numbers, is the submicron peak. Natural ventilation, which is the most common type of ventilation for residences, is often not sufficient for effectively reducing human exposure to ETS. Controlled chamber experiments are useful for investigations of general trends in ETS size distribution and concentration and the results from such experiments, in most cases, correlate well with those from real indoor measurements. There are however, aspects which show certain differences between the two types of experiments. These differences indicate that chamber experiments can not fully simulate indoor measurements, and results from such experiments should be treated with caution when applied to exposure assessment. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?