Introduction to the A&WMA 2003 Critical Review Separation and Capture of CO 2 from Large Stationary Sources and Sequestration in Geological Formations

Judith C. Chow

2003-01-01

Abstract:G lobal warming caused by increas- ing amounts of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the atmosphere is one of the major air quality con- cerns for the 21st century. Carbon dioxide (CO2 )i s re- sponsible for most changes in the Earth's radiation bal- ance, and it is the most abundant GHG emitted by fossil-fuel combustion for power generation, transportation, and heating. CO2 also arises from many industrial processes, such as cement production, and it is often released during gas extraction. CO2 is a useful product for many industrial processes. It is injected into oil wells to prolong and increase their pro- ductivity. When injected into unmineable coalbeds, CO2 displaces methane that can be used as natural gas, a fuel that creates less CO2 per unit of energy provided than other fossil fuels. Reducing worldwide emissions of CO2 will require many mitigation measures, including reductions in en- ergy consumption, more efficient use of available energy, renewable energy sources, and sequestration. Biological sequestration most often intends to create long-lived bio- mass in the form of forests. These measures reach equilib- rium in 100 years as old trees die and decay, thereby rereleasing into the atmosphere the carbon that they had originally sequestered. A longer-term alternative is the injection of CO2 deep into the ecosphere, where it might remain for millions of years. The Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)1 observed that "the use of coal or biomass as a source of hydrogen with storage of the waste CO2 repre- sents a possible step to the hydrogen economy." How- ever, IPCC also warned that "long-term storage is still in the process of being demonstrated" and that research is needed to "determine any adverse and/or beneficial envi- ronmental impacts and public health risks of an uncon- trolled release of the various storage options." The feasi- bility and practicality of geological sequestration is the subject of the Critical Review by Dr. Curt White and his colleagues. White et al. argue that long-term goals for CO2 emis- sions reductions cannot be met without expanding the use of geological sequestration. They break the process into several steps, including removal of CO2 from the effluent stream, concentration into a transportable form, transport to underground coal seams or saline aquifers, injection into the storage medium, and monitoring of CO2 leakage to evaluate overall efficiency. They note the complications of different types of effluent streams that contain both high and moderate levels of CO2, as well as other contaminants that interfere with the removal pro- cess. They describe and evaluate different removal pro- cesses and their non-climate-related environmental con- sequences. The chemical and physical mechanisms by which CO2 migrates through underground storage media and the potential for CO2 to re-escape into the environ- ment are analyzed. Several synergistic opportunities, in which the CO2 waste gas is used to produce valuable products, are identified. Examples from pilot-scale appli- cations in different parts of the world are described, as are U.S. and worldwide resources for deep CO2 storage.