Cell Recognition and Entry by Rhino- and Enteroviruses.
Michael G. Rossmann,Jordi Bella,Prasanna R. Kolatkar,Yongning He,Eckard Wimmer,Richard Kühn,Timothy S. Baker
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.2000.0258
IF: 3.513
2000-01-01
Virology
Abstract:Unlike plant viruses, most mammalian, insect, and bacterial viruses attach to specific cellular receptors that, in part, determine host range and tissue tropism. Viruses have evolved to utilize a wide variety of cellsurface molecules as their receptors, which include proteins, carbohydrates, and glycolipids. Some viruses recognize very specific molecules, such as the intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1; CD54), the receptor recognized by a large group of rhinoviruses, whereas other viruses recognize widely distributed chemical groups, such as sialic acid moieties by influenza viruses. The tissue distribution of the receptor, in part, determines virus tropism and, hence, the symptoms of the infection. Similarly, species differences between receptor molecules can limit host range. For instance, only humans and apes are susceptible to rhinovirus infections, a property correlated with the inability of human rhinoviruses (HRVs) to bind to the receptor ICAM-1 molecule in other species. Despite extensive similarities in sequence, structure, and physical properties among picornaviruses, suggesting evolution from a common ancestor (Rossmann et al., 1985; Palmenberg, 1989; Rueckert, 1990), they nevertheless recognize a variety of receptors. Possibly a primordial virus was able to bind weakly to a large number of different molecules. Subsequently, different viruses evolved that were progressively more efficient at recognizing particular molecules as a means to infect specific cells. Indeed, the grouping of picornaviruses might sug-