Diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma subtype and nuclear grade on percutaneous biopsy

WU Xiang,LI Tao,GAO Xiang-xun,LI Xue-song
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2012.15.007
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective In some cases of uncertain lesions in the kidney,it would be helpful to perform biopsies for preoperative histopathological evaluation.In this study we aim to assess the accuracy of renal biopsy for predicting the tumor histologic subtype and nuclear grade.Methods A total of 68 patients(48 males,20 females)underwent biopsy with ultrasound guidance using percutaneous 18-gauge biopsy cores between March 2006 and Dec 2011.All patients subsequently underwent partial nephrectomy,radical nephrectomy or palliative nephrectomy.Preoperative biopsy results were compared with postoperative specimens.Results The mean tumor size was 5.3 cm(range,2.5-10.2 cm).Overall,biopsy correctly identified 62 of 68(91.2%)histologic subtypes including 53 of 56(94.6%)clear cell renal carcinomas,10 of 11(90.9%)papillary carcinomas,0 of 2(0)chromophobe carcinomas,and 1 of 1(100%)inflammatory pseudo-tumor.1 non-diagnostic biopsy was finally proved to be chromophobe carcinomas.Nuclear grade of the biopsy and the final specimen were both evaluated for 60 of 68 patients.Nuclear grade was accurately assigned for 31 of 60(51.7%)conclusive biopsies,underestimated for 29(46.7%).In 6 of 60(10%)cases,the biopsy nuclear grade increased by 2 when compared with the final grade.Tumor size had no statistically significant influence on biopsy accuracy.Overall,the mean tumor size was 5.3 cm while the mean tumor size in patients where the biopsy correctly defined the final grade was 3.9 cm(P=0.059).For tumors≤4 cm,the accuracy of biopsy was 63.9%(23/36).While for tumors>4 cm,the accuracy was only 33.3%(8/24)(P=0.051).Conclusions Percutaneous renal biopsy can accurately define renal cell carcinoma histologic subtype.However it seens to underestimate nuclear grade in most cases.Although tumor size had no statistically significant influence on biopsy accuracy,but it seem to influence these results when more patients were enrolled.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?