Abstract:The Internet has been witnessing the success of Peer-toPeer (P2P) live streaming during the past three years. A number of commercial P2P streaming software has emerged on Internet (such as PPLive to name a few). Almost all these P2P streaming systems are based on pull-based (or called “data-driven”/“swarming”) protocol [4, 2]. In this type of protocol, the live media content is divided into segments and every node periodically notifies its neighbors of what packets it has. Then each node explicitly requests the segments of interest from its neighbors according to their notification. This protocol is very similar to that of BitTorrent, and the major difference from BitTorrent is that each node only requests the latest generated segments in a much smaller window (called request window). The well-acknowledged advantages of pullbased protocol are its robustness and simplicity. However, we would like to report a graceful characteristic of pull-based protocol that has not been paid enough attention: with appropriate protocol design and parameter settings, the simplest pull-based protocol without any intelligent scheduling and bandwidth measurement is nearly optimal in bandwidth utilization and system throughput, that is, as long as the total upload capacity supply is a little higher than the minimum bandwidth demand, all the peers can obtain nearly 100% playback quality. On the other hand, the most outstanding drawback of pull-based streaming is its tradeoff between control overhead and delay [3]: to minimize the delay, each node notifies its neighbors of packet arrivals as soon as it receives the packet and the neighbor should request the packet immediately after receiving the notification, resulting in a remarkable control overhead; while, to diminish the overhead, a node can wait until dozens of packets arrived and inform these packets to its neighbors once in a packet meanwhile the neighbors can also request a bunch of packets once, which obviously leads to a considerable delay. An interesting question is whether there exists any protocol that can not only hold the near optimality in upload capacity utilization but also achieve both much lower delay and smaller overhead. Fortunately, a simple protocol called hybrid pull-push protocol we proposed has all these features.

Data Receiving Quality based Adaptive Pull Push Scheduling Algorithm for P2P Streaming System

A Distributed P2P Ordering System Accepting Mass Real-Time Broadcasting

An Efficient Data Scheduling Algorithm for Peer-to-Peer Streaming System

Efficient Request Allocation Algorithm for Peer-to-Peer Streaming System

Step Based Data Scheduling Algorithm for P2P Streaming System

Data Scheduling Based on Node Service-Capacity in P2P VoD System

Modeling and Performance Analysis of Pull-Based Live Streaming Schemes in Peer-to-Peer Network

Data accumulation based adaptive data scheduling algorithm for P2P media streaming

Optimal Data Scheduling for P2P VoD Streaming Systems

Understanding the Power of Pull-based P2P Live Streaming and Doing Even Better

On Reducing Delay in Mesh-Based P2P Streaming: A Mesh-Push Approach.

Understanding the Power of Pull Based P2P Live Streaming and Doing Even Better

A Research on Modeling Feedback-Based Data Scheduling in P2P Streaming System

Context-aware Adaptive Data Scheduling Algorithm for P2P Streaming Systems

Adaptive-Push Peer-to-Peer Video Streaming System Based on Dynamic Unstructured Topology

Optimizing Push Scheduling Algorithm Based on Network Coding for Mesh Peer-to-Peer Live Streaming

Optimal Data Scheduling for P2p Video-On-Demand Streaming Systems

Adaptive Resource Management for P2P Live Streaming Systems

GPSA： A Greedy Pull-based Scheduling Approach for P2P Live Streaming under Heterogeneous Environments

P2:A Pull-Push Data Distribution Algorithm in VoD Systems

Understanding the Power of Pull-Based Streaming Protocol: Can We Do Better?