Abstract:Working memory capacity and sentence processing are closely related. The capacity-constrained theory argues that there is a general verbal working memory system that supports language processing. Alternatively, the separate processing resources theory states that there are two kinds of working memory systems that support the on-line and off-line language processing separately. The capacity of working memory measured by the Daneman and Carpenter Reading Span Test (1980) only influences off-line language processing. This study presents an eye-tracking experiment that investigated whether the working memory capacity of adult learners of English as a second language had an effect on the on-line and off-line processing of English sentences. The sentences contained verbs that were temporarily ambiguous between a main verb and a reduced relative clause. Participants were 31 Chinese-English bilinguals who are less proficient English readers. The reading span test of Daneman and Carpenter (1980) was used to differentiate high-span and low-span readers. The first-pass fixation duration of reading different regions of sentences was used as the index of on-line processing; whereas the regression numbers and total fixation times were used as the index of off-line processing. Results showed that the first-pass durations were significantly different on ambiguous and disambiguated regions between high and low working memory capacity readers; the regression patterns from disambiguated regions to ambiguous regions and to subject noun phrase regions between high and low working memory capacity readers were similar; the total fixation times were significantly different on the ambiguous and disambiguated regions between high and low working memory capacity readers. These results suggest that different working memory capacity affects the on-line as well as the off-line syntactic processing of syntactically ambiguous English sentences for less proficient second language readers. Furthermore, these results support the capacity-constrained theory of working memory.

Argument on the domain generality of working memory capacity

Is Working Memory Necessary for Both Selection and Calculation in Level 1 Visual Perspective Taking? Evidence from Children and Adults

Whether Verbal and Visuospatial Working Memory Play Different Roles in Pupil’s Mathematical Abilities

Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity Are Reflected in Different ERP and EEG Patterns to Task Difficulty

Working Memory Asymmetrically Modulates Auditory and Linguistic Processing of Speech.

Interactions between Selective Attention and Visuospatial Working Memory

Unitary or non-unitary nature of working memory? Evidence from its relation to general fluid and crystallized intelligence

Visual Working-Memory Capacity Load Does Not Modulate Distractor Processing

Influence of Working Memory Capacity on Processing English Temporary Syntactic Ambiguity Sentences for Chinese-English Bilinguals

Working Memory Capacity Influences on the Use of Verb Bias Information during Second Language Sentence Reading

Feature versus object in interpreting working memory capacity

An Exploration of Individual Difference Theories of Working Memory

Recent Development in the Study of the Relationship Between General Intelligence and Working Memory

A Domain-General Frontoparietal Network Interacts with Domain-Preferential Intermediate Pathways to Support Working Memory Task.

Why is Working Memory Related to Intelligence? Different Contributions from Storage and Processing.

Working memory capacity and the scope and control of attention

Effects of information type,encoding modality and encoding language on working memory span:Evidence for the hierarchical view

A meta-analysis on the relation between reading and working memory.

A study on spatio-temporal patterns of ERP of individual differences of visual working memory capacity

Modality specificity in the cerebro-cerebellar neurocircuitry during working memory

Verbal and Spatial Working Memory:A fMRI Study