QUALITY ANALYSIS OF 303 PAPERS ON CLINIC TREATMENT EFFECT ON CERVICAL LESION

LI Jing-ran,WEI Li-hui
2009-01-01
Abstract:[Objective]To evaluate the quality of papers about clinical effect on the treatment of cervical lesion from 1997 to 2008. [Methods] Collected 303 papers about clinical effect observation of the cervical lesion from medical science periodicals between June 1997 and June 2008, through the number of cases, the research designs, the methods, the curative standard, follow-up results etc to evaluate the quality of papers. [Results] There were 303 articles about clinical curative effect of the cervical lesion, including 277 articles with descriptive study in experiment design, 19 with randomized controlled study, 7 with controlled but without randomized study .The number of related papers climbed steadily, reaching the peak in 2007. 133 and 182 papers were belong to provincial and municipality hospitals respectively. The papers using the curative effect standard were 290 (95.7%), in which 114 had clear standard (37.6%). The majority treatment method was LEEP (67.7%). Curative rate scope was between 89.3%-100%, average 93.5%. The curative rate of cervicitis was highest (93.4%-98.8%); the curative rate of cervical condyloma was lowest (66.7%-87.5%), the Curative rate of CIN was 84.4%-96.3%. The follow-up time were 3-30 mouths, there was 232 (76.6%) in the six mouths. Bleeding was the most common complication, the occurrence rate was 1.1%-13.3%. [Conclusion] The judgment standard of the cervical lesion effect on medical treatment is consistent, the curative rate is higher. The main method is LEEP, but widespread problems are that follow-up time and randomized are not enough.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?