The dose titration efficacy studies of methylphenidate hydrochloride controlled-release tablets in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with conduct disorder in children.

XIAO Hua,YANG Si-yuan,MAI Jian-ning,DU Zhi-hong,MAO Li-jia
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study the methylphenidate hydrochloride controlled-release tablets ( OROS-MPH ) dose titration treatment for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) combining conduct disorder ( CD ) to achieve the best clinical efficacy. Methods According to the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) combining conduct disorder ( CD ), 120 cases of children were randomly divided into the original dose group and dose titration group.Two groups of children accepted the 24-week treatment of OROS-MPH , in which the original dose group were chosen to 18 mg/day , dose titration group increased to 36 mg/day or 54 mg/day , respectively , in the fifth week and thirteenth week , and after the course of treatment , the following assessments were performed : SNAP-IV scale , Child Behavior Checklist ( CBCL ) and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale ( TESS ) . Results ( 1 ) The best response rate in the dose titration group was significantly higher than original dose group (P< 0.05 ) . ( 2 ) The SNAP-IV hyperactivity / impulsivity , inattention and confrontation behavior items showed a significant difference between dose titration group and original dose group (P< 0.05 ) . ( 3 ) In the CBCL behavior scales , dose titration group and the original dose group showed significant difference in the presence of adverse exchanges , forcedness , hyperactivity , agattention deficit hyperactivity disorgression and discipline of the five dimensions (P< 0.05 ) . ( 4 ) The incidence of side effects in both groups of children had no significant difference (P> 0.05 ) . Conclusion With different doses of OROS-MPH for the treatment of children with ADHD and CD , effects differ more obviously-the higher dose ( 36 mg/day-54 mg/day ) for the improvement of symptoms is better than lower dose ( 18 mg/day ) .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?