Critical Values of Double Test of Down Syndrome in Second Trimester Pregnancy

付杰,杨慧霞,范正红,于丽,马京梅,王玲
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2010.20.011
2010-01-01
Chinese General Practice
Abstract:Objective To explore the values of high-risk cut-off value 1∶380 and 1∶270 in screening Down syndrome(DS) by serum double test in second trimester pregnancy.Methods Chemiluminescence method was used to detect,by double test,the serum of 11 368 women in second trimester pregnancy.The high-risk value of DS was calculated,and the critical values were set at 1∶380 and 1∶270,respectively,and their cut-off values were compared in detecting fetal chromosomal abnormalities and fetal loss.Results When cut-off value at 1∶380,high-risk of DS was detected in 941 pregnancy women,with a positive rate of 8.28%(941/11 368),847 were followed up,including 4 confirmed as trisomy 21,and the predictive value of trisomy 21 was 0.47%(4/847).Four foetus had other chromosome abnormalities with clinical significance:1 trisomy 18,1 trisomy 13,1 45X,1 45X/46XX(5∶95),accounting for 0.47%(4/847).When cut-off value set at 1∶270,521 subjects had high risk,the positive rate was 4.58%(521/11 368),458 were followed up,including the above-mentioned 8 foetus with chromosome abnormalities;the trisomy 21 positive predictive value was 0.87%(4/458);4 foetus had other chromosome abnormalities with clinical significance,accounting for 0.87%(4/458).When cut-off value at 1∶380,15 DS high-risk pregnancy women had induced labor/abortion due to other causes(fetal death,malformation,intrauterine growth retardation),3 had neonatal malformation.Taking 1∶270 as critical value,a total of 13 DS high-risk pregnancy women had induced labor/abortion due to other causes,2 had neonatal malformation.There was not significant difference in fetus loss and neonatal malformation between pregnancy women with screening values >1∶270 and >1∶380(χ2=1.595,P=0.207).Conclusion When cut-off value set at 1∶270,screening positive rate decreases but misdiagnosis rate does not increase,which is of more clinical screening values.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?