Cross-species Amplification of Microsatellite Markers from Pseudosciaena Crocea in Sciaenidae

LIN Neng-feng,SU Yong-quan,DING Shao-xiong,WANG Jun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1005-8737.2008.02.007
2008-01-01
Journal of Fishery Sciences of China
Abstract:The objectives of this study were to assess the ability of 8 pairs of microsatellite primers developed from Pseudosciaena crocea to amplify microsatellites in ten species of Sciaenidae fishes which were collected from coast of Zhejiang Province and Fujian Province. It was found that the rate of successful amplification in species belonging to the same genus or the same subfamily as the target species was high. In the subfamily of Pseudosciaeninae,7 loci( PC1C4,PC4H12,PC5E11,PC7H4,PC8F5,PC10F10,PC10G6 ) were amplified successfully in P. polyactis,and 6 loci were amplified successfully in Collichthys lucidus except PC4H12 and PC7A2. These loci which could be amplified revealed polymorphism in Pseudosciaeninae. Primers of these loci were also useful in species of Argyrosominae,Johniinae,Otolithinae and Sciaeninae. 6 loci (PC1C4,PC4H12, PC7A2,PC7H4,PC10F10,PC10G6) of 8 loci were amplified successfully in Otolithes argenteus. Loci PC1C4, PC4H12,PC7H4,PC10F10,PC10G6 could be amplified successfully in Nibea miichthioides and Sciaenops ocellatus,while PC1C4,PC7A2,PC7H4,PC10F10,PC10G6 in Wak tingi. Loci PC1C4,PC7A2,PC10F10, PC10G6 and loci PC1C4,PC7H4,PC10F10,PC10G6 have been amplified in N. chui and Chrysochir aureus, respectively. Meanwhile,only 3 loci(PC7H4,PC10F10,PC10G6)were amplified successfully in Johnias belengerii. Our cross-species amplification data indicated that allelic diversity was very low in other species compared with P. crocea. For example,locus PC10F10 has high allelic diversity in P. crocea but it has only one allele in S. ocellatus. Loci PC10F10 and PC10G6 were extremely conservative,they could be amplified in all species used in the test. The result suggested that these two loci had potential value in inter-specific molecular comparisons and phylogeny reconstruction among different Sciaenidae fishes. Loci PC5E11 and PC8F5 were only amplified in subfamily Pseudosciaeninae. Maybe they were specific loci in Pseudosciaeninae,which indicated we could use these loci to identify species of Pseudosciaeninae from other Sciaenidae fishes. In additional,we found that there were differences between closely related Sciaenidae fishes in average allelic length and the number of alleles which had been scored,thus the microsatellite’s footprints of each taxonomic species might be used to discriminate closely related species,but it need more data to confirm the inferrer.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?