Liquid-phase microextraction of aromatic amines: hollow fiber–liquid-phase microextraction and parallel artificial liquid membrane extraction comparison
Nerea Lorenzo-Parodi,Wiebke Kaziur-Cegla,Astrid Gjelstad,Torsten C. Schmidt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-023-04579-w
2023-03-08
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Abstract:Aromatic amines (AA) are carcinogenic compounds that can enter the human body through many sources, one of the most important being tobacco smoke. They are excreted with the urine, from which they can be extracted and measured. To that end, hollow fiber-liquid-phase microextraction (HF-LPME) and parallel artificial liquid membrane extraction (PALME) were optimized for the analysis of representative aromatic amines, as alternatives to liquid–liquid extraction (LLE). Relevant extraction parameters, namely organic solvent, extraction time, agitation speed, and acceptor solution pH, were studied, and the two optimized techniques—HF-LPME: dihexyl ether, 45 min, 250 rpm, and pH 1; PALME: undecane, 20 min, 250 rpm and pH 1—were compared. Comparison of the optimized methods showed that significantly higher recoveries could be obtained with PALME than with HF-LPME. Therefore, PALME was further validated. The results were successful for nine different AA, with regression coefficients ( R 2 ) of at least 0.991, limits of detection (LOD) of 45–75 ng/L, and repeatability and peak area relative standard deviations (RSD) below 20%. Furthermore, two urine samples from smokers were measured as proof of concept, and 2-methylaniline was successfully quantified in one of them. These results show that PALME is a great green alternative to LLE. Not only does it use much smaller volumes of toxic organic solvents, and sample—enabling the study of samples with limited available volumes—but it is also less time consuming and labor intensive, and it can be automated.
chemistry, analytical,biochemical research methods