Significance of systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with macroscopic stageⅠepithelial ovarian carcinoma

马珂,温宏武,廖秦平

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-1861.2010.02.008

2010-01-01

Abstract:Objective To investigate the significance of systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with macroscopic stageⅠepithelial ovarian carcinoma.Methods Eighty-nine patients with macroscopic stage Ⅰ epithelial ovarian carcinoma were treated in Peking University First Hospital from January 1994 to December 2005. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they had undergone lymphadenectomy or not. Forty-five patients who had not undergone lymphadenectomy were assigned into group Ⅰ and the other forty-four patients who had received lymphadenectomy were in group Ⅱ. The clinicopathological features were compared and factors associated with survival were identified.Results Nine patients (20.4%) were lymph node positive in group Ⅱ. The lymph node metastatic rate in patients with poor differentiated ovarian carcinoma was higher than those with well or moderate differentiated carcinoma. The 2 year and 5 year overall survival rate were 93.3% and 91.1%, respectively in group Ⅰ, and were 95.4% and 90.9% in group Ⅱ. The prognosis had no statistically difference between the two groups. Cox regression analysis identified that only stage was the independent prognostic factor for patients who had undergone systematic lymphadectomy. The prognosis in patients with stage ⅠA,ⅠB and ⅠC were better than that in stage ⅢC.Conclusions Lymph node excision is valuable for the accurate surgical staging of macroscopic stageⅠepithelial ovarian carcinoma, especially for the poor differentiated carcinoma. However it could not improve the prognosis of these patients. The significance of second surgery for patients without surgical staging at first operation needs more investigation.