Comparison of Short-Term Outcome between Laparoscopic Surgery and Open Surgery with Fast-Track in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

YANG Ting-han,WU Fan,TANG Zhi-yun,TAI Yang,WANG Xiao-dong,LI Li
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the short-term outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and open surgery with fast-track(FT) in patients with colorectal cancer.Methods Between February 2008 and August 2008,the clinical data of 177 patients with colorectal cancer were analyzed retrospectively,who were divided into open group(n=122) and laparoscopic group(n=55) by surgery methods.Open group was further divided into FT group(n=66) and traditional group(n=56).Early rehabilitations were studied and compared among three groups.Results ① The baseline characteristics of patients among three groups were no significant differences(P>0.05) exclude operation time.② In early rehabilitation,the first flatus of patients in both the FT group((3.86±1.01) d) and the laparoscopic group((3.78±1.10) d) was significantly earlier than that in the traditional group((4.43±1.25) d),P<0.05.③ The first oral intaking in the FT group((2.52±1.14) d) was earlier than that in the traditional group((3.38±1.43) d) and the laparoscopic group((5.04±2.24) d),P<0.05,while in the traditional group was earlier than that in the laparoscopic group(P<0.05).④ For drainage management,both the FT group and the traditional group were significantly earlier than those in the laparoscopic group(P<0.05).⑤ For postoperative hospital stay,in the FT group((8.33±1.98) d) was also much shorter than that in the laparoscopic group((10.55±3.14) d) and the traditional group((10.82±3.76) d),P<0.05.⑥ For the postoperative complications,there was no significant difference among three groups(P>0.05).Conclusions FT surgery and laparoscopic technique could both enhance recovery of bowel function,and FT could also shorten postoperative hospital stay.However,further studies are needed to develop a better management.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?