The Public and Medical Staff Understanding of COVID-19: A Large Sample, Multi-Center, Cross-Sectional Study
Yi-Bo Wu,Si-Tong Liu,Xi-Zhe He,Chun Yu,Xiang-Dong Huang,Lin-Ling Shi,Qin Tang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/s2689980920400023
2020-01-01
Journal of Emergency Management and Disaster Communications
Abstract:Objective: To understand the cognition condition of the public and medical staff of COVID-19. Method: A cross-sectional study was carried out by giving out online questionnaires. Results: The scores of medical staff and the public are 92.47 ± 5.76 and 89.53 ± 8.27, respectively, the differences between them are statistically significant (p = 0.000). The accuracies of medical staff and the public in etiological characteristics, clinical characteristics, disease definition, disease prevention and treatment and misunderstanding are 91.27 ± 11.60%, 86.73 ± 15.74%, 86.73 ± 15.74%, 98.63 ± 4.23%, 87.84 ± 13.53% and 87.52 ± 14.64%, 84.09 ± 17.49%, 93.63 ± 10.20%, 97.30 ± 8.10%, and 87.43 ± 13.51%, respectively. Residence, region and education background have significant impacts on the scores of medical staff, gender, residence, age, region and education background have significant effects on the scores of the public. Conclusions: The cognition of medical staff and the public of COVID-19 is favorable, and the former is better than the latter, both of them have good grasps of disease prevention and treatment, while have poor grasps of clinical characteristics and misunderstanding of the virus. The demographic characteristics have some effects on the cognition condition of the subjects.