Effect of Oral Artemether in Controlling Schistosomiasis in A Heavy Endemic Area of Nanji Town,Xinjian County,Jiangxi Province

SONG Yu,BAO Zi-ping,GAO Zu-lu,N An,HU Qi-long,CHEN Ming-gang,CHEN Fan-jing,GE Jun,XIAO Shu-hua,ZHOU Xiao-nong,XU Jing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-3619.2006.11.013
2006-01-01
Journal of Tropical Medicine
Abstract:Objective To study the effect of artemether(Art)in protection of the residents from infection with Schistosoma japonicum in a heavily endemic area of Nanji Township located in the Poyang Lake.Methods Nansan islet in Nanji Township was selected as the pilot of the study where most of the residents engaged in semi-agriculture and semi-fishery.From May to November,2004,the residents aged 6-65 years in the pilot were selected for the study and allocated randomly to Art I group,Art Ⅱ group and the control group.One month before performance of prevention with Art,all the residents were treated orally with praziquantel at a single dose of 40 mg/kg post stool examination.In Art I group,the first dose of 6 mg/kg was given to the residents in late May,followed by repeated dosing every 15 days for 13 doses.In Art Ⅱ group,the same dose of Art was given monthly for 7 months.Placebo(starch,6 mg/kg)was given to the residents in the control group at the same time as in Art I group.The efficacy was evaluated by stool examination 40-60 days post the last medication.Double blind method was used in stool examination,administration of the drug and observation.Results In Art I group,14 out of 413 residents examined revealed stool positive with an egg-positive rate of 3.4%,while in the control group,79 out of 587 residents showed stool positive with egg-positive rate of 13.5%.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant with a protection rate of 74.8%.In Art Ⅱ group,42 out of 402 residents revealed stool positive with an egg-positive rate of 10.5% which exhibited no significant difference compared with the control group.Conclusion In the heavily endemic area,oral Art given every 15 days during the whole endemic season exhibited a promising preventive effect.But much less effect was seen,when Art was given monthly.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?