On Comparison of Spatial Interpolation Methods of Daily Rainfall Data: A Case Study of Shenzhen

宋丽琼,田原,邬伦,张晖
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1560-8999.2008.05.003
2008-01-01
Geo-information Science
Abstract:Discrete or continuous rainfall data are required to run many GIS models for environment and planning.The paper attempts to make a general comparison on different spatial interpolation methods.It carried out a study on four spatial interpolation methods: Inverse Distance Weighing(IDW),Local Polynomial,Ordinary Kriging and co-Kriging with respect to elevation.Daily rainfall data obtained from 36 rainfall stations during 27 inconsecutive days in the rainy season of 2006 in Shenzhen was employed in this study.Cross validation of the results shows that the four methods could to some extent reflect the rainfall situation of the region,yet the four interpolated surfaces are more smoothing than the practical circumstance.Particularly,IDW is the most smoothing one of the four.Besides,all the criteria(Mean Error,Mean Absolute Error,Root Mean Square Error and Percentage Error)that brought up in our study to measure accuracy of the four methods demonstrated that Ordinary Kriging and co-Kriging methods are superior to Local Polynomial and IDW.Inclusion of elevation in the co-Kriging method does not lead to improvement of result compared with Ordinary Kriging method.Furthermore,the interpolation data was grouped according to elevation and average daily rainfall and the same criteria above was bought to the statistics of those groups.Comparison on the criteria reveals that,the interpolated result on rain gauge stations with high elevation tend to larger than the observed data,and those rain gauge stations with low elevation are on the contrary.The interpolation error increases sharply while the average daily rainfall is bigger than 50mm.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?