Abstract:OBJECTIVES:To compare the effectiveness of two minimally invasive procedures, namely computed tomography-guided aspiration and the key-hole approach, in the neurosurgical management for spontaneous putaminal haemorrhage, and to explore the indications for the two approaches.DESIGN:A multicentre, single-blinded controlled trial.SETTING:Hospitals taking part in this trial and the sources for patients were from China. Among others, the hospitals involved in the interventions included: the Beijing Tiantan Hospital (of the Capital University of Medical Sciences), the General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, the Peking Union Hospital, and the Shanghai Huashan Hospital (of the Fudan University medical school).PATIENTS:From September 2001 to November 2003, data were available for analysis from a total of 841 patients with spontaneous putaminal haemorrhage from 135 hospitals all over China (except Tibet, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Macao). All follow-up data were for at least 3 months.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Mortality, Glasgow Coma Scale score, postoperative complications, Kanofsky Performance Scale score, and Barthel Index.RESULTS:There were 563 patients who underwent computed tomography-guided aspiration, and 165 were treated by the key-hole approach. Respective mortality rates 1 month after the operation were 17.9% and 18.3%; at 3 months they were 19.4% and 19.4%. In those undergoing computed tomography-guided aspiration, mortality rates at 3 months after the operation were 28.2% in patients with Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 8 or below, as opposed to 8.2% in those with higher scores. This amounted to a 3.4-fold difference. In those treated by the key-hole approach, the corresponding rates were 30.2% and 7.6%, which amounted to a 4-fold difference. The corresponding mortality at 3 months in patients with complications was 3.9 times as great as in those without complications. In those with haematoma volumes of 70 mL or greater, it was 2.7 times as much as in those in whom the volumes below 30 mL. The postoperative complication rate of computed tomography-guided aspiration (23.7%) did not differ significantly from that in those having the key-hole approach (25.7%) [P=0.420].CONCLUSIONS:Computed tomography-guided aspiration is not superior to the key-hole approach for treating spontaneous putaminal haemorrhage in terms of favourable outcomes, mortality, and morbidity. However, it could be the first-choice approach for those with bleeds of 50 mL or less, while the key-hole approach may be more suitable for those with larger haematomas.

Comparison of CT-guided Aspiration to Key Hole Craniotomy in the Surgical Treatment of Spontaneous Putaminal Hemorrhage: a Prospective Randomized Study.

Computed Tomography-Guided Aspiration Versus Key-Hole Craniotomy for Spontaneous Putaminal Haemorrhage: a Prospective Comparison of Minimally Invasive Procedures.

Treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage through keyhole transsylvian approach.

[The Efficacy of Three Different Approaches in Treatment of Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage: a Multi-Center Single-Blind Study of 2464 Patients].

A Comparison of Subperiosteal or Subgaleal Drainage with Subdural Drainage on the Outcomes of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Meta-Analysis

Effect of minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage: a single center retrospective analysis

Analysis Of Three Surgical Treatments For Spontaneous Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage

A comparison of the efficacy of computed tomography-guided minimally invasive puncture and drainage and craniotomy for hematoma evacuation in the treatment of cerebellar hemorrhage

Efficacy of Neuroendoscopic Surgery and Craniotomy for Spontaneous Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Endoscopic Surgery versus Minimal Puncture Drainage Surgery for Treatment of Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Evaluation of the Therapeutic Effect of CT-guided Microinvasive Aspiration and Drainage on Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage

A Prospective Controlled Study: Minimally Invasive Stereotactic Puncture Therapy Versus Conventional Craniotomy in the Treatment of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Portable 3D-Head Computed Tomography (CT) Navigation-Guided Key-Hole Microsurgery for Spontaneous Hypertensive Hemorrhages

Minimally Invasive Puncture and Drainage or Patients with Hypertensive Spontaneous Basal Ganglia Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Prospective Non-Randomized Comparative Study of 198 Cases

Neuroendoscopic Surgery Versus Craniotomy for Supratentorial Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparison of clinical efficacy of endoscopic surgery versus puncture drainage for patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia

A comparison study of endoscopic surgery versus craniotomy in management of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage

Minimally Invasive Puncture Versus Conventional Craniotomy for Spontaneous Supratentorial Hemorrhage: A Meta-Analysis

Comparison of Endoscopic Evacuation, Craniotomy, and Puncture Aspiration for the Treatment of Spontaneous Basal Ganglia Intracerebral Hematoma.

Endoscopic Surgery Versus Craniotomy in the Treatment of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hematoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Spontaneous Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.