Abstract:Background To explore the effect of b-value distributions on the repeatability and diagnostic performance of the ADC value in rectal cancer patients using multiple b-values and mono-exponential model diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Methods Thirty-two preoperative rectal cancer patients, without receiving neoadjuvant therapy, were scanned on a 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanner using DWI with 10 b-values ranging from 0 to 2000 s/mm 2 . The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value was calculated using a mono-exponential model and 31 b-value combinations consisting of 2 to 10 b-values were explored. Regions of interest with the maximum cross-sectional tumour size were outlined on the ADC map by two independent observers. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV), and Bland-Altman plots between the two observers were calculated and evaluated to determine repeatability. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were evaluated for rectal cancer characterization. Correlations between the mean ADC values and T stage were assessed using the Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ). α (= ICC + AUC + |ρ|- CV - |bias|) was defined and used to assess the optimal b-value distribution. Results Postoperative pathology tests revealed 4 patients with T1, 10 patients with T2, and 18 patients with T3 stages. There were no significant difference in age and sex between the two groups (T1–2 vs. T3). Excellent reproducibility was observed for ADC values between two observers with ICC and CV values ranging from 0.920 to 0.998, and 1.475 to 5.568%, respectively. The mean percent difference and ρ between the paired measurements was ranged from − 2.7 to 1.2% and from − 0.759 to − 0.407, respectively. The b-value combinations with the top three α values were b(0, 1000 s/mm 2 ), b(500, 1500, 2000 s/mm 2 ) and b(100, 1000, 1500 s/mm 2 ) for α = 2.581, 2.571 and 2.569, respectively. Conclusions The number of b-values and their distributions influenced the repeatability of the ADC values and their diagnostic performance. The optimal b-value combination was 0 and 1000 s/mm 2 for DWI examination of rectal cancer patients.

The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in combination with T2-weighted imaging for rectal cancer detection.

Comparison of reduced field‐of‐view diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) and conventional DWI techniques in the assessment of rectal carcinoma at 3.0T: Image quality and histological T staging

T staging of rectal cancer: accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging compared with T2-weighted imaging on 3.0 tesla MRI.

The Clinical Value Of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging In Combination With T2-Weighted Imaging In Diagnosing Prostate Carcinoma: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

Clinical value of T2-weighted imaging combined with diffusion-weighted imaging in preoperative T staging of urinary bladder cancer: a large-scale, multiobserver prospective study on 3.0-T MRI.

Quantitative T2-Weighted Imaging and Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Rectal Cancer: Correlation of R2 and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient With Histopathological Prognostic Factors

Comparison of Computed and Acquired DWI in the Assessment of Rectal Cancer: Image Quality and Preoperative Staging.

Value of MR diffusion weighted imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer

[The Value of Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging Combined with Transrectal Ultrasound for Transrectal Prostate Biopsy].

Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Colorectal Cancer Detection: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The Role of Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer

Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Predicting the Response of Rectal Cancer to Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiation

Comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging and pathological prognostic factors in rectal cancer

Application value of different sequences magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer re-staging after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy

Evaluation of Diffusion Weighted Imaging in the Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer

Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of Rectal Cancer: Determination of B Values and Evaluation of Displaying Ability

Diffusion-weighted imaging of rectal cancer on repeatability and cancer characterization: an effect of b-value distribution study

[Combined Usage of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound for Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: a Preliminary Study].

Value of magnetic resonance imaging combined with diffusion-weighted MR tumor volumetry in the diagnosis of TN staging for rectal cancer

Added Value of Diffusion-Weighted Mr Imaging to T2-Weighted and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Mr Imaging in T Staging of Gastric Cancer

Value of MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI for the diagnosis of locally recurrent rectal cancer