Abstract:Net primary productivity(NPP) is a conceptual breakthrough in improving ecological footprint(EF) analysis.Three common features shared by the two assessment methods are the following:(1) an overlapping of space occupied.EF converts all consumption into land most of which also participates in global carbon cycle and is involved in net primary production;(2) the same basic measurement units adopted in them.EF that uses biological productivity as the basic measurement unit converts physical hectares into global hectares equal to the global average productivity,and NPP is employed as a common indicator of biological productivity.Therefore,both methods measure ecological sustainability directly based on biological productivity in essence;and(3) the complementary to each other for further information.They both emphasize the desirability of reducing the demand for nonrenewable resources.NPP can provide some missing information on analyzing sustainability when combined with EF.On the other hand,EF is able to compensate NPP for the lack of straightforwardness when tracking the maintenance of the biosphere′s capacity. As a matter of fact,more and more studies attempt to include ocean,grassland and cropland′s capacity for carbon sequestration into energy ecological footprint(EEF) assessment.However,EEF,the most important and disputed subject of EF,has rarely been applied in combination with NPP as modified methodologies.Of particular concern is how EEF is defined and what it actually measures,exclusion of a majority of land and water and failure to capture their actual capacity for carbon sequestration.Moreover,it illustrates the hypothetical land appropriation of energy consumption,which is inevitably in conflict with the actual appropriated land for biological production in one aggregation of EFs calculation. In this paper,a modified method for assessing EEF is developed based on global NPP,thereby primarily focusing on the interaction between CO2 emissions and land carbon sequestration.The results demonstrate the followings:(1) ocean,forest and grassland are the principal spatial components of EEF equivalents that measure EEF per unit mass of energy,accounting for 28.32%,27.25% and 21.77% of the total,respectively;(2) the EEF factors that represent the calorific values per area of land appropriation for each group of energy decrease from 9.76×107 to 68 GJ/hm2 corresponding to electricity,gaseous energy,liquid energy and solid energy;and(3) all the energy sources would produce less ecological impact when using the modified method compared with the traditional method,as a result of considering the contribution of carbon sequestration from all types of land and water on the globe. It is indicated as follows:(1) the EEF based on NPP reflects the world-average land appropriation of energy consumption;(2) linking biological productivity and carbon sequestration rate through NPP is able to reduce the disparity in spatial composition between EEF and the biological EF and hereby enhances their logic consistency;(3) changing the basis for EEF calculation from forest′s carbon sequestration rate to NPP,is a useful tool for assessing the world-average land appropriation of energy consumption;and(4) the modified method can be used to improve the validity and accuracy of the calculation results and make more meaningful assessment of energy consumption for sustainable development.

Calculation and Analysis of Equivalence Factor and Yield Factor of Ecological Footprint Based on Sub-national Hectare: A Case Study of Zhejiang

A modified ecological footprint analysis to a sub-national area: The case study of Zheiian? Province

A Nalysis of a Land Carrying Capacity Index Based on an Expanded Three-Dimensional Ecological Footprint Model: a Case Study of Wenzhou

Ecological Footprint Analysis of One County Based on "city Hectare" Model

Ecological footprint assessment of sustainable development in Zhejiang

ANALYSIS ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ZHEJIANG PROVINCE BASED ON ENERGY ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT METHOD

Adjustment for Regional Ecological Footprint Based on Input-Output Technique:A Case Study of Jiangsu Province in 2002

Comparative Study on Land Bearing Capacity Based on Ecological Footprint and Agro-Ecological Zone Modelstake Guiyang As an Instance

A Modified Model of Ecological Footprint Calculation Based on the Theory of Emergy Analysis-Taking Jiangsu Province as an Example

Study on Sustainable Utilization of Cultivated Land in Zhejiang Province Based on Modified Emergy-Ecological Footprint Model

A modified method of ecological footprint calculation and its application

The Calculation and Analysis of Ecological Footprints of Wuhu City in 2003

Dynamic Analysis of Ecological Footprint of Biological Resource: a Case Study of the "two Circles" in Hubei Province

Revising Yield and Equivalence Factors of Ecological Footprints Based on Land-Use Conversion

High Spatio-Temporal Heterogeneity of Carbon Footprints in the Zhejiang Province, China, from 2005 to 2015: Implications for Climate Change Policies

[Dynamics of three-dimensional ecological footprint of Zhejiang coastal zone and its influencing factors based on GTWR model]

An improved emergy ecological footprint method for ecological security assessment and quantitative analysis of influencing factors: a case study of Zhejiang Province

Calculation Method of Energy Ecological Footprint Based on Global Net Primary Productivity

Ecological Footprint Calculation Of Beijing Based On Net Primary Productivity And Its Comparison With Traditional Models

Measuring Urban Ecological Sustainability:A Case Study in Shenzhen City

“省公顷”生态足迹模型中均衡因子及产量因子的计算——以浙江省为例