Effects of a Compound Feeding Attractant on Feed Intake and Growth of Japanese Flounder(paralichthys Olivaceus Temminck Et Schlegel)

CHEN Jing-hua,ZHANG Wen-bing,MAI Kang-sen,AI Qing-hui,WANG Xiao-jie,LIUFU Zhi-guo,MA Hong-ming,TAN Bei-ping,XU Wei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1005-8737.2006.06.014
2006-01-01
Journal of Fishery Sciences of China
Abstract:A feeding study was conducted to examine the effects of a compound feeding attractant in the diets containing soybean meal(SBM) on feed intake and growth of Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus.The compound feeding attractant contained betaine,dimethyl-β-propiothetin,trimethylamine hydrochloride,citric acid,glycine,taurine and L-glutamic acid sodium salt with a ratio of 5∶2∶10∶1∶1∶1∶1.Five isonitrogenous(50.5% crude protein) and isocaloric(20.5?kJ/g) diets were formulated.The control diet(FM diet) contained 70% fish meal as the protein source,while 45% fish meal protein was replaced by SBM protein in the soybean meal diets(SBM diet) supplemented with 0.0%,0.5%,1.0% and 1.5% compound feeding attractant.Each diet was randomly fed to triplicate groups of Japanese flounder with initial body weight(3.01±0.04) g.The fish were fed to apparent satiation twice daily(08∶00,16∶00).During the experimental period,the water temperature fluctuated between 22.5?℃ and 25.5?℃,salinity between 29.5 and 32.0 and dissolved oxygen was not less than 7.0?mg/L.At the end of the 10-week feeding trial,survival and protein efficiency ratio(PER) were not significantly different among dietary treatments(P0.05).The specific growth rate(SGR) of fish fed SBM diets with 0.0% and 0.5% compound feeding attractant were significantly lower than that in control(P0.05).However,the SGR of fish fed SBM diets with 1.0% and 1.5% compound feeding attractant were not significantly different from that in control.The fish fed SBM diet containing 1.0% supplemental feeding attractant exhibited significantly higher feed intake(FI,P0.05) and feed efficiency ratio(FER,P0.05) than the fish fed SBM diet without supplemental attractant.The FI and FER were not significantly different between the fish fed control diet and SBM diets with compound feeding attractant(P0.05).The whole-body moisture,crude protein and energy were not significantly affected by the feeding attractant(P0.05).The whole-body crude lipid in control,and in group of SBM diets with 0.5% and 1.0% feeding attractant were significantly higher than that in group of SBM diet without feeding attractant(P0.01).The ash in fish fed SBM diets was significantly higher than that in fish fed FM diet(P0.01).The fish fed SBM diet containing 1.0% compound feeding attractant showed significantly higher activities of trypsin in liver and intestine and leucine aminopeptidase in intestine than the fish fed SBM diet without feeding attractant(P0.01).The amylase in intestine and lipase in liver were not significantly different among dietary treatments(P0.05).The results indicate that 1.0% compound feeding attractant added to the SBM diet(SBM protein replaced 45% FM protein) can improve feed intake and growth responses of Japanese founder(Paralichthys olivaceus).[Journal of Fishery Sciences of China,2006,13(6):959-965]
What problem does this paper attempt to address?