Abstract:Plant Biotechnology JournalEarly View Brief CommunicationOpen Access Functional analysis of the glutathione S-transferases from Thinopyrum and its derivatives on wheat Fusarium head blight resistance Xianrui Guo, Xianrui Guo State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China These authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this authorQinghua Shi, Qinghua Shi State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China These authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this authorMian Wang, Mian Wang State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China These authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this authorJing Yuan, Jing Yuan State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorJing Zhang, Jing Zhang State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorJing Wang, Jing Wang State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYang Liu, Yang Liu State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorHandong Su, Handong Su orcid.org/0000-0001-8621-2941 State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorZhen Wang, Zhen Wang Nanyang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanyang, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorJinbang Li, Jinbang Li Nanyang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanyang, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorCheng Liu, Cheng Liu Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorXingguo Ye, Corresponding Author Xingguo Ye [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0003-0995-3628 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, ChinaCorrespondence (Tel +86 10 6480 7926; fax +86 10 6485 4467; email [email protected] (F.H.); Tel +86 10 8210 5171; fax +86 10 8210 9765; email [email protected] (X.Y.))Search for more papers by this authorFangpu Han, Corresponding Author Fangpu Han [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0001-8393-3575 State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, ChinaCorrespondence (Tel +86 10 6480 7926; fax +86 10 6485 4467; email [email protected] (F.H.); Tel +86 10 8210 5171; fax +86 10 8210 9765; email [email protected] (X.Y.))Search for more papers by this author Xianrui Guo, Xianrui Guo State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China These authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this authorQinghua Shi, Qinghua Shi State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China These authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this authorMian Wang, Mian Wang State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China These authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this authorJing Yuan, Jing Yuan State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorJing Zhang, Jing Zhang State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorJing Wang, Jing Wang State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYang Liu, Yang Liu State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorHandong Su, Handong Su orcid.org/0000-0001-8621-2941 State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorZhen Wang, Zhen Wang Nanyang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanyang, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorJinbang Li, Jinbang Li Nanyang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanyang, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorCheng Liu, Cheng Liu Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorXingguo Ye, Corresponding Author Xingguo Ye [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0003-0995-3628 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, ChinaCorrespondence (Tel +86 10 6480 7926; fax +86 10 6485 4467; email [email protected] (F.H.); Tel +86 10 8210 5171; fax +86 10 8210 9765; email [email protected] (X.Y.))Search for more papers by this authorFangpu Han, Corresponding Author Fangpu Han [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0001-8393-3575 State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, ChinaCorrespondence (Tel +86 10 6480 7926; fax +86 10 6485 4467; email [email protected] (F.H.); Tel +86 10 8210 5171; fax +86 10 8210 9765; email [email protected] (X.Y.))Search for more papers by this author First published: 01 February 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.14021 AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Fusarium head blight (FHB) is one of the devastating diseases for wheat production worldwide, which causes significant yield losses and reduces grain quality because of mycotoxins contamination in wheat grains. As wheat relatives, Thinopyrum elongatum and Th. ponticum are important genetic resources that can be used to improve wheat FHB resistance. Using recombinant inbred lines derived from a cross between two Thatcher-Th. ponticum substitution lines, K11463 (7E1/7D) and K2620 (7E2/7D), the major FHB resistance locus Fhb7 was mapped to the very distal region of the long arm of chromosome 7E2 (Guo et al., 2015). Wang et al. (2020) sequenced the genome of Th. elongatum and cloned the glutathione S-transferase-encoding Fhb7 by genetic mapping. Relying on the recombination between Th. elongatum chromosome 7E and Th. ponticum chromosome 7E1, a resistant gene Fhb-7EL for FHB resistance was located to the long arm of 7E (Ceoloni et al., 2017). To transfer the resistant gene Fhb-7EL to common wheat, hundreds of wheat-Th. elongatum translocation lines were developed by irradiating the pollen of the wheat-Th. elongatum addition line Chinese Spring (CS)-7EL at anthesis, among which Zhongke 1878 proved to carry an approximately 100 Mb 7EL chromatin on chromosome 6DL (Figure 1a, Figure S1, Appendix S1). After backcrossing Zhongke 1878 with the highly susceptible variety Jimai 22 for six generations, FHB resistance evaluation showed that the translocated chromosome could significantly increase the FHB resistance of Jimai 22 to the level of Sumai 3 by decreasing the number of diseased spikelets from 13.43 to 1.43 (Figure 1b,c). Figure 1Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Functional analysis of the glutathione S-transferases on FHB resistance. (a) Cytological analysis on the line Zhongke 1878. Alien chromatin was detected by using the green probe 7EL-1. (b, c) FHB resistance evaluation on Zhongke 1878. The diseased spikes were photographed (b) and the number of diseased spikelets was calculated (c) at 21 days after inoculation with Fusarium species. (d, e) Expression pattern of T26102 in Zhongke 1878 measured by transcriptomic data (d) and qRT-PCR (e). (f) Sequence comparisons of Fhb7 homologues among wheat-Thinopyrum derivatives. ‘1’ and ‘2’ indicate two different homologues in lines CS-7EL and SNTE20. (g, h) FHB resistance evaluation on wheat-Thinopyrum derivatives. The diseased spikes were photographed (g) and the number of diseased spikelets was calculated (h) at 21 days after inoculation with Fusarium species. (i) Expression analysis of T26102 96 h after inoculation with Fusarium species in wheat-Thinopyrum derivatives. (j–n) FHB resistance evaluation on the transgenic lines with Fhb7 homologues. The diseased spikes were photographed and the number of diseased spikelets was calculated at 7 days after inoculation with Fusarium species. pUbi:Fhb7 indicated that Fhb7 was driven by the ubiquitin promoter. pNa:Fhb7 indicated that Fhb7 was driven by the native promoter. (j, k) FHB resistance evaluation on the control (CK) and T0 transgenic lines overexpressing T26102. (l) FHB resistance evaluation on the T0 transgenic lines expressing Fhb7 on the background Zhengmai 7698. (m, n) FHB resistance evaluation on the T1 transgenic lines expressing Fhb7 on the background Kenong 199. ***P < 0.001, ns, P > 0.05. To explore the nature of the FHB resistance gene, we inoculated the spikes of the line Zhongke 1878 with F. graminearum and performed single-molecule real-time isoform sequencing after 96 h. Removing the transcripts derived from wheat and Fusarium species by blasting wheat reference genome and nucleotide database on NCBI, 25 transcripts were identified derived from alien chromatin by PCR in Zhongke 1878 (Figure S2, Tables S1 and S2). To study the mechanisms of FHB resistance in the line Zhongke 1878, next-generation sequencing-based transcriptomic analysis was performed on these 25 transcripts. Annotated as a GST protein, the expression of the transcript T26102 was significantly increased 48 h after inoculation with F. graminearum (Figure 1d,e, Table S1). To illustrate the association between T26102 and FHB resistance, the distribution of T26102 was checked in a series of wheat-Thinopyrum derivatives. The homologue of T26102 was not only detected in wheat-Th. ponticum amphiploid SNTE20 but also in the wheat-Th. ponticum translocation lines 4460 and 4462 (Figure 1f, Figures S3, S4). After sequencing the amplified product, two different T26102 homologues were discovered in lines CS-7EL, Zhongke 1878 and SNTE20 respectively (Figure 1f, Figure S4). Although SNTE20, 4460 and 4462 were proven to carry the GST-encoding Fhb7 homologues, all three lines were identified as susceptible to FHB as well as the susceptible control Jimai 22 (Figure 1g,h). Expression analysis revealed that Fhb7 homologues were induced in lines 4460, 4462 and SNTE20 after inoculating with F. graminearum (Figure 1i). Similar results were also reported in the wheat-Th. ponticum partial amphiploid SNTE122 and translocation line TNT-B (Guo et al., 2022). More puzzling was that the Fhb7 homologue and its promoter shared by 4460 and 4462 were identical to the one in the wheat-Th. ponticum substitution line 7E2/7D used as the resistant parent to map Fhb7 (Figure 1f, Figures S4, S5). All these results casted our doubt on the FHB-resistant function of the GSTs. To verify the FHB resistance function of T26102, we transformed the overexpression vector pUbi:T26102 into three common wheat accessions 19AS161, Jimai 22 and Zhongmai 175. The transgenic positive wheat plants overexpressing T26102 were used for FHB resistance evaluation (Figure S6). A few bleached spikelets were observed on all spikes of both wild types and T0 transgenic plants 7 days after inoculation with F. graminearum (Figure 1j). Statistical analysis was performed between the wild type and the transgenic plants; no difference was discovered between them (Figure 1k). To rule out the effect of amino acid variation on the function of T26102, we also expressed the GST-encoding Fhb7 under the ubiquitin promoter and the same native promoter as reported by Wang et al. (2020) in common wheat varieties Zhengmai 7698 and Kenong 199. Regardless of the vector driven by the ubiquitin promoter or the native promoter, nearly half the inoculated spikes bleached in the Zhengmai 7698 transgenic plants expressing Fhb7 (Figure 1l). Except for the FHB evaluation on the T0 generation, the T1 transgenic plants on Kenong 199 background were chosen to verify the function of Fhb7. With obvious bleached spikelets on the inoculated spikes, no statistical difference in FHB resistance was discovered between the T1 transgenic plants and the control Kenong 199 (Figure 1m,n). These results suggested the GST-encoding Fhb7 also failed to confer wheat FHB resistance. All these results suggested that GSTs from Thinopyrum, including the GST-encoding Fhb7 and its homologues, were not decisive for FHB resistance. Accession number All transcriptomic raw reads for the translocation line Zhongke 1878 are available from the NCBI BioProject under accession number PRJNA720120. Acknowledgements This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0102001). Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. Author contribution F. H. and X. Y. conceived the study. X. G., Q. S. and M. W. conducted the experiment. J. Y., Y. L., J. Z. and J. W. participated in vector construction. H. S. contributed bioinformatics analysis. Z. W., J. L. and C. L. helped FHB resistance evaluation. X. Y. contributed the transgene experiment. X. G. and F. H wrote the manuscript. Supporting Information Filename Description pbi14021-sup-0001-AppendixS1.docxWord 2007 document , 27.2 KB Appendix S1 Methods. pbi14021-sup-0002-FigureS1-S6.pptxapplication/vnd, 32.1 MB Figure S1 Coverage analysis on the Zhongke. Figure S2 Twenty-five specific alien transcripts identified by PCR in Zhongke 1878. Figure S3 Cytological analysis on wheat-Thinopyrum derivatives carrying Fhb7 homologs. Figure S4 Protein sequence alignments of Fhb7 homologs in wheat-Thinopyrum, derivatives. Figure S5 Promoter sequence alignment of Fhb7 homologs. Figure S6 Expression analysis of Fhb7 homolog in transgenic wheat plants. pbi14021-sup-0003-TablesS1andS2.xlsxExcel 2007 spreadsheet , 36.2 KB Table S1 The sequences and function annotation of twenty-five specific transcripts in line Zhongke 1878. Table S2 Primers used in this study. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. References Ceoloni, C., Forte, P., Kuzmanovic, L., Tundo, S., Moscetti, I., De Vita, P., Virili, M.E. et al. (2017) Cytogenetic mapping of a major locus for resistance to Fusarium head blight and crown rot of wheat on Thinopyrum elongatum 7EL and its pyramiding with valuable genes from a Th. ponticum homoeologous arm onto bread wheat 7DL. Theor. Appl. Genet. 130, 2005– 2024. Guo, J., Zhang, X., Hou, Y., Cai, J., Shen, X., Zhou, T., Xu, H. et al. (2015) High-density mapping of the major FHB resistance gene Fhb7 derived from Thinopyrum ponticum and its pyramiding with Fhb1 by marker-assisted selection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 128, 2301– 2316. Guo, X., Wang, M., Kang, H., Zhou, Y. and Han, F. (2022) Distribution, polymorphism and function characteristics of the GST-Encoding Fhb7 in Triticeae. Plan. Theory, 11, 2074. Wang, H., Sun, S., Ge, W., Zhao, L. and Kong, L. (2020) Horizontal gene transfer of Fhb7 from fungus underlies Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat. Science, 368, eaba5435. Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue FiguresReferencesRelatedInformation

Abstract:HomePlant DiseaseVol. 102, No. 12First Report of Burkholderia gladioli Causing Rice Panicle Blight and Grain Discoloration in China PreviousNext DISEASE NOTES OPENOpen Access licenseFirst Report of Burkholderia gladioli Causing Rice Panicle Blight and Grain Discoloration in ChinaS. A. Mirghasempour, S. Huang, and G. L. XieS. A. Mirghasempourhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-5999-8010Search for more papers by this author, S. Huang†Corresponding author: S. Huang; E-mail: E-mail Address: hswswh666@126.comSearch for more papers by this author, and G. L. XieSearch for more papers by this authorAffiliationsAuthors and Affiliations S. A. Mirghasempour S. Huang † , China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou, 310006, China G. L. Xie , State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, Institute of Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310029, China. Published Online:10 Oct 2018https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-05-18-0758-PDNAboutSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailWechat Rice (Oryza sativa) is an important crop worldwide and is a host for many pathogens. Burkholderia gladioli is one of the pathogenic bacteria, producing seedling blight, leaf-sheath browning, bacterial panicle blight (BPB), spikelet discoloration, and grain abortion, similar to those reported by B. glumae as the main pathogen (Nandakumar et al. 2009). Losses due to this disease could reach up to 70% under the conducive conditions of high temperature and high humidity (Nandakumar et al. 2009). In the fall of 2017, symptoms of reddish-brown, necrotic, linear lesions with indistinct margin on flag-leaf sheaths and blighted, upright, grayish-straw color florets with sterility and vain grains on panicles were observed in Hangzhou, Linan, and Fuyang rice fields in Zhejiang Province, China. The disease was sporadic on individual plants and in circular patterns within a field, and the incidence was about 10 to 30%. Samples, including diseased sheaths and panicles showing symptoms of BPB, were collected from rice (cvs. Yong You 12 and Zhongzhe You 1) paddy fields for bacterial isolation. Infected grains and leaf sheaths were sterilized with 75% ethanol for 15 s, 1 min in 1% bleach, rinsed three times with distilled water, and dried on sterile paper. The sterilized seeds were cut into small pieces, crushed in a sterile mortar, and soaked in 5 ml of distilled water for 30 min. A loopful of bacterial suspensions was streaked and cultured on the semiselective S-PG medium (Nandakumar et al. 2009). Single colonies were purified through serial dilution and subculturing on S-PG medium. The purified bacteria was kept on King’s B agar and produced a diffusible yellow pigment. Isolate HA144 was used in the following studies. For molecular identification, polymerase chain reaction was carried out using 16S rRNA primer (5′-AGAGTTTGATCATGGCTCAG-3′ and 5′-AAGGAGGTGATCCAACCGCA-3′) that amplified 1,428 bp of the bacterial sequence (Mondal et al. 2011). The amplified segment was sequenced (GenBank MG386180), and the DNA sequences were compared by BLAST analysis using the NCBI server with other known isolates. The analysis showed that isolate HA144 had 99% identity with B. gladioli strain ATCC 1024 (CP009322.1), B. gladioli strain BgO1-1 (JX566502.1), and B. gladioli strain 1996012911 (AY268166.1). To verify B. gladioli, the 935-bp fragment sequences (GenBank MH281642) obtained from primers 536F (5′-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAATAC-3′) and 1492R (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) (Riera-Ruiz et al. 2014) shared 99% similarity with B. gladioli strain R406 (EU090890.1) and B. gladioli strain 321gr-6 (DQ355169.1). To determine pathogenicity, a suspension of AH144 at 108 CFU/ml was infiltrated into tobacco leaves (Nicotiana tabacum ‘Xanthi’) using a small hypodermic syringe and induced hypersensitive reaction on tobacco 24 h postinoculation (Mondal et al. 2011; Sayler et al. 2006). For the pathogenicity test, bacterial suspension at 108 CFU/ml was spray inoculated by a small sprayer onto susceptible rice plants (cv. Zhong Jia Zao 17) at the heading stage in a greenhouse. To enhance entry of bacterial cells through the stomata and glume pore, incubated panicles were placed in plastic bags at high relative humidity (RH) for 24 h and then transferred to the greenhouse with daytime temperatures of 35 to 37°C and 75% RH under natural photoperiodic conditions. Sterile distilled water was spray inoculated onto panicles of control plants (Fory et al. 2014; Nandakumar et al. 2009). Panicles or florets showed similar symptoms to those observed in the rice paddy field 7 to 10 days after incubation. Koch’s postulates were completed by reisolating the same bacterium from the inoculated rice plants. This is the first report of B. gladioli as one of the agents of panicle blight and grain discoloration in China. Further survey and disease analysis are required to determine the spread and diversity of this important pathogen in the region in order to develop a strategy for its control.References:Fory, P. A., et al. 2014. Phytopathology 104:436. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-07-13-0186-R Link, ISI, Google ScholarMondal, K. K., et al. 2011. Plant Dis. 95:1582. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-06-11-0533 Link, ISI, Google ScholarNandakumar, R., et al. 2009. Plant Dis. 93:896. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-93-9-0896 Link, ISI, Google ScholarRiera-Ruiz, C., et al. 2014. Plant Dis. 98:1577. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-03-14-0222-PDN Link, ISI, Google ScholarSayler, R. J., et al. 2006. Plant Dis. 90:603. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-90-0603 Link, ISI, Google ScholarFunding: Funding was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 31601288), Special Fund of Central Authorities Commonwealth Scientific Research Institute Fundamental Operating Expense (grant no. 2012ZL096), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2016YFD0200801), and Innovation Project of Science and Technology of China Agricultural Academy of Science (grant no. CAAS-ASTIP-2013-CNRRI).DetailsFiguresLiterature CitedRelated Vol. 102, No. 12 December 2018SubscribeISSN:0191-2917e-ISSN:1943-7692 Metrics Article History Issue Date: 20 Nov 2018Published: 10 Oct 2018First Look: 3 Jul 2018Accepted: 29 Jun 2018 Page: 2635 Information© 2018 The American Phytopathological SocietyFundingNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaGrant/Award Number: 31601288Special Fund of Central Authorities Commonwealth Scientific Research Institute Fundamental Operating ExpenseGrant/Award Number: 2012ZL096National Key Research and Development Program of ChinaGrant/Award Number: 2016YFD0200801Innovation Project of Science and Technology of China Agricultural Academy of ScienceGrant/Award Number: CAAS-ASTIP-2013-CNRRICited byFirst Report of Enterobacter kobei Causing Flag-Leaf Sheath Spot on Rice (Oryza sativa) in ChinaS. Ali Mirghasempour, Shiwen Huang, Yuxuan Hou, and Ali Pakdin-Parizi11 May 2022 | Plant Disease, Vol. 106, No. 6Burkholderia gladioli (leaf spot of orchids)CABI Compendium, Vol. CABI CompendiumFirst Report of Bacterial Panicle Blight of Rice Caused by Burkholderia glumae in Southern ChinaY. Hou, Y. Xu, Y. Zhang, L. Yu, L. Liu, L. Wang, and S. Huang13 February 2020 | Plant Disease, Vol. 104, No. 4Sustainable Strategies for Managing Bacterial Panicle Blight in Rice2 October 2019

Registration of Cj 8809 Wheat Germplasm with Fusarium Head Blight Resistance

Registration Of Fhb-Resistant And High-Yielding Wheat Germplasms Cj 9403 And Cj 9815

Registration Of Wheat Germplasms Cj W14 And Cj 9306 Highly Resistant To Fusarium Head Blight

Functional Analysis of the Glutathione S-transferases from Thinopyrum and Its Derivatives on Wheat Fusarium Head Blight Resistance.

First Report of Burkholderia Gladioli Causing Rice Panicle Blight and Grain Discoloration in China

First Report of Fusarium Pseudograminearum Causing Root Rot on Soybean (glycine Max) in Henan, China

Regulatory Network of Preharvest Sprouting Resistance Revealed by Integrative Analysis of mRNA, Noncoding RNA, and DNA Methylation in Wheat

Evaluating Agreement in Different Diagnosis Methods is Necessary

First Report of Southern Blight on Chrysanthemum Morifolium Caused by Sclerotium Rolfsii in China

Searching for Germplasm Resistant to Sheath Blight from the USDA Rice Core Collection

Know Your Community: U.S.-Sino Agricultural Research Forum

ChemInform Abstract: Lysidicins F—H (I) ‐ (III), Three New Phloroglucinols from Lysidice Rhodostegia.

Genetic factors affecting Fusarium head blight resistance improvement from introgression of exotic Sumai 3 alleles (including Fhb1, Fhb2, and Fhb5) in hard red spring wheat

Rice Research: Past, Present and Future

Germplasms, genetics and genomics for better control of disastrous wheat Fusarium head blight

Molecular identification and validation of four stable QTL for adult-plant resistance to powdery mildew in Chinese wheat cultivar Bainong 64

Identification of Two Novel QTL for Fusarium Head Blight Resistance in German Wheat Cultivar Centrum

Characterization of a Powdery Mildew Resistance Gene in Wheat Breeding Line Jingzi 102 Using Bulk Segregant RNA Sequencing

Genetic analysis of resistance to powdery mildew on 7Mg chromosome of wheat-Aegilops geniculata, development and utilization of specific molecular markers

Comparative transcriptomic analysis of wheat cultivars differing in their resistance to Fusarium head blight infection during grain-filling stages reveals unique defense mechanisms at play

Systemic development of wheat‐Thinopyrum elongatum translocation lines and their deployment in wheat breeding for Fusarium head blight resistance