Multilevel Validation of Doppler Wind Lidar by the 325 m Meteorological Tower in the Planetary Boundary Layer of Beijing
Lindong Dai,Jinyuan Xin,Hongchao Zuo,Yongxiang Ma,Lei Zhang,Xinrui Wu,Yongjing Ma,Danjie Jia,Fangkun Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11101051
IF: 3.11
2020-10-01
Atmosphere
Abstract:The high-frequency monitoring of three-dimensional wind fields is crucial in planetary boundary layer meteorology. Doppler wind lidar and meteorological towers are the most important instruments for site observations of three-dimensional wind fields. This study systematically investigated and compared the performances of three wind measurement instruments: A Doppler wind lidar (Windcube 100s), cup anemometer/wind vane and sonic wind anemometer mounted on the 325 m meteorological tower in the polluted urban city of Beijing. The horizontal wind speed measurements of the Doppler wind lidar closely matched those of the cup anemometer and the sonic wind anemometer with high coefficients of determination (R2: 0.79–0.96 and 0.90–0.97, respectively). Moreover, the results also showed good agreement between the three measurements of the prevailing horizontal wind direction. Conversely, there were weak correlations between the vertical wind speeds of the Doppler wind lidar and sonic wind anemometer with low coefficients of determination (R2: 0.30–0.46). With increasing temporal scale, the consistency in the vertical wind increased. In addition, the Doppler wind lidar seemed to correlate better with the sonic wind anemometer at heights exceeding 300 m (R2: 0.48–0.77). Note that there was a remarkable difference between the Doppler wind lidar and 325 m meteorological tower observations as the aerosol concentrations changed rapidly. Different wind measurement instruments have unique advantages and are thus irreplaceable. The Doppler wind lidar is better at measuring larger turbulent eddies.
environmental sciences,meteorology & atmospheric sciences